From nobody Sun Nov 24 17:47:56 2024 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19FE718CBF8; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 03:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730690644; cv=none; b=gdLKNLaSZeZ68aInhy/VUHkyMRU8ln5yrAwn7HSYHTkGyej9HIDeBT6WRqFl0cCnbxicfYa4VphWmlpekhidc1AY9DH6CnN57Pua6+PpdOh42pTO063MZhjJAWE0M5f1KjBrAVYmDw9FlqcwXKIJiGj/lnguGLwHQY1PKkkfIoQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730690644; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GWTcXryd8vSLGfgO+TfhLzbUy81GbHz+WxF71vk9Bng=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=bRelgP7v5JhpQM1yomcScHRgA0B+xDP2AZ+3QXrFzOmzTvdEYnOri5nGRQQqRvl4mdqQNvDywSu5DprybAx97H4eCTXybY4c31iPo9fp+7CWflZRrPIfpAj7hAy/pErLJUvhm8A5CknzpTJleHQwcZAhHMT0qaGIRGCNwSGIIjA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Qxuo/+QE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Qxuo/+QE" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1730690643; x=1762226643; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GWTcXryd8vSLGfgO+TfhLzbUy81GbHz+WxF71vk9Bng=; b=Qxuo/+QEifCK3MrH3g+5WCcD0rSKWNKla1lz5aYmReQ58a3pYHx6YK42 yvU4LrMZFh9AQ2ZwKG9w5qzIpD8F9hIFMeMuCubiEvSoeFGhqh0Lcmrxr jqjIpkp9TX3RHp4LOiAfTc54vpHo7lZktz9N0zUamyoCuYzMtAaibhCQy QS0m6N7quGf6KpVK/VeypaXMlsp9i4y8VmMRVRcQsuVnbCMnfUZ7yyN06 BROJOn/2kfOpy+hBpWlPM6I0ept7iU52KRfpfkuGsyvqnH8uJDsP0/kvf oVTx7XFiB426iwzqJZm7xFLLd+AMlj7JUVrC+HKyfPYwcYfA8Bp0XAsCW Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: dWiDFzbKRCCjz8/7CLEIDw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: DNLA8y/UTMmer7JkMSWqWQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11245"; a="30594305" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,256,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="30594305" Received: from fmviesa001.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.141]) by fmvoesa108.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Nov 2024 19:23:57 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: I46TKKblSIOerpv1FEoN5w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 6iLKqTs+S92RmVXd6812Fg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,256,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="114331831" Received: from yungchua-ws.ostc.intel.com (HELO yungchua-ws.intel.com) ([10.54.69.90]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Nov 2024 19:23:57 -0800 From: Bard Liao To: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org Cc: vinod.koul@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev, bard.liao@intel.com Subject: [PATCH 10/12] soundwire: generic_bandwidth_allocation: check required freq accurately Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 03:23:56 +0000 Message-Id: <20241104032358.669705-11-yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20241104032358.669705-1-yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com> References: <20241104032358.669705-1-yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Currently, we check curr_dr_freq roughly by "if (curr_dr_freq <=3D bus->params.bandwidth)" in sdw_compute_bus_params() and check it accurately in sdw_select_row_col(). It works if we only support one freq. But, we need to check it accurately in sdw_select_row_col() to give it a chance to use a higher freq or use multi-lane. Signed-off-by: Bard Liao Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan --- drivers/soundwire/generic_bandwidth_allocation.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/generic_bandwidth_allocation.c b/drivers/sou= ndwire/generic_bandwidth_allocation.c index 5c4dac36ad1a..d2632af9c8af 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/generic_bandwidth_allocation.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/generic_bandwidth_allocation.c @@ -373,7 +373,8 @@ static int sdw_compute_bus_params(struct sdw_bus *bus) (bus->params.max_dr_freq >> clk_buf[i]) : clk_buf[i] * SDW_DOUBLE_RATE_FACTOR; =20 - if (curr_dr_freq <=3D bus->params.bandwidth) + if (curr_dr_freq * (mstr_prop->default_col - 1) < + bus->params.bandwidth * mstr_prop->default_col) continue; =20 break; --=20 2.34.1