From nobody Mon Nov 25 02:46:05 2024 Received: from smtpout.efficios.com (smtpout.efficios.com [167.114.26.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9600F19E99C; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 15:22:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=167.114.26.122 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730388161; cv=none; b=QQkQ57hr71f/tCadpNJxNt5UyaISXluclQ9AMTyOxhFHJgl6A2GgOm2tKWrJkl8/RfyEksVtBhXCEuxUsF3+F8N6OY80iE5lRQ8J1FxeiTZH+FM2ZNVrcjPNwDnc2QmDI05uEaoalkQ1MRpHL5kg6iuX/8+mbvcc57+5gB3jx14= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730388161; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZqpK2Tzlh2NaO9S+TPcvuIa3DNo8WQ0Kp8dlvt/m/dM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=SDsEDUWeif/Ngsbk5l5gRZeyeeXWvCKHomYymj1L9EwrrVbSdLlpsa5aLgbjIzcZSMlBi04SkmUEl/Wvg5oFGcS7+dns8cLI4+bd6krhP2Uj36wgnTi4ei7lHzyEgWZsuROj+4GtxOjCm2PKzEN5qNU4m9SM+sQdYABCIbcIXCM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=efficios.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=efficios.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=efficios.com header.i=@efficios.com header.b=IBH7L0QS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=167.114.26.122 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=efficios.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=efficios.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=efficios.com header.i=@efficios.com header.b="IBH7L0QS" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=efficios.com; s=smtpout1; t=1730388157; bh=ZqpK2Tzlh2NaO9S+TPcvuIa3DNo8WQ0Kp8dlvt/m/dM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=IBH7L0QSqdcbSyQWoYgEmlDWEPdg1dDtCIR+iRKeGkj8m3ydPWgAWAmP04uUzARTn Zd7k6lMoFXP3QkmZbNsrZOuD1k7XHFZ0tAuVwlyI1r9cyqr0a3yhK58fP+IX7WXEau 2rB5X+G8Jjn2hLkzGpmZ0uGGpjkH1it79xJzYm5EI64QnOA5QPyGbPpr6bKqq+IibE ydljVJp3e5Il/POnZjhrXKsufKzkPLAmnkoxZDy535bCE8bLvLgGKe2cLpk2qgeSF9 ThqsrjcctIJGnCL8nGlmeSnTl5PAFdQeH6TkgX8dpwP8FHn0wa66y0lRqvc5tTtu+Q 0mD09lDz8LedQ== Received: from thinkos.internal.efficios.com (96-127-217-162.qc.cable.ebox.net [96.127.217.162]) by smtpout.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4XfSRK188CzYqT; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 11:22:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Mathieu Desnoyers To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mathieu Desnoyers , Thomas Gleixner , Michael Jeanson , Masami Hiramatsu , Peter Zijlstra , Alexei Starovoitov , Yonghong Song , "Paul E . McKenney" , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Namhyung Kim , Andrii Nakryiko , bpf@vger.kernel.org, Joel Fernandes , Jordan Rife , linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrii Nakryiko Subject: [PATCH v5 resend 2/4] tracing: Introduce tracepoint_is_faultable() Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 11:20:54 -0400 Message-Id: <20241031152056.744137-3-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 In-Reply-To: <20241031152056.744137-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> References: <20241031152056.744137-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Introduce a "faultable" flag within the extended structure to know whether a tracepoint needs rcu tasks trace grace period before reclaim. This can be queried using tracepoint_is_faultable(). Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Tested-by: Jordan Rife Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Michael Jeanson Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Yonghong Song Cc: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Mark Rutland Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: Joel Fernandes Cc: Jordan Rife Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- Changes since v4: - Add static to DEFINE_TRACE_SYSCALL. --- include/linux/tracepoint-defs.h | 2 ++ include/linux/tracepoint.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/trace/define_trace.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint-defs.h b/include/linux/tracepoint-def= s.h index 967c08d9da84..aebf0571c736 100644 --- a/include/linux/tracepoint-defs.h +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint-defs.h @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ struct tracepoint_func { struct tracepoint_ext { int (*regfunc)(void); void (*unregfunc)(void); + /* Flags. */ + unsigned int faultable:1; }; =20 struct tracepoint { diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h index 862ab49177a4..906f3091d23d 100644 --- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h @@ -104,6 +104,12 @@ void for_each_tracepoint_in_module(struct module *mod, * tracepoint_synchronize_unregister must be called between the last trace= point * probe unregistration and the end of module exit to make sure there is no * caller executing a probe when it is freed. + * + * An alternative is to use the following for batch reclaim associated + * with a given tracepoint: + * + * - tracepoint_is_faultable() =3D=3D false: call_rcu() + * - tracepoint_is_faultable() =3D=3D true: call_rcu_tasks_trace() */ #ifdef CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS static inline void tracepoint_synchronize_unregister(void) @@ -111,9 +117,17 @@ static inline void tracepoint_synchronize_unregister(v= oid) synchronize_rcu_tasks_trace(); synchronize_rcu(); } +static inline bool tracepoint_is_faultable(struct tracepoint *tp) +{ + return tp->ext && tp->ext->faultable; +} #else static inline void tracepoint_synchronize_unregister(void) { } +static inline bool tracepoint_is_faultable(struct tracepoint *tp) +{ + return false; +} #endif =20 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS @@ -345,6 +359,15 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(= tracepoint_ptr_t *p) static struct tracepoint_ext __tracepoint_ext_##_name =3D { \ .regfunc =3D _reg, \ .unregfunc =3D _unreg, \ + .faultable =3D false, \ + }; \ + __DEFINE_TRACE_EXT(_name, &__tracepoint_ext_##_name, PARAMS(_proto), PARA= MS(_args)); + +#define DEFINE_TRACE_SYSCALL(_name, _reg, _unreg, _proto, _args) \ + static struct tracepoint_ext __tracepoint_ext_##_name =3D { \ + .regfunc =3D _reg, \ + .unregfunc =3D _unreg, \ + .faultable =3D true, \ }; \ __DEFINE_TRACE_EXT(_name, &__tracepoint_ext_##_name, PARAMS(_proto), PARA= MS(_args)); =20 @@ -389,6 +412,7 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(t= racepoint_ptr_t *p) #define __DECLARE_TRACE_SYSCALL __DECLARE_TRACE =20 #define DEFINE_TRACE_FN(name, reg, unreg, proto, args) +#define DEFINE_TRACE_SYSCALL(name, reg, unreg, proto, args) #define DEFINE_TRACE(name, proto, args) #define EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(name) #define EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL(name) diff --git a/include/trace/define_trace.h b/include/trace/define_trace.h index ff5fa17a6259..63fea2218afa 100644 --- a/include/trace/define_trace.h +++ b/include/trace/define_trace.h @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ =20 #undef TRACE_EVENT_SYSCALL #define TRACE_EVENT_SYSCALL(name, proto, args, struct, assign, print, reg,= unreg) \ - DEFINE_TRACE_FN(name, reg, unreg, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args)) + DEFINE_TRACE_SYSCALL(name, reg, unreg, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args)) =20 #undef TRACE_EVENT_NOP #define TRACE_EVENT_NOP(name, proto, args, struct, assign, print) --=20 2.39.5