From nobody Mon Nov 25 22:51:01 2024 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B07991E2607; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 13:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729775089; cv=none; b=aB0siWR9soJymbzz2sb4pEgo1p6mKrF4R5eadUyt/wtHhRG13WKFCsd1bFMEMH8/hdBk6P/PY74Yfwb1gv9wj4wvRe5cI0T2fWZvSoE4QWAcmZZrcrYFBxnjqqcVCAHQNYj1o2QiC4qgZPsmdmWLEob+bAjLguR+ImMOGN6bW0s= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729775089; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Iocz/KVSforp7TWPBNMBSymCJu2I9Wm9f+hSS1P8ifo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=DZ6jcDw0EAAEmC+gzAyDgzWk4jHcZGhq5CBWQJfpmAbGHZXLwY5Dkd0JE+pCUP/xdpJBiumKdu8g9uR5heUpynwOkxKyspkRu1vDhrjEnESrNIGmF9FOsxqnIB01J645+aseihTGIxsp20O+Kfj4+SC0zQzBMYj8f6WAooNMOFM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=XhKEEb/O; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="XhKEEb/O" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1729775088; x=1761311088; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Iocz/KVSforp7TWPBNMBSymCJu2I9Wm9f+hSS1P8ifo=; b=XhKEEb/OKhJlXIk5TONg6tXy1RKBakaWX+AbL5nFq9x9ocgznTUWM/1m iwV8KjA9PL4g3H2uFqV+OWa9/jJVXzFM2Y5y7SnI3aq/MYeH/MeIhNX5n rI7wny2x2ybeTA1QyaJpcEsmcGcvJYM7GxaYUvRMXYf7H2eVNQ4bwxSWl BzmROSLCrXhsI2P5ZPEjAX/AV/0jXxsWIt0aUxdPEjhePyp8dHIyLou5a pKW7/kt3A0T/iOWCZB+uT4MAn5xEwdON4EE2CYWmlrKQMm/ACbYf8Xd3S wp4kaQb0HMV7jR7v5SPZ73npu/UByVm+eYIaocDgo75BimMEEYIDqYyu4 w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: vzoKtPQtSZGsQRQ82bA+Ig== X-CSE-MsgGUID: AmDt5GFfT6u3PC8ks4y2tw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11235"; a="54802845" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,229,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="54802845" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by fmvoesa101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Oct 2024 06:04:32 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: q+4u1cDQSUOIZnIxYHooQw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 4qxAxZ1VQGic+Vojf1ToVA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,229,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="80238794" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by fmviesa007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2024 06:04:29 -0700 Received: by black.fi.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 355FA386; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:04:25 +0300 (EEST) From: Andy Shevchenko To: Andy Shevchenko , Jonathan Cameron , Marius Cristea , Trevor Gamblin , Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol , Hans de Goede , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Lars-Peter Clausen Subject: [PATCH v2 11/13] iio: light: ltr501: Drop most likely fake ACPI IDs Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 15:36:16 +0300 Message-ID: <20241024130424.3818291-12-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0.rc1.1336.g36b5255a03ac In-Reply-To: <20241024130424.3818291-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> References: <20241024130424.3818291-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The commits in question do not proove that ACPI IDs exist. Quite likely it was a cargo cult addition while doing that for DT-based enumeration. Drop most likely fake ACPI IDs. The to be removed IDs has been checked against the following resources: 1) DuckDuckGo 2) Google 3) MS catalog: https://www.catalog.update.microsoft.com/Search.aspx This gives no useful results in regard to DSDT, moreover, the official vendor ID in the registry for Lite-On is LCI. Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c b/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c index 8c516ede9116..3fff5d58ba3c 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c +++ b/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c @@ -1610,8 +1610,6 @@ static int ltr501_resume(struct device *dev) static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(ltr501_pm_ops, ltr501_suspend, ltr501_resu= me); =20 static const struct acpi_device_id ltr_acpi_match[] =3D { - { "LTER0501", ltr501 }, - { "LTER0559", ltr559 }, { "LTER0301", ltr301 }, { }, }; --=20 2.43.0.rc1.1336.g36b5255a03ac