From nobody Tue Nov 26 01:44:02 2024 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1E0D1C3050; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 15:21:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729696921; cv=none; b=KsBI1J0MX6LJTpAQwx1Xbjammb9H+K5tmjMeJByedAYNltvRRmrqd4M2DxWHFfGf6KiedQ1CzC5hmeBjmD3W6CLMwH5micN431nd+TjfPZbN7hwKGDrW2BuaOWISd/4VZ21lAukZdQ6QyMJKaibcMdIU3NzI26zJWufvLjqsZyE= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729696921; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jDq1gH5YCUKcq4BcItLXMsB6y4PEq3PrFo3E4XnyPsg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=CnGj2XHnEzodDgqYAD+nDpAeWrTXxkd6IkgUZMEMPLCxkvH99AhULuScteqZyK1QQ/+EH7jRN4gv2jqANfnESUhWwWueJqo9qSTbT3EhH+PJ7rV+/9CK2uhgl6M97u1DpBbCrmzJ81e4y5K1lhuIX3FK5f/CySkOBasHGgj+WI0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=II0wnrWr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="II0wnrWr" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1729696920; x=1761232920; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jDq1gH5YCUKcq4BcItLXMsB6y4PEq3PrFo3E4XnyPsg=; b=II0wnrWrh0t8fVhMEnjB+JuojxSQ/PAiX/aENrdxDfZozyctn5N4r7Pm UOL3qC7kkcUHAmPaxrCAME6MaYsCQMXklwJwXAN7YbZgnva5rCm+4ICRf mp6oA65DhB/twygCf2gV51x4z3Cv93fgs9DHjiJu6YM/YmhZufxTxWlhd mL5rlmpI9xCMpX1VuBF4BQZ80kjnps9N+xxryACDwdvXjXWZVQoeoFDJu 3cTgrALNLb5GSJc/vRiokvyYYZeMnebDa1zh8eQ2I5IVJSQNziJYB8el+ DWNUVNhSN0pGx7WWQoWiBIeheWNPWgedCPE63uLiJky0P1GdReObJ1hKt A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: uGjy5etLQESzzkOpyHEYmA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: o+HBFte8RaGIL2SsSgJbCA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11222"; a="46757927" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,199,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="46757927" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Oct 2024 08:21:56 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: zUwNeNHhQs6jTkXpENGOVg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: MUdqcuqNSRuuz2DjFLAjsw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,226,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="79823545" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by fmviesa006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Oct 2024 08:21:53 -0700 Received: by black.fi.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 24B7E644; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 18:21:49 +0300 (EEST) From: Andy Shevchenko To: Andy Shevchenko , Jonathan Cameron , Marius Cristea , Trevor Gamblin , Hans de Goede , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Lars-Peter Clausen , Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol Subject: [PATCH v1 11/13] iio: light: ltr501: Drop most likely fake ACPI IDs Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 18:17:34 +0300 Message-ID: <20241023152145.3564943-12-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0.rc1.1336.g36b5255a03ac In-Reply-To: <20241023152145.3564943-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> References: <20241023152145.3564943-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The commits in question do not proove that ACPI IDs exist. Quite likely it was a cargo cult addition while doing that for DT-based enumeration. Drop most likely fake ACPI IDs. The to be removed IDs has been checked against the following resources: 1) DuckDuckGo 2) Google 3) MS catalog: https://www.catalog.update.microsoft.com/Search.aspx This gives no useful results in regard to DSDT, moreover, the official vendor ID in the registry for Lite-On is LCI. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c b/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c index 8c516ede9116..3fff5d58ba3c 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c +++ b/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c @@ -1610,8 +1610,6 @@ static int ltr501_resume(struct device *dev) static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(ltr501_pm_ops, ltr501_suspend, ltr501_resu= me); =20 static const struct acpi_device_id ltr_acpi_match[] =3D { - { "LTER0501", ltr501 }, - { "LTER0559", ltr559 }, { "LTER0301", ltr301 }, { }, }; --=20 2.43.0.rc1.1336.g36b5255a03ac