From nobody Tue Nov 26 01:47:35 2024 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF9144503C; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 03:45:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729655112; cv=none; b=GA50O4utUbk2ke/hjuO9jLOelwnUZSLDCX13sLxWr4RVKY+a7ijlo5vM9VykDaf8yYUPnHeB6bfx6+rt42kSvl64G9TN4JKOLC4PChfQmldXGXVO3ldKh3THL1rv8euEQgbjm1cVb0PCD5Qql69pW/ZAbcL+IRBiC7ta+YTUNkM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729655112; c=relaxed/simple; bh=q1Cgk3EdRlCGwIGlFpSmls1eqESzBShWIedpv5+4V00=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=O6C1luaIbFAdkzMxy+eJpw0WAcYlTcrFGOw3MYtQqs0ze142cD9LamugzGKgJBJuFmlUaDh7JaK5YMkoyZNpXUv9gJNd7zqXF+I63qSLEf9eokBX9BV1jpENpa3K7GipelawEWr9ZCH4p61Mq/u684rjUzZm/i4wA5zZksf51iI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.235]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4XYFKq1WdVz4f3k6H; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 11:44:47 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.128]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 806D11A058E; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 11:44:59 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.104.67]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgD3LMk6cRhnKkt2Ew--.63539S4; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 11:44:59 +0800 (CST) From: Yu Kuai To: stable@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, axboe@kernel.dk, yukuai3@huawei.com Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yukuai1@huaweicloud.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com Subject: [PATCH 5.15] block, bfq: fix procress reference leakage for bfqq in merge chain Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 11:42:22 +0800 Message-Id: <20241023034222.3997079-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgD3LMk6cRhnKkt2Ew--.63539S4 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxZw4xtr4UAw4rWF4rJF17Awb_yoWruFWrpa 13ta1fAr1xXr45Wr17Jr4UZ3WFkr1fJ39rtF9aq34kJr1DArnrtF1qyw18ZF92qrZ5uw43 Xr10qr97Jr17JFDanT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUkC14x267AKxVW8JVW5JwAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0 rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2ocxC64kIII0Yj41l84x0c7CEw4AK67xGY2AK02 1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvE14v26F1j6w1UM28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4U JVWxJr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gc CE3s1le2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2WlYx0E 2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_JrI_JrylYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJV W8JwACjcxG0xvY0x0EwIxGrwACjI8F5VA0II8E6IAqYI8I648v4I1lc7CjxVAaw2AFwI0_ Jw0_GFyl42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67 AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r1q6r43MIIY rxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14 v26r4j6F4UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8 JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6r4UJbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjfUFg4SDU UUU X-CM-SenderInfo: 51xn3trlr6x35dzhxuhorxvhhfrp/ From: Yu Kuai [ Upstream commit 73aeab373557fa6ee4ae0b742c6211ccd9859280 ] Original state: Process 1 Process 2 Process 3 Process 4 (BIC1) (BIC2) (BIC3) (BIC4) =CE=9B | | | \--------------\ \-------------\ \-------------\| V V V bfqq1--------->bfqq2---------->bfqq3----------->bfqq4 ref 0 1 2 4 After commit 0e456dba86c7 ("block, bfq: choose the last bfqq from merge chain in bfq_setup_cooperator()"), if P1 issues a new IO: Without the patch: Process 1 Process 2 Process 3 Process 4 (BIC1) (BIC2) (BIC3) (BIC4) =CE=9B | | | \------------------------------\ \-------------\| V V bfqq1--------->bfqq2---------->bfqq3----------->bfqq4 ref 0 0 2 4 bfqq3 will be used to handle IO from P1, this is not expected, IO should be redirected to bfqq4; With the patch: ------------------------------------------- | | Process 1 Process 2 Process 3 | Process 4 (BIC1) (BIC2) (BIC3) | (BIC4) | | | | \-------------\ \-------------\| V V bfqq1--------->bfqq2---------->bfqq3----------->bfqq4 ref 0 0 2 4 IO is redirected to bfqq4, however, procress reference of bfqq3 is still 2, while there is only P2 using it. Fix the problem by calling bfq_merge_bfqqs() for each bfqq in the merge chain. Also change bfqq_merge_bfqqs() to return new_bfqq to simplify code. Fixes: 0e456dba86c7 ("block, bfq: choose the last bfqq from merge chain in = bfq_setup_cooperator()") Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240909134154.954924-3-yukuai1@huaweicloud= .com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index b0bdb5197530..c985c944fa65 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -2981,10 +2981,12 @@ void bfq_release_process_ref(struct bfq_data *bfqd,= struct bfq_queue *bfqq) bfq_put_queue(bfqq); } =20 -static void -bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_io_cq *bic, - struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq) +static struct bfq_queue *bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data *bfqd, + struct bfq_io_cq *bic, + struct bfq_queue *bfqq) { + struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq =3D bfqq->new_bfqq; + bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd, bfqq, "merging with queue %lu", (unsigned long)new_bfqq->pid); /* Save weight raising and idle window of the merged queues */ @@ -3078,6 +3080,8 @@ bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_io_= cq *bic, bfq_reassign_last_bfqq(bfqq, new_bfqq); =20 bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, bfqq); + + return new_bfqq; } =20 static bool bfq_allow_bio_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request *r= q, @@ -3113,14 +3117,8 @@ static bool bfq_allow_bio_merge(struct request_queue= *q, struct request *rq, * fulfilled, i.e., bic can be redirected to new_bfqq * and bfqq can be put. */ - bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bfqd->bio_bic, bfqq, - new_bfqq); - /* - * If we get here, bio will be queued into new_queue, - * so use new_bfqq to decide whether bio and rq can be - * merged. - */ - bfqq =3D new_bfqq; + while (bfqq !=3D new_bfqq) + bfqq =3D bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bfqd->bio_bic, bfqq); =20 /* * Change also bqfd->bio_bfqq, as @@ -5482,9 +5480,7 @@ bfq_do_early_stable_merge(struct bfq_data *bfqd, stru= ct bfq_queue *bfqq, * state before killing it. */ bfqq->bic =3D bic; - bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bic, bfqq, new_bfqq); - - return new_bfqq; + return bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bic, bfqq); } =20 /* @@ -5916,6 +5912,7 @@ static bool __bfq_insert_request(struct bfq_data *bfq= d, struct request *rq) bool waiting, idle_timer_disabled =3D false; =20 if (new_bfqq) { + struct bfq_queue *old_bfqq =3D bfqq; /* * Release the request's reference to the old bfqq * and make sure one is taken to the shared queue. @@ -5931,18 +5928,18 @@ static bool __bfq_insert_request(struct bfq_data *b= fqd, struct request *rq) * then complete the merge and redirect it to * new_bfqq. */ - if (bic_to_bfqq(RQ_BIC(rq), 1) =3D=3D bfqq) - bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, RQ_BIC(rq), - bfqq, new_bfqq); + if (bic_to_bfqq(RQ_BIC(rq), 1) =3D=3D bfqq) { + while (bfqq !=3D new_bfqq) + bfqq =3D bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, RQ_BIC(rq), bfqq); + } =20 - bfq_clear_bfqq_just_created(bfqq); + bfq_clear_bfqq_just_created(old_bfqq); /* * rq is about to be enqueued into new_bfqq, * release rq reference on bfqq */ - bfq_put_queue(bfqq); + bfq_put_queue(old_bfqq); rq->elv.priv[1] =3D new_bfqq; - bfqq =3D new_bfqq; } =20 bfq_update_io_thinktime(bfqd, bfqq); --=20 2.39.2