From nobody Wed Nov 27 07:49:36 2024 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.190]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4EE0201101; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 11:29:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.190 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728732593; cv=none; b=fD0FHuXORp0kFtamP7umM9cbpD6dURLqlEmZgEIuZ/w3r9IjUp7vEu1XAtWUIDqnUuBoZLew32/AWvS9wGPj/G6vEvlcE8wEbnK3R116h9vGwL5wbszC+tci5UIkvX0M1WiDB3hREKnPvVaJ7Q0YXSZS9olSxlk63sTPx3CSul8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728732593; c=relaxed/simple; bh=F8NaFy8Gqe3Y7KuxbrOesyWY58h7LgGRc3j4/fenDHI=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=W8kFHbVTPhRbWbH3/KBel1w/zn13xN5z9CTfS7NJC1NeFf2T+dcvGgWrdjLfIrLXDXDPNYRE1oEwV3Rb7tPHP8oaHkte+ZhoC+4EzCtFZAHkUXn++EdgHKOdPqzI/+fpO1bZasnEcmZ0Bq/xeibIvWA8Yn6NSjyK7rU+0sLn/UY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.190 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.44]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4XQh883ZRrz2DdSc; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:28:40 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemf200006.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.61]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A03CF1402CC; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:29:49 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.90.30.45) by dggpemf200006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:29:49 +0800 From: Yunsheng Lin To: , , CC: , , Yunsheng Lin , Alexander Duyck , Alexander Duyck , Andrew Morton , Subject: [PATCH net-next v21 08/14] mm: page_frag: use __alloc_pages() to replace alloc_pages_node() Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:23:14 +0800 Message-ID: <20241012112320.2503906-9-linyunsheng@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0 In-Reply-To: <20241012112320.2503906-1-linyunsheng@huawei.com> References: <20241012112320.2503906-1-linyunsheng@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To dggpemf200006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.61) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" It seems there is about 24Bytes binary size increase for __page_frag_cache_refill() after refactoring in arm64 system with 64K PAGE_SIZE. By doing the gdb disassembling, It seems we can have more than 100Bytes decrease for the binary size by using __alloc_pages() to replace alloc_pages_node(), as there seems to be some unnecessary checking for nid being NUMA_NO_NODE, especially when page_frag is part of the mm system. CC: Alexander Duyck Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck --- mm/page_frag_cache.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/page_frag_cache.c b/mm/page_frag_cache.c index a852523bc8ca..f55d34cf7d43 100644 --- a/mm/page_frag_cache.c +++ b/mm/page_frag_cache.c @@ -56,11 +56,11 @@ static struct page *__page_frag_cache_refill(struct pag= e_frag_cache *nc, #if (PAGE_SIZE < PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE) gfp_mask =3D (gfp_mask & ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) | __GFP_COMP | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC; - page =3D alloc_pages_node(NUMA_NO_NODE, gfp_mask, - PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_ORDER); + page =3D __alloc_pages(gfp_mask, PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_ORDER, + numa_mem_id(), NULL); #endif if (unlikely(!page)) { - page =3D alloc_pages_node(NUMA_NO_NODE, gfp, 0); + page =3D __alloc_pages(gfp, 0, numa_mem_id(), NULL); order =3D 0; } =20 --=20 2.33.0