From nobody Wed Nov 27 08:32:23 2024 Received: from mail-ej1-f45.google.com (mail-ej1-f45.google.com [209.85.218.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26E29154C17; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 09:54:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.45 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728726870; cv=none; b=A6TlqZkJoIhzw4H62N0SWLhBFvPW2Febb5t5NRQOmVVfu/lXGx99q8ahOqwTsGnVO05XwpxK/scDEBBLtStGgpk/aXrybV9RB7Mk9lrJdiMSrwZb26JHEE7pZLFVNh4qrCW0k7xhGctuUTDe0+1vdHe8gfUL0TT21HX858hzTLI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728726870; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8F4EAhMS7+CFB9fbxDKkef+lgknglgfHRwZSTghHyac=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=kuU8TvmOT1VknoJls8atGxU2TEy5wj8hbKsJbYgMc4yf1oUGuWfaKjvSR9Gx5pf0m0oXkF0kyqss6DdhehBPJ9YnkYXd/yHdFNfU0VLoUpqeUhO3HxszbIiNGL1V3ZToEHGzHZj2NxsYIpOPg/mNDpklilELrZSucW5ClnWV3sc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=Pc/abuOC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.45 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Pc/abuOC" Received: by mail-ej1-f45.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a99422c796eso455891766b.3; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 02:54:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1728726867; x=1729331667; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=k0+JljHLnekSSywTewBZ577k02mbpsj8v/vK0Vy1JgI=; b=Pc/abuOCGrOOmCSnDcBvhlEm6L9VsWQVcH3Yn0pHalXKVDCAiHILSulyTB0aGp6gCr LRKds09b7L8yK61uyJaKCrOZGjf7vowbSDdUnJo6+ehU3ye7p70Y3iDDONRZeHS4OnzF LkR3cTWp6AmOHE2xsNrYGQPcJDwKMNIGKISE4v5eHRKrVFhKXCSrn26GTI90DF/y0UmO ZLmJV9YroRFr0cj0Fw/1br9kJhyRnbX67eTMQTjBtDiv9o+f7OYUkTVf0CCgqfMLZXYI ydMMn5RVDpGop88uI8qu2e3aIwliDrqY505b3tCxWo4/HuFVnFKB7zKclzHu8+0QMLEZ wrNw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1728726867; x=1729331667; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=k0+JljHLnekSSywTewBZ577k02mbpsj8v/vK0Vy1JgI=; b=qcR9xlxEauSPZrytxMdi58a/tFOhYhUgjg/dS1799YYIY0zyKDno+XxaJF9LNwVAix 4hps4ekclwmSd9pAcaqqd3lV+6iP23fDQXel+T2J1x7X/NcClioafwp5HaVeqFhZx9NG 81NaT+N/zOwjkBxg5kJp6XIRjA+ej6r6QCS2x8XkGrh4SqibEZ19lptmU09HWcOz2kF4 2Swm9K8NPfePwgy5MRcD3/KfjDKrqBLI7pSQMuriLAc0wNcFsbxf3bUzeau+O4TOK6XN MU0tzkbmMC+Lje5k5lTvGCZ8ZOGBmtF81wiiWt1sQH4eXpLip8nDgRekEhhtTTB5dbp4 72Xw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCX9zj0GRKMV+86wc0C5CHr5e3Mh+K0GE2nZoXI3UsYIc6wnkYay6hzbnHX/Df44GNxIMz2miEUqlPXfwvQ=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxFJ7uE66KAKC2QvC8+Aq1HjGPAnKNTlRwnLnY+CwFwvxaDd3/C vBHXd72YQjKFDuZNr6Aalx6jbAfSchqbD58h77ij2aYHqyUnPQsqlCRflGZFmsM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEK1IX3mMJ8J6tExuY2o4k7qTsPV8XSQbjjlQxUqeuwlfqZ1KIIBiCh3GfFPh+WpiWZTVN4vw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:940c:b0:a8d:29b7:ecf3 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a99b930e9d1mr438252566b.13.1728726867324; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 02:54:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dslb-002-200-173-220.002.200.pools.vodafone-ip.de. [2.200.173.220]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-a99a80cb013sm304462866b.131.2024.10.12.02.54.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 12 Oct 2024 02:54:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Jonas Gorski Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 11:53:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 4/6] spi: don't check spi_controller::num_chipselect when parsing a dt device Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20241012-spi_multi_cs_cleanup-v1-4-dc491113880d@gmail.com> References: <20241012-spi_multi_cs_cleanup-v1-0-dc491113880d@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20241012-spi_multi_cs_cleanup-v1-0-dc491113880d@gmail.com> To: Mark Brown , Amit Kumar Mahapatra Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Mailer: b4 0.14.2 Do not validate spi_controller::num_chipselect against SPI_CS_CNT_MAX when parsing an spi device firmware node. Firstly this is the wrong place, and this should be done while registering/validating the controller. Secondly, there is no reason for that check, as SPI_CS_CNT_MAX controls the amount of chipselects a device may have, not a controller may have. So drop that check as it needlessly limits controllers to SPI_CS_CNT_MAX number of chipselects. Likewise, drop the check for number of device chipselects larger than controller's number of chipselects, as __spi_add_device() will already catch that as either one of the chip selects will be out of range, or there is a duplicate one. Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski --- drivers/spi/spi.c | 11 +---------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c index 495b391710d69a46beaa56c1a4332eb6677d2f45..ebf8bc9c2276a6f50ba6e9fded4= 8c870c4bd5ff0 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c @@ -2430,11 +2430,6 @@ static int of_spi_parse_dt(struct spi_controller *ct= lr, struct spi_device *spi, return 0; } =20 - if (ctlr->num_chipselect > SPI_CS_CNT_MAX) { - dev_err(&ctlr->dev, "No. of CS is more than max. no. of supported CS\n"); - return -EINVAL; - } - /* Device address */ rc =3D of_property_read_variable_u32_array(nc, "reg", &cs[0], 1, SPI_CS_CNT_MAX); @@ -2443,11 +2438,7 @@ static int of_spi_parse_dt(struct spi_controller *ct= lr, struct spi_device *spi, nc, rc); return rc; } - if (rc > ctlr->num_chipselect) { - dev_err(&ctlr->dev, "%pOF has number of CS > ctlr->num_chipselect (%d)\n= ", - nc, rc); - return -EINVAL; - } + if ((of_property_read_bool(nc, "parallel-memories")) && (!(ctlr->flags & SPI_CONTROLLER_MULTI_CS))) { dev_err(&ctlr->dev, "SPI controller doesn't support multi CS\n"); --=20 2.43.0