From nobody Wed Nov 27 16:58:28 2024 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A77B1E0DC8; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 15:28:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728487721; cv=none; b=JRLdYojqSFZSXWaHeG1cykQRefdLFM2q7I8GH0uAGiNXf6aAkicj0dUDLYkLxrMRy1ij/FraWqg9tARxkjjV7zKwh+hdL36CXMuHMYrugPf9McYuT5/NdC/jLnmah02DlTCnVNWuRL7dLSuWCAv3Y7c16jUsQg0nHLuJxY48O9M= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728487721; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tQu14JwbxzrPa5a9MiLdxfRNOKo0ysvLK8e1crTNaM4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=gEMIH1E7r66PTQV3EM4ZJZsXmvdIWTGPXcKL1L0K+OB1A6weqLu1hyUohR3DSCn1sD+0808im0qCt6V9tDZtsPctwVDjIcN/PqZJOBnK9IWK2XWkSLf6sHjXPK/XHs7c0bgYUaTV4BLK4rhOs/v84vJkIXoGfCQgMknb3tihcZc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=i++jiO4J; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="i++jiO4J" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1728487720; x=1760023720; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tQu14JwbxzrPa5a9MiLdxfRNOKo0ysvLK8e1crTNaM4=; b=i++jiO4J9IyQ+bJTK2X29tZI0TjGoiIMp8Ezx+aEcpkeHFc7zFZCfwk0 HRvgU15Z24ahr2S3IWuTAjH9laOyLrbqXteGpVz2PaYCPqW9mSq+Z8Mii QkcNCLV+NtpVc/zNt1owdPRqsT6o6+Yk2y0pW6oNhrx9OhDY8w6rzoRBw WPC8sN+BiBnn8YOF6qb6D8YouQsk5Z5PE//u2ZdK4Y3R8zS2Wja2vthS6 FYljohBgVsEWMZjhr8unTMEEhN/WETpdgF96Zkj6soNUNIHsQZxgnm7kd 9z7Af46r3q8ODK7XwSUQzfEGgQvZ/nyKz0nqzT/wfVCrMPgNVwp6r2Lzv w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: lRi171qmRYKWwmgP99zCeQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 5PrW0w9ZRFKpPj8j86WKnQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11220"; a="27675678" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,190,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="27675678" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by fmvoesa111.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Oct 2024 08:28:39 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: D26v3ednTOyimH8wwB7F8Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: DqqnZYu/SYuTNbw7Xw0amQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,190,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="81305765" Received: from newjersey.igk.intel.com ([10.102.20.203]) by orviesa004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Oct 2024 08:28:36 -0700 From: Alexander Lobakin To: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni Cc: Alexander Lobakin , =?UTF-8?q?Toke=20H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , John Fastabend , Andrii Nakryiko , Stanislav Fomichev , Magnus Karlsson , nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@intel.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH net-next 01/18] jump_label: export static_key_slow_{inc,dec}_cpuslocked() Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 17:27:39 +0200 Message-ID: <20241009152756.3113697-2-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.2 In-Reply-To: <20241009152756.3113697-1-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> References: <20241009152756.3113697-1-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sometimes, there's a need to modify a lot of static keys or modify the same key multiple times in a loop. In that case, it seems more optimal to lock cpu_read_lock once and then call _cpuslocked() variants. The enable/disable functions are already exported, the refcounted counterparts however are not. Fix that to allow modules to save some cycles. Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin --- kernel/jump_label.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/jump_label.c b/kernel/jump_label.c index 93a822d3c468..1034c0348995 100644 --- a/kernel/jump_label.c +++ b/kernel/jump_label.c @@ -182,6 +182,7 @@ bool static_key_slow_inc_cpuslocked(struct static_key *= key) } return true; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(static_key_slow_inc_cpuslocked); =20 bool static_key_slow_inc(struct static_key *key) { @@ -342,6 +343,7 @@ void static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked(struct static_key *= key) STATIC_KEY_CHECK_USE(key); __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked(key); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked); =20 void __static_key_slow_dec_deferred(struct static_key *key, struct delayed_work *work, --=20 2.46.2