From nobody Wed Nov 27 16:46:01 2024 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB9F21A2540; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 12:52:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728478322; cv=none; b=AcWy5sz1/nc0+afsLxNER1Nrdcg/0AxgOvyG5/VBPRdu8WaGfoc7UMJAcUSd+JJwbkOtEzRh6IeAwDm+HWZjsdcUc5BzTooV+vI4X+OXBgn9d/k5vZcofS7F6ZWHd3P1gPornGYtf6RgDp5F06bkzVGFXD9Wvle6lzfWxei/F7s= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728478322; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+KNwfAeGfopxST2YcyDd++R2YqnV7Z//j5Y+S4cdFGk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=bDIi15QzUgpQgpVjRmxJtaClvmUeq5DDBhSk7GGBkD5pwKQjo6T6tHHnsvgdzYxR6t02s16rLohJB9Rf/vlLq/+NzAe5/U5KpaTAyvWefg3XMdNtg/VgRX7UU4ZwGZ10VkVbTDATTzVQ6lM0nX/ZL08wvnXzME7V9R5kulgddy4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=XKfsG7XJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="XKfsG7XJ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F3C2C4CEC5; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 12:51:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1728478322; bh=+KNwfAeGfopxST2YcyDd++R2YqnV7Z//j5Y+S4cdFGk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XKfsG7XJH/N7e+l+FLANgLva7Ppn0kXak1ESbL/pKgXvCLqlIuMmvYlQvCxPtyqzK rin8pYgxFASnk/9259KLAmMUct/Q9DsBu1/SiQg/a5nIlm1pgpSdGSguSZsgw0yab7 RuGSLGT6HtQLrCwR+Vya9mWDUgOzE6c1uiuOZRw6mUQEIuYIp2zGKM4omLr+l6yhCd h15QBDL0FUd2gVmjyM26Yy1cADtpVpNYEbbnbBlxlvWubaDcyPJSp+5ozz71iPScYJ XyT01xs5i8ADF9KhnPmV3KkC1d7KtMkOPWHj6n4bueLMW1eK5DD72Gr3bLjZhP9fNm hTbTvWxHWWpjw== From: neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org To: rcu@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@kernel.org, joel@joelfernandes.org, frederic@kernel.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com, urezki@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com, peterz@infradead.org, neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com, Neeraj Upadhyay Subject: [PATCH v2 04/10] rcu/tasks: Create rcu_idle_task_is_holdout() definition for !SMP Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 18:21:21 +0530 Message-Id: <20241009125127.18902-5-neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1 In-Reply-To: <20241009125127.18902-1-neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org> References: <20241009125127.18902-1-neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Neeraj Upadhyay rcu_idle_task_is_holdout() is called in rcu_tasks_kthread() context. As idle tasks cannot be non-voluntary preempted, non-running idle tasks are not in RCU-tasks critical section. So, idle task is not a RCU-tasks holdout task on !SMP (which also covers TINY_RCU). Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay --- kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h index 56015ced3f37..b794deeaf6d8 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h +++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h @@ -976,6 +976,7 @@ static void rcu_tasks_pregp_step(struct list_head *hop) synchronize_rcu(); } =20 +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP static bool rcu_idle_task_is_holdout(struct task_struct *t, int cpu) { /* Idle tasks on offline CPUs are RCU-tasks quiescent states. */ @@ -984,6 +985,17 @@ static bool rcu_idle_task_is_holdout(struct task_struc= t *t, int cpu) =20 return true; } +#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_SMP */ +static inline bool rcu_idle_task_is_holdout(struct task_struct *t, int cpu) +{ + /* + * rcu_idle_task_is_holdout() is called in rcu_tasks_kthread() + * context. Idle thread would have done a voluntary context + * switch. + */ + return false; +} +#endif =20 /* Check for quiescent states since the pregp's synchronize_rcu() */ static bool rcu_tasks_is_holdout(struct task_struct *t) --=20 2.40.1