From nobody Wed Nov 27 20:40:54 2024 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22B411DED69; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:27:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.189 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728386837; cv=none; b=YTSB3hhreB/N2tKF3zr0AJZnXBl3hR5D5RJ4FSHpWam3n2b8w33vDvGrN0l4QTzxLD4EhtJxf00IHQcciiEMaEyhEfp5l4NvzL3jMTQB3oVpjNaxwWeIkZsCtP+hn3D+awje6vKGe6ZivNfKkfs5GewJTOYWXdObi3xF5QvYP0w= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728386837; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xTjBrm5Y4qI0wmPME04o3toGSxRcQSlebFaWt5AbpZc=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fRqN8jh3Ee59B/GSW37ccX6TImOGguOa56MgCUgUVIFrQDfgsWYRXzOcuvgYVDbPZkH0+i/O18yVj25Txc2mLCetHm4qWCeNwXrll2tSSjZNPLtg/iNCV6i5Qm+j1Ywiemoem8GJvofPZNcNf6N6PMxSvKh6oECPMH9FHmJ6Zrw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.189 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.162.254]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4XNDHd3dZpzCt4S; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:26:37 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemf200006.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.61]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 388E81800DE; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:27:13 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.90.30.45) by dggpemf200006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:27:12 +0800 From: Yunsheng Lin To: , , CC: , , Yunsheng Lin , Alexander Duyck , Alexander Duyck , Andrew Morton , Subject: [PATCH net-next v20 08/14] mm: page_frag: use __alloc_pages() to replace alloc_pages_node() Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:20:42 +0800 Message-ID: <20241008112049.2279307-9-linyunsheng@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0 In-Reply-To: <20241008112049.2279307-1-linyunsheng@huawei.com> References: <20241008112049.2279307-1-linyunsheng@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To dggpemf200006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.61) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" It seems there is about 24Bytes binary size increase for __page_frag_cache_refill() after refactoring in arm64 system with 64K PAGE_SIZE. By doing the gdb disassembling, It seems we can have more than 100Bytes decrease for the binary size by using __alloc_pages() to replace alloc_pages_node(), as there seems to be some unnecessary checking for nid being NUMA_NO_NODE, especially when page_frag is part of the mm system. CC: Alexander Duyck Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck --- mm/page_frag_cache.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/page_frag_cache.c b/mm/page_frag_cache.c index e17f4a530af2..4666dbec38eb 100644 --- a/mm/page_frag_cache.c +++ b/mm/page_frag_cache.c @@ -61,11 +61,11 @@ static struct page *__page_frag_cache_refill(struct pag= e_frag_cache *nc, #if (PAGE_SIZE < PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE) gfp_mask =3D (gfp_mask & ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) | __GFP_COMP | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC; - page =3D alloc_pages_node(NUMA_NO_NODE, gfp_mask, - PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_ORDER); + page =3D __alloc_pages(gfp_mask, PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_ORDER, + numa_mem_id(), NULL); #endif if (unlikely(!page)) { - page =3D alloc_pages_node(NUMA_NO_NODE, gfp, 0); + page =3D __alloc_pages(gfp, 0, numa_mem_id(), NULL); order =3D 0; } =20 --=20 2.33.0