From nobody Tue Dec 16 11:42:59 2025 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1B601898EB for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2024 05:54:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725515695; cv=none; b=uKTMHhYh8ZERv5sGftZhndUf9tg8Au8Cj8oER9bTu94gnQ4twxIRQpIe02p5sDSZ2DeVU22pvYtSsHz7a9GtBgP+a5/yHtJpbet/02ZSu8weGwaOEtCcSuynq3B0RsqzZ1j0fy1mMp5Y0pveoDvIyqmzyoGiJywxqdPesCUpVmY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725515695; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IoEbX8ulS4nbWpyE+m+Af6Xb8Zi/WPdDMRA2qcoZ2Vk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References; b=q2tIjMZ/yV2pQkB94IDx9JKz1ggiugzBX1mXlGFeq+sjGmb/GMoZbbc88od9+hkzHE/dEB6KWRJX8Xshy1/o96K1I6upSpEo9sulbHFz9cHqZXzOrE31zlhUkkIHlKvHx0SLFMg3UyEUM9Bsy/OvOv8NuYyq+6h+EmA1ILnkXyI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=nNv3pHrD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="nNv3pHrD" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1725515693; x=1757051693; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references; bh=IoEbX8ulS4nbWpyE+m+Af6Xb8Zi/WPdDMRA2qcoZ2Vk=; b=nNv3pHrDfrzXlOnZvAR1e9xMm8gkclfFzukasj98PAOsHa+AgrePqtgP FTLBTPn4OKUQZbiMvK4+uPS2gAyOthyUp8pxSRwVjq3cl1l7F4ZRG0Aed vK3bqQBXgRCuGp6NgDoaoZqzxKMzyfTqW4AzPFmmarvCiTEuPT1rq2IxB q2ka3oHR3bvLP/aq6YRDpMGZZsh1qlDhRhXiT6kvb+xvU0kFK9IZOGNSb CRoxO8yGs+BbwTZ6ExiCjgjJwZDfdwS6Qr0gzOGIHuO3XQ6smyemPOTUD Ron7buylPA22QmWPZ8lq9yAd4t8E0FqrMR6XFy8Kkev8r0oXBOQYksawF g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Zf2HuIOnSL2OAPo0gFRBQw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 3Pvzm9H2Q3C8Rbzqk5sVOA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11185"; a="35567211" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,203,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="35567211" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Sep 2024 22:54:51 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: /KnsrvVgRESsnoDRbQ1YLg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: MIeozWI0R2a6JzHwHSOiOg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,203,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="70421572" Received: from ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com ([172.25.110.23]) by orviesa004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Sep 2024 22:54:50 -0700 From: Ricardo Neri To: x86@kernel.org Cc: Andreas Herrmann , Catalin Marinas , Chen Yu , Len Brown , Radu Rendec , Pierre Gondois , Pu Wen , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Sudeep Holla , Srinivas Pandruvada , Will Deacon , Zhang Rui , Nikolay Borisov , Huang Ying , Ricardo Neri , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v6 4/4] x86/cacheinfo: Clean out init_cache_level() Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 23:00:36 -0700 Message-Id: <20240905060036.5655-5-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20240905060036.5655-1-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> References: <20240905060036.5655-1-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" init_cache_level() no longer has a purpose on x86. It no longer needs to set num_leaves, and it never had to set num_levels, which was unnecessary on x86. Replace it with "return 0" simply to override the weak function, which would return an error. Reviewed-by: Andreas Herrmann Reviewed-by: Len Brown Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov Tested-by: Andreas Herrmann Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri --- Cc: Andreas Herrmann Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Chen Yu CC: Huang Ying Cc: Len Brown Cc: Nikolay Borisov Cc: Radu Rendec Cc: Pierre Gondois Cc: Pu Wen Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Sudeep Holla Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Zhang Rui Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.3+ --- Changes since v5: * Added Reviewed-by tag from Nikolay and Andreas. Thanks! Changes since v4: * None Changes since v3: * Rebased on v6.7-rc5. Changes since v2: * None Changes since v1: * Introduced this patch. --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinf= o.c index 182cacd772b8..2a37f14cc6b1 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c @@ -1002,11 +1002,6 @@ static void ci_leaf_init(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf, =20 int init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu) { - struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci =3D get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu); - - if (!this_cpu_ci) - return -EINVAL; - this_cpu_ci->num_levels =3D 3; return 0; } =20 --=20 2.34.1