From nobody Fri Dec 19 09:18:53 2025 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C407A1448E1 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 12:55:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719924957; cv=none; b=PKeNP381B0TqEvJAoIc6laDnRSia+TTVodQZkEP0YU7gXedKNoPKw0x2C/SszWmNmjnpDHUwolEScgCC7vszD+5WNElJytfNeEoSSO3HmIKiuZOw1o/Wl2HlavjbWgSo33X7VGY9Yipx/tKHCSMs2Ae+HuYLwqDd9V9c5MsdmZg= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719924957; c=relaxed/simple; bh=U6P7eVCzJoZzuJy/y8BdW7LZwuVI4OUl7YOCmqw2RZk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=MN33VSYM3LPPjm9rl3VsTFTZLkPKN2w98UlNNqPltzz8PFdcwDq5FN9+2oI8k6o3vrwlAKHDGCBG8gjeYJ5NN24NWawF0PELGfsVQxC1R28jHQv1l8HghUINdwkMHpkavIuvH7IF3LhVn4lekNwuSDZBnUPKRDHZOapLpIW/9Vo= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=N2/F+RmQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="N2/F+RmQ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1719924954; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EkI6WIyKHOIUgF7Gkeaz7pP1bO8F3B8gLjy573v/fkE=; b=N2/F+RmQUTvDmkhYiQFcEU7Qfkhsll8KQj5UfKc81r4PFIPHnBm3StNuccFYwCxYF5TAKx 4rwSbImSQzmcWdf3tgFl+K2Eu8RFpcO12vm7fnM2FQKmI/75GecxcU62Uo4BUPY6y2/Iw6 DHkbaR8kXYixtkJ4QkYKPnm97fZW1iU= Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-626-kD7lF_IfMSiA8WIKJOk85w-1; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 08:55:49 -0400 X-MC-Unique: kD7lF_IfMSiA8WIKJOk85w-1 Received: from mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C906B1944D1D; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 12:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fedora.redhat.com (unknown [10.22.34.168]) by mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240143000B5E; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 12:55:46 +0000 (UTC) From: Audra Mitchell To: kunit-dev@googlegroups.com Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, npache@redhat.com, raquini@redhat.com Subject: [PATCH] Disable Clk-gate_tests for s390 Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:55:39 -0400 Message-ID: <20240702125539.524489-1-audra@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Currently clk-gate tests for s390 fail as the tests create a pretend clk-gate and use a "fake_reg" to emulate the expected behavior of the clk_gate->reg. I added some debug statements to the driver and noticed that the reg changes after initialization to -1, which is coming from an error coming from zpci_load(). This is likely because the test is using fake iomem and the s390 architecture likely isn't designed to handle that. Turn off the clk-gate tests for s390 for now as there is no clear work around for this problem as discussed in upstream conversation [1]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/301cd41e6283c12ac67fb8c0f8d5c929.sboyd@kern= el.org/T/#t Signed-off-by: Audra Mitchell --- drivers/clk/Kconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/clk/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/Kconfig index 3e9099504fad..3c3e0b969020 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/clk/Kconfig @@ -514,6 +514,7 @@ config CLK_KUNIT_TEST config CLK_GATE_KUNIT_TEST tristate "Basic gate type Kunit test" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS depends on KUNIT + depends on !S390 default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS help Kunit test for the basic clk gate type. --=20 2.44.0