From nobody Wed Feb 11 21:31:08 2026 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC07D1AAE12 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 11:50:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718884231; cv=none; b=ho4cxsE+RhgpzY55E+UrnyQxKFUbhfKeDTnDVtGchQKFapz37oz2di4zDLjgEQLV0Qe9ww2aqfNMlskNaRna2jLjjVf92hA5nAvkHxl8eQNtd1VP8e7aCdPJroliI3pHs6taFKBhTeoi5uMIQP1H34cJiGNBXn1jzsY+xp6Y6f0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718884231; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iOzVDw446sjQ+BfSiKI2J7kMH91mM90U6cJySi28zac=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=fG2zRg0YuQVpVXUnW8YHKhGxKs/cEjc5Ds6HXpELQw4Y8hrtqkz2KPrwRy2XS+FbUOnINCROiRZYGsz1E/uGNszYoVS2UzdPld1FT3HjY8hRlKiiO00u9gb//sIR6LkbS+jrCCWxRaJc1h3+tZwOyKVk4Sf1roPkCAqAdUOdXe8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=Gqa7xL3w; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="Gqa7xL3w" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s=k1; bh=hhjBD+ima6QVHIrHeWwX9nW5Tqwsw/JyzTU2SbaYaPA=; b=Gqa7xL 3wzoIEK1N1y4BRR/HTbfsx9hVIkHOj7ZNq8QOmeT10XtxyONiu3clghhsrqyW1p0 tR8/kbcQLkFW0AryJJzT4TvU+BI97J8cTHBl1MwVA5uTkYgxpwsyA9VFD0FkNp3Y ju5tdUp3RRtljL68wkXNVQKsGjm3oMwa6dn/9h7CmIMazCEoE9y2r49MDSK7/niw 7jbsEde/C1eg/7i7HQv6y0GsOu7Rw+xlYYPs9P1At/WFikBkZAMgvQczRcR38i8M 6If5LFFsJShsiLqzujggiKcqNKw+fKwuPpgTpym9Ox2FusxXSucrs0rYs/wquN2h W5z0VrvUAHrxk7/Q== Received: (qmail 1002798 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2024 13:50:24 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 20 Jun 2024 13:50:24 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@C/+b61AbzpMgAwDPXzjQABqqX1QYyOSW From: Wolfram Sang To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Wolfram Sang , Moritz Fischer , Wu Hao , Xu Yilun , Tom Rix , linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] fpga: socfpga: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion*() Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:50:21 +0200 Message-ID: <20240620115022.24409-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20240620115022.24409-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> References: <20240620115022.24409-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to store the result of wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout() causing patterns like: timeout =3D wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(...) if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT; with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code self explaining. Fix to the proper variable type 'long' while here. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang --- Change since v1: * use reverse-xmas-tree for variable init * keep chars/line limits in commit message drivers/fpga/socfpga.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/fpga/socfpga.c b/drivers/fpga/socfpga.c index 723ea0ad3f09..f772b754aa76 100644 --- a/drivers/fpga/socfpga.c +++ b/drivers/fpga/socfpga.c @@ -301,16 +301,17 @@ static irqreturn_t socfpga_fpga_isr(int irq, void *de= v_id) =20 static int socfpga_fpga_wait_for_config_done(struct socfpga_fpga_priv *pri= v) { - int timeout, ret =3D 0; + long time_left; + int ret =3D 0; =20 socfpga_fpga_disable_irqs(priv); init_completion(&priv->status_complete); socfpga_fpga_enable_irqs(priv, SOCFPGA_FPGMGR_MON_CONF_DONE); =20 - timeout =3D wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout( + time_left =3D wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout( &priv->status_complete, msecs_to_jiffies(10)); - if (timeout =3D=3D 0) + if (time_left =3D=3D 0) ret =3D -ETIMEDOUT; =20 socfpga_fpga_disable_irqs(priv); --=20 2.43.0