From nobody Fri Dec 19 21:46:41 2025 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62F641527BF for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 16:42:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718037748; cv=none; b=inke3Wp6wFcVE7u7BCURKk8yNuJOQoZxOzDy82AK3mYwff3GQEwu+R2DgeSEDcfpyEyUkqUZUTHQnPemp6WqSqhlaC27FYjQY7GSjCWitIhBbDAe9LhmN7B9RiZYygY7nMyHGoQkCFDXSmI+sz0Bp9RzWwgLckFs2fLJW3MU/NE= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718037748; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dqa4y3Sy5EE+IYLFY+hDqiZngky6H6vw41xP99gkF3Q=; h=Message-ID:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Date; b=oRbwmrjnAxNBnVcEPLjtPb2KPKPe1bcI5t4kXlKufUmdse4Ct2Wq+oySGroON78t6g+BUm+J99VYTOJdJH1pa5fFWXy8p0KvFyQDOxoQkOGWfrcNutVh4faGZQ+Sns/y01qNJXg0xybTg/WfL8wO/KROYjUsF9odNNhM2YunGvY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=U91obDz2; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=UHm0AVah; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="U91obDz2"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="UHm0AVah" Message-ID: <20240610164026.426847875@linutronix.de> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1718037744; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: references:references; bh=4hHoBY9MrEXBowGP0DzQQAtC7OGDF1Jxkr/5VDlxgmk=; b=U91obDz21B8Sq8Qh+XkgBXNEQA37Wj2rCT6IZnB00VQzm+jIr9miuLo+qE8MVff9SUMEoF iJXDQLLQ6YjTeDXg9ThXTUyUF7IEnF1v/h0VO6WUTxjTEbg/OzYQU0aTWmMYV+NvLJsQNo qUY5lDVZEn0yry4Y8Nrx0CgCl4Kkw6PMjIgrYSyX4m2jdsPsiXkDlLN9JYLUWbfs3WkuEH 53Xdr0MpwidmYKQuMtmpnUqV/DkmLhgjKxPif4wDQ/Y/ykkHSx3TKwGLNyVw0oimf+oA84 1H8lKb11XngZsKp+/6f7+SrR3/1LGeMbo792FcKKRyGsPwwCbQjrleLLztFewQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1718037744; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: references:references; bh=4hHoBY9MrEXBowGP0DzQQAtC7OGDF1Jxkr/5VDlxgmk=; b=UHm0AVahaTPWcbf1+eBHm9ETbkZsQNJ6OwYzyxh544qI+1W51u+ykPOBSbSj5KFpF9MVD1 EkSgqaHM6A26CRBQ== From: Thomas Gleixner To: LKML Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen , Frederic Weisbecker , John Stultz , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Stephen Boyd , Eric Biederman , Oleg Nesterov Subject: [patch V3 15/51] posix-cpu-timers: Remove incorrect comment in posix_cpu_timer_set() References: <20240610163452.591699700@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 18:42:23 +0200 (CEST) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" A leftover from historical code which describes fiction. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker --- kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 7 +------ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c +++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c @@ -689,13 +689,8 @@ static int posix_cpu_timer_set(struct k_ __posix_cpu_timer_get(timer, old, now); } =20 + /* Retry if the timer expiry is running concurrently */ if (unlikely(ret)) { - /* - * We are colliding with the timer actually firing. - * Punt after filling in the timer's old value, and - * disable this firing since we are already reporting - * it as an overrun (thanks to bump_cpu_timer above). - */ unlock_task_sighand(p, &flags); goto out; }