From nobody Thu Dec 18 17:43:59 2025 Received: from out-179.mta1.migadu.com (out-179.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07CC813FFC for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 03:28:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.179 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714447693; cv=none; b=ZRK8+cKDluDS3faxbPsuIrlY4aQC0yZNi+SmmG4P87U4hNTqsE248H5e0Tqb09b5QrxODGuCFiW2obDrxf93LL+sl3rgfuaqUozuisNxtX6/M8tVwzCZWw/CcZfTP+DuGI6vGmqKPXy4xzZSzHEseioly7/oAN9DA/wRz/OsFLI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714447693; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vnByxI1yvhz7cQm2zv+fS4UfkLZ+4Eziu8+SfaJw+2k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=SvyF58A42wAa4SD9J2iqRzoa+Oro7uY/5uDvRV5FplvRuQ1CUdVW4/q+sTAUgIfu1SttOq3Vwyyj4uT9pmHlsoqT+k+OXjsRhkvSdaMBdK0gltFtfCrz0IzjP/8i7iDDNkKgnhVPlucD77CwKYxJFTw8eoj/tF8X8xr21rDHX0s= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=ZHIXm3oW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.179 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="ZHIXm3oW" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1714447690; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=u4umKi23uEoIzCMao6IETndhg1LA1WkSNjlJJg1tq54=; b=ZHIXm3oWpT8m+6fZAyjcYFDFIaarFCd7TZuXD/ZkQuaNepvQVhaph0QEPhsijnPfdtlKKe qaeM7Iady1yJWshq7sKGlU56qVfBkH4zZQC53BNkasAs9+7DBIXTsFwE3PUVQFa/2aGk/K ZxVJT99dDoIKA2T482zmvOMex/fPAW8= From: Youling Tang To: Kent Overstreet Cc: linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Youling Tang Subject: [PATCH] bcachefs: Correct the FS_IOC_GETFLAGS to FS_IOC32_GETFLAGS in bch2_compat_fs_ioctl() Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:27:44 +0800 Message-Id: <20240430032744.943468-1-youling.tang@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Youling Tang It should be FS_IOC32_GETFLAGS instead of FS_IOC_GETFLAGS in compat ioctl. Signed-off-by: Youling Tang --- fs/bcachefs/fs-ioctl.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/fs-ioctl.c b/fs/bcachefs/fs-ioctl.c index 3dc8630ff9fe..205a323ffc6d 100644 --- a/fs/bcachefs/fs-ioctl.c +++ b/fs/bcachefs/fs-ioctl.c @@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ long bch2_compat_fs_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned c= md, unsigned long arg) { /* These are just misnamed, they actually get/put from/to user an int */ switch (cmd) { - case FS_IOC_GETFLAGS: + case FS_IOC32_GETFLAGS: cmd =3D FS_IOC_GETFLAGS; break; case FS_IOC32_SETFLAGS: --=20 2.34.1