From nobody Fri May 17 05:50:22 2024 Received: from mail-ot1-f43.google.com (mail-ot1-f43.google.com [209.85.210.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDC2613CF87; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 12:22:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.43 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713356536; cv=none; b=lIeuP1Tj00mjEvfKOkqvEZL+byZ8DpsIgi35aSAJGE+uH34lxT0XRVUd/WoxDaBmUvegxDKI5lybXS7FkpitMJcj6iiaL8ItT57feZ7xeOy4P1irn4C6NsOFkwwF3r1M0aogHawVfnXdyhFqxsup3GrBuG3nC/jnLNuPT5VKCaA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713356536; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eNdPSLbQ08oIwVxA3DSSN1bgvrlYuVTEEZlegEhyhrs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=LnyxJhTVQ1nMbQil+E/KmueIcPeyIidMJiYuxTNEvoGAK/vITIsP3WhZcrJdprVPHIghfqKUEs8aPQaedhp0AmGcQGPv8Tsom3XdHAJVtwaTaHf+gXtGkJ/ulC7hX/yY2bBlXm4Qptz7YnZvKNZxTiD/Q8KQD6C5K8oEdWDXe+I= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=D3appNkR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.43 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="D3appNkR" Received: by mail-ot1-f43.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-6ea2f95ec67so2867026a34.2; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 05:22:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1713356534; x=1713961334; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=r01JeIowVP/LWyk0N5hwlS9X40SHgKNE7NAoAweOa44=; b=D3appNkRZLbQPoYoIuRdHoQ0V1JERPId6mE4APE+weEN/Z6SAabm97AwOcCJgqCEa5 0xb5RSvEc3lwxgJJYkkhKQS3aEfSFtbjuSf3Wd1Y0/7dp4IsFrP+Swtm9COrbc2Sq6GT XOPvoVS8N3g+AT77GdZ0FkThLb46OBmOiDFeV/O5mr1YGnwMaRUPJCiX+CdW6rbfk2kT zScfL2y4cgP6ndcNQ1ufeqTfHjEyv4G+k8eoWVlS8elH8tTXeQudlZL/pXSHKBzUnj2F TXOqi+kMOwDrGfHiNw+pO8Wxmr6U9h64eIkx7xPRfoz2jEmmrnk6XkRN0Qy9lrt+90eZ PdZA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713356534; x=1713961334; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=r01JeIowVP/LWyk0N5hwlS9X40SHgKNE7NAoAweOa44=; b=jwAf33QrSh+ED5+94YSFJ8Sn002Y2VotGJOol9hX1ZxzhiuCWtfJ2f83B40R41rGDt Zi9czqgSbBrsaF8QHLugjMxpVgD2PO+VsAh7e2hZDnDrzmpfurKxV4PPd6ZNnS7qG1EO sT8da1qmBs7dvkWEthJG3Q7gdvOU5Z8tCvh4vbnu3GEq64nTr/zZtOAEQo3gc2JTeub5 P4dgYSe6pDghI/6auuSG/Fe1KjySCYmc3zBiVavxL8ZggOxXyameDobF78yQYtS/mlcx NjGSqCrOq70X2BNAD9UdTiEg/8AO2eQoecWqohrBY7b+vxFpu8rNnRYdGj8lKOfvvPqD JFBA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWZNwOaeFeMu1GUZc8kzgXvvNTIWcNOkJDRJx8tm0wAp3KV6BcuE1A7ncOmIhqIcdtYRn/dqKZhnzUGPE9CWvTHJKSu8JacQkhVp5h/OtPcY6N1G45mOuupzywI2QVbZxtyJKVTDqre X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxZmqOLmzYRNYyxeu1Vb8NYqdHcwKhuD468XTwGtjX1OvgYSNIG F4kXE6/uvy5ths/OHNzao7TWex32tvISUiZNBuCeGg19vUA84h0v X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGLoiqjcjiRF/T66uGJfinnCondW9gD4nSCRJDv1UIWWlO41HvlhlYxHS4cKCwiAhUSg/6LvA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:45a1:b0:221:8e01:4c6f with SMTP id y33-20020a05687045a100b002218e014c6fmr19834721oao.36.1713356533744; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 05:22:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([43.132.141.3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j3-20020a635503000000b005e83b64021fsm10361649pgb.25.2024.04.17.05.22.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 17 Apr 2024 05:22:13 -0700 (PDT) From: alexjlzheng@gmail.com X-Google-Original-From: alexjlzheng@tencent.com To: david@fromorbit.com Cc: chandan.babu@oracle.com, djwong@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jinliang Zheng Subject: [PATCH v3 RESEND] xfs: remove redundant batch variables for serialization Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 20:07:35 +0800 Message-Id: <20240417120734.853960-1-alexjlzheng@tencent.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.3 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Jinliang Zheng Historically, when generic percpu counters were introduced in xfs for free block counters by commit 0d485ada404b ("xfs: use generic percpu counters for free block counter"), the counters used a custom batch size. In xfs_mod_freecounter(), originally named xfs_mod_fdblocks(), this patch attempted to serialize the program using a smaller batch size as parameter to the addition function as the counter approaches 0. Commit 8c1903d3081a ("xfs: inode and free block counters need to use __percpu_counter_compare") pointed out the error in commit 0d485ada404b ("xfs: use generic percpu counters for free block counter") mentioned above and said that "Because the counters use a custom batch size, the comparison functions need to be aware of that batch size otherwise the comparison does not work correctly". Then percpu_counter_compare() was replaced with __percpu_counter_compare() with parameter XFS_FDBLOCKS_BATCH. After commit 8c1903d3081a ("xfs: inode and free block counters need to use __percpu_counter_compare"), the existence of the batch variable is no longer necessary, so this patch is proposed to simplify the code by removing it. Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng --- Changelog: v3: Resend for the second time=20 v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20230918043344.890817-1-alexjlzheng@t= encent.com/ v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20230908235713.GP28202@frogsfrogsfrog= s/T/#t --- fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 17 +---------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c index aed5be5508fe..8e47a3040893 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c @@ -1144,7 +1144,6 @@ xfs_mod_freecounter( int64_t lcounter; long long res_used; uint64_t set_aside =3D 0; - s32 batch; bool has_resv_pool; =20 ASSERT(counter =3D=3D &mp->m_fdblocks || counter =3D=3D &mp->m_frextents); @@ -1177,20 +1176,6 @@ xfs_mod_freecounter( return 0; } =20 - /* - * Taking blocks away, need to be more accurate the closer we - * are to zero. - * - * If the counter has a value of less than 2 * max batch size, - * then make everything serialise as we are real close to - * ENOSPC. - */ - if (__percpu_counter_compare(counter, 2 * XFS_FDBLOCKS_BATCH, - XFS_FDBLOCKS_BATCH) < 0) - batch =3D 1; - else - batch =3D XFS_FDBLOCKS_BATCH; - /* * Set aside allocbt blocks because these blocks are tracked as free * space but not available for allocation. Technically this means that a @@ -1204,7 +1189,7 @@ xfs_mod_freecounter( */ if (has_resv_pool) set_aside =3D xfs_fdblocks_unavailable(mp); - percpu_counter_add_batch(counter, delta, batch); + percpu_counter_add_batch(counter, delta, XFS_FDBLOCKS_BATCH); if (__percpu_counter_compare(counter, set_aside, XFS_FDBLOCKS_BATCH) >=3D 0) { /* we had space! */ --=20 2.39.3