From nobody Fri Dec 19 21:47:03 2025 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC81A4D58E for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 22:46:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712789202; cv=none; b=oNiBew9yxB97TiucGAlH8qoVspee9Ql+T9mb3ugGITUX5nwjtDSusrRYTeFlZ+hxxLl024hRe1Pf7wTPDCnoqQmqfYofr5si2Ku08nvgSZYZr39iFlqiUs9i8/Bi0LciF9HZUKqbEqSrin7Feqyxf/QlYt4xFmqSep2jsfcB3Fs= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712789202; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dqa4y3Sy5EE+IYLFY+hDqiZngky6H6vw41xP99gkF3Q=; h=Message-ID:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Date; b=eDSUhJJVUnOdnMmHamtCazFSzLmgHosGiRBRo6bn4/zLgL75qIILKXGwk295lOQ9Guxr79QnjVWAkguAVxIA5GZCJ87w6eV8PSKtos90kFsaD/uafhHsX6FD8+Twwb6gpWo/gzur6e72OC8F2Ug15FM1vHP5QVYXC70xLhZGyYg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=N2STrY0D; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=X5ggaPAH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="N2STrY0D"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="X5ggaPAH" Message-ID: <20240410165551.881137309@linutronix.de> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1712789198; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: references:references; bh=4hHoBY9MrEXBowGP0DzQQAtC7OGDF1Jxkr/5VDlxgmk=; b=N2STrY0Dwm2Mv5xsMFM/qy1ueCHSxZo6g49pE4uzGHGWWRNPY/FOupisQimKKzAFxsLfXv yCSH8TTkyTcmV9KVpv8+3RY03uZPiHFk/HY3k00cGQkyaZkOlFrtJYUfExlkfWpA52+9Dl 9mpUjr6i2VuCWwaurhfUsRgD04jPFO+/dw4KCmff5kcVPKzfycqja5te8hLJKXLx2iQcQn JfiG/9J1cn6rTEWatb/KsImn+ZyJSb6vLbpyHaSuCRauFb1u7hqlPJ3yQOBSmRdC8BYXK1 bxesIYyvgUJ9CF83uw77EMbCo1QLvrxKN1k75F8/Hg/6jSN5VQgnz9z/e4vs2w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1712789198; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: references:references; bh=4hHoBY9MrEXBowGP0DzQQAtC7OGDF1Jxkr/5VDlxgmk=; b=X5ggaPAHzS4RVSwb2VElGPi4Oa+EfCt/7GP8daM3Yeb7m67qmJrsPjntYCqWbo/LO3BPnw qBb2q/R2hTROa9Cw== From: Thomas Gleixner To: LKML Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen , Frederic Weisbecker , John Stultz , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Stephen Boyd , Eric Biederman , Oleg Nesterov Subject: [patch V2 15/50] posix-cpu-timers: Remove incorrect comment in posix_cpu_timer_set() References: <20240410164558.316665885@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 00:46:38 +0200 (CEST) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" A leftover from historical code which describes fiction. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker --- kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 7 +------ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c +++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c @@ -689,13 +689,8 @@ static int posix_cpu_timer_set(struct k_ __posix_cpu_timer_get(timer, old, now); } =20 + /* Retry if the timer expiry is running concurrently */ if (unlikely(ret)) { - /* - * We are colliding with the timer actually firing. - * Punt after filling in the timer's old value, and - * disable this firing since we are already reporting - * it as an overrun (thanks to bump_cpu_timer above). - */ unlock_task_sighand(p, &flags); goto out; }