From nobody Thu Feb 12 11:50:07 2026 Received: from mail-4322.protonmail.ch (mail-4322.protonmail.ch [185.70.43.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6309C58AA3 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 22:43:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.70.43.22 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712097835; cv=none; b=jZyXJYTNKc5oI74VbGx7JmEXgtAmu9r47+EFk7qdmFFjL1KBXGzTJgvus7CkvJcgu1CetG3DKIilqR7pyt+sw4hlhbmeLIFHRP3Xm96CJIecJdeBj61tMWqH8M1DKU8riRSeRC3AYFQWrBLIj4ZsbGeQypHoSUv5BNhquR0T5FM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712097835; c=relaxed/simple; bh=M5g/fcmIVnd03cJua4t7cktQpdvhmTWTKnPw4RyHuwI=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZJJt9l+9/VZdnrgPDsZIlUsCFrK68o9PyHJ4yOWccJVPHghGiMorHC0lfB2aMzpxj8/u4hb8T4ztiaXj/2GWOfSUiiFHe2fMw3QJO0wDEP1liMoGHrNT+Xn5uGONob/RjX3WTDOiO/wYuIfAua06jfP3+U3oDUoRw+WAVNcBDq4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=pm.me; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pm.me; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pm.me header.i=@pm.me header.b=Zgn2BYNt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.70.43.22 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=pm.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pm.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pm.me header.i=@pm.me header.b="Zgn2BYNt" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pm.me; s=protonmail3; t=1712097826; x=1712357026; bh=M5g/fcmIVnd03cJua4t7cktQpdvhmTWTKnPw4RyHuwI=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=Zgn2BYNtEub2wOHTZ512OSFsjW68aYTqzJJMvtctlN9DvmKOJswdeE/AKPPtCrHft JoEop76LObx7G4aBep/eIHaCWDmIHwcVvisu8YbIb+sMB1zXPP9sgJcPCDYoMZhnPZ uZPWRfJi/0hb8PJe6Mk93PMXzeThkhWFwj43Vq1fYTE38in3CmwDka7C+Vf4YwheLD DavkTtg/ozn5nKf2znzu5jWjwYQGVLF7Mw8lIhqli7eXk+wPY3xUt8rAYnfhacNZ8p NUVHv+WPXlzv1w2waG/gUmFsnnY1wseeRuRzQ+TiXWxQ/SvcwqY0nSTboJpl04+8T7 PzMBqQoXKirqQ== Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 22:43:43 +0000 To: Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Nicolas Devos Cc: Nicolas Devos Subject: [PATCH 3/4] gpu/drm: Prefer `unsigned int` over `unsigned` Message-ID: <20240402224320.12146-4-ndevos-dev@pm.me> In-Reply-To: <20240402224320.12146-1-ndevos-dev@pm.me> References: <20240402224320.12146-1-ndevos-dev@pm.me> Feedback-ID: 76711691:user:proton Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" This commit fixes following checkpatch warning: WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' Signed-off-by: Nicolas Devos --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connecto= r.c index 6d8f0fc905f3..de71805aab2c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c @@ -2076,7 +2076,7 @@ int drm_connector_attach_scaling_mode_property(struct= drm_connector *connector, struct drm_device *dev =3D connector->dev; struct drm_property *scaling_mode_property; int i; - const unsigned valid_scaling_mode_mask =3D + const unsigned int valid_scaling_mode_mask =3D (1U << ARRAY_SIZE(drm_scaling_mode_enum_list)) - 1; =20 if (WARN_ON(hweight32(scaling_mode_mask) < 2 || --=20 2.42.0