From nobody Sat Feb 7 15:10:19 2026 Received: from mail-yb1-f202.google.com (mail-yb1-f202.google.com [209.85.219.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 674EB57303 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 23:44:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.219.202 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712015092; cv=none; b=BzJJ8lX59F/DlsfUUuptr/4HdYCCyNNgMrsboUaIJS0Cs3jJGKy0bIADutf7M8/VTYIiXQf8+GYHVfnL4D/gDNS/O6N4TCX3FLj5UDzmf/x3kIuUSTEzPxr8/np3pkq6IfdQF+pvo+Mwtpz3x2mMv/t/XxR7cbvkHB7G1onTtQw= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712015092; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GJCzqLd1yU21/5EPUVg1kQYMudOQPgbVDPdJvDi8PaQ=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=c66UOiGd71P8l1I0L8j4QDqQgPPrvjctmTOq5YwUeBr8iJzcA8zEHGR6pK5MFvO6R7wj4pmSWdC69pSe9u56yJw4h876vKVPgq5lL50CxiIuLfkbjOkUJSy2d6pkrV6M6Q8G/nkv8mpy5XTLl7jx8qAErUgpA8QGEqEujR+mzE0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--jstultz.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=PCxsmhEr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.219.202 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--jstultz.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="PCxsmhEr" Received: by mail-yb1-f202.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-dc6b26ce0bbso8402531276.1 for ; Mon, 01 Apr 2024 16:44:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1712015089; x=1712619889; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=FtDbcV8zlQF7rqL76sToUaoMwq0dV5ffqW3dTh0qD/M=; b=PCxsmhErcKnp6WFH0TV2Kn4roKWDqC+yCfZ2HbNBCW3ZtdHBXDjNIFK3Om5mv0/rOf CsVBcj6PCqDEsiynHLkpTBgL185p9r0uhvoOmwFy85v6PblAqpyusg5UznJ5GyOHfdzw WzXfTXQTByCrs5FHY8zmtehkv6OujnaUTGY7aqcUleBAqe2oWCVOAMIiHHxvqZukdFLi fpI7a9OaqTMmV0wu89+Q6ARHdx6BAhJtbJe0LsCHc38nyWESV6WPCllcgIhYk0m64rC9 9gAlYiDS+4g1Y9tM/Lg2YX3TUJfgB4KthWh9wtlNc+hy9WriMJoevn5HWNajGeP3PVKd FI8A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712015089; x=1712619889; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=FtDbcV8zlQF7rqL76sToUaoMwq0dV5ffqW3dTh0qD/M=; b=orZLsIM7O9YzEHS+VQ64tv7RPuK5sSV6JVrgCnL1VeZkMSSvIkgeRYn1rm+puUR85w DMd3QAe/zmOdx6BSo4W3M4iEE1hJAwyGdpf59KOi3PIJqtzOQWLzht3YAWQyLGrsYkFT zRqNNIOLVMBJVkO14Pj6XbT7ozeHep0W4DbloviEvXfmoDVWDYGzdfAndfhYZbMzMJDw 7AifTkjGCf/XFpUEHP+H7EKORv8ZOiFXW0vySSqsgHhSJiMuimYENg/ooS+3dtl/J997 h+fy8Kalm6EmaFJyNBH73/WYs4Iqf2bYHvSEuVQY6NygOZ6dX98IZzPcmqTgTPGv3TXe ncTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyIZPTTy2Ihnb9WiA4ENY99CEe3G/3X6g/b4nhx/mhb71hLel7d LnxwUwfadF15XgGVOti1odHVI0wCck3PMYCLpdpYNNMZQi4+Xr0BF+x7pKrveRm8vWl/WKBRLgk Jyktc4Gw7jf3vmDlmIKsACpKg6F5rIymT8Z+NTK2AEvoK7InDpAZTZAP/QCjkLJQ2NM1QsXPfa7 58KpEuWkYH5lbHFA2b32Hw3w1OGn0m80hxepQ2fuZMTtiz X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEXLy7BY3eDJSf/IRWvnNlatFoOAFLtCpqCcmS+lzq8AeEejmhn/wBh9AliUVn+3KJNU3r11J0B5lbk X-Received: from jstultz-noogler2.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:24:72f4:c0a8:600]) (user=jstultz job=sendgmr) by 2002:a05:6902:1009:b0:dc6:ff2b:7e1b with SMTP id w9-20020a056902100900b00dc6ff2b7e1bmr3581710ybt.4.1712015089339; Mon, 01 Apr 2024 16:44:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 16:44:23 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20240401234439.834544-1-jstultz@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20240401234439.834544-1-jstultz@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.44.0.478.gd926399ef9-goog Message-ID: <20240401234439.834544-2-jstultz@google.com> Subject: [RESEND][PATCH v9 1/7] locking/mutex: Remove wakeups from under mutex::wait_lock From: John Stultz To: LKML Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Joel Fernandes , Qais Yousef , Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Valentin Schneider , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Zimuzo Ezeozue , Youssef Esmat , Mel Gorman , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Will Deacon , Waiman Long , Boqun Feng , "Paul E. McKenney" , Metin Kaya , Xuewen Yan , K Prateek Nayak , Thomas Gleixner , kernel-team@android.com, Davidlohr Bueso , John Stultz Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Peter Zijlstra In preparation to nest mutex::wait_lock under rq::lock we need to remove wakeups from under it. Cc: Joel Fernandes Cc: Qais Yousef Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Juri Lelli Cc: Vincent Guittot Cc: Dietmar Eggemann Cc: Valentin Schneider Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Ben Segall Cc: Zimuzo Ezeozue Cc: Youssef Esmat Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Waiman Long Cc: Boqun Feng Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Metin Kaya Cc: Xuewen Yan Cc: K Prateek Nayak Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: kernel-team@android.com Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) [Heavily changed after 55f036ca7e74 ("locking: WW mutex cleanup") and 08295b3b5bee ("locking: Implement an algorithm choice for Wound-Wait mutexes")] Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli [jstultz: rebased to mainline, added extra wake_up_q & init to avoid hangs, similar to Connor's rework of this patch] Signed-off-by: John Stultz --- v5: * Reverted back to an earlier version of this patch to undo the change that kept the wake_q in the ctx structure, as that broke the rule that the wake_q must always be on the stack, as its not safe for concurrency. v6: * Made tweaks suggested by Waiman Long v7: * Fixups to pass wake_qs down for PREEMPT_RT logic --- kernel/locking/mutex.c | 17 +++++++++++++---- kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++--------- kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c | 4 +++- kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 4 ++-- kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c | 3 ++- kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h | 29 ++++++++++++++++++----------- 6 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c index cbae8c0b89ab..980ce630232c 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c @@ -575,6 +575,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int st= ate, unsigned int subclas struct lockdep_map *nest_lock, unsigned long ip, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, const bool use_ww_ctx) { + DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q); struct mutex_waiter waiter; struct ww_mutex *ww; int ret; @@ -625,7 +626,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int st= ate, unsigned int subclas */ if (__mutex_trylock(lock)) { if (ww_ctx) - __ww_mutex_check_waiters(lock, ww_ctx); + __ww_mutex_check_waiters(lock, ww_ctx, &wake_q); =20 goto skip_wait; } @@ -645,7 +646,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int st= ate, unsigned int subclas * Add in stamp order, waking up waiters that must kill * themselves. */ - ret =3D __ww_mutex_add_waiter(&waiter, lock, ww_ctx); + ret =3D __ww_mutex_add_waiter(&waiter, lock, ww_ctx, &wake_q); if (ret) goto err_early_kill; } @@ -681,6 +682,11 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int s= tate, unsigned int subclas } =20 raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + /* Make sure we do wakeups before calling schedule */ + if (!wake_q_empty(&wake_q)) { + wake_up_q(&wake_q); + wake_q_init(&wake_q); + } schedule_preempt_disabled(); =20 first =3D __mutex_waiter_is_first(lock, &waiter); @@ -714,7 +720,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int st= ate, unsigned int subclas */ if (!ww_ctx->is_wait_die && !__mutex_waiter_is_first(lock, &waiter)) - __ww_mutex_check_waiters(lock, ww_ctx); + __ww_mutex_check_waiters(lock, ww_ctx, &wake_q); } =20 __mutex_remove_waiter(lock, &waiter); @@ -730,6 +736,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int st= ate, unsigned int subclas ww_mutex_lock_acquired(ww, ww_ctx); =20 raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + wake_up_q(&wake_q); preempt_enable(); return 0; =20 @@ -741,6 +748,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int st= ate, unsigned int subclas raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); debug_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter); mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, ip); + wake_up_q(&wake_q); preempt_enable(); return ret; } @@ -934,6 +942,7 @@ static noinline void __sched __mutex_unlock_slowpath(st= ruct mutex *lock, unsigne } } =20 + preempt_disable(); raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); debug_mutex_unlock(lock); if (!list_empty(&lock->wait_list)) { @@ -952,8 +961,8 @@ static noinline void __sched __mutex_unlock_slowpath(st= ruct mutex *lock, unsigne __mutex_handoff(lock, next); =20 raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); - wake_up_q(&wake_q); + preempt_enable(); } =20 #ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c index 88d08eeb8bc0..59f17e7ccf89 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c @@ -34,13 +34,15 @@ =20 static inline int __ww_mutex_add_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, struct rt_mutex *lock, - struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { return 0; } =20 static inline void __ww_mutex_check_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock, - struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { } =20 @@ -1207,6 +1209,7 @@ static int __sched task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_= mutex_base *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *top_waiter =3D waiter; struct rt_mutex_base *next_lock; int chain_walk =3D 0, res; + DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q); =20 lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); =20 @@ -1245,7 +1248,8 @@ static int __sched task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_= mutex_base *lock, =20 /* Check whether the waiter should back out immediately */ rtm =3D container_of(lock, struct rt_mutex, rtmutex); - res =3D __ww_mutex_add_waiter(waiter, rtm, ww_ctx); + res =3D __ww_mutex_add_waiter(waiter, rtm, ww_ctx, &wake_q); + wake_up_q(&wake_q); if (res) { raw_spin_lock(&task->pi_lock); rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter); @@ -1678,7 +1682,8 @@ static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mute= x_base *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, unsigned int state, enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk, - struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { struct rt_mutex *rtm =3D container_of(lock, struct rt_mutex, rtmutex); struct ww_mutex *ww =3D ww_container_of(rtm); @@ -1689,7 +1694,7 @@ static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mute= x_base *lock, /* Try to acquire the lock again: */ if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, NULL)) { if (build_ww_mutex() && ww_ctx) { - __ww_mutex_check_waiters(rtm, ww_ctx); + __ww_mutex_check_waiters(rtm, ww_ctx, wake_q); ww_mutex_lock_acquired(ww, ww_ctx); } return 0; @@ -1707,7 +1712,7 @@ static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mute= x_base *lock, /* acquired the lock */ if (build_ww_mutex() && ww_ctx) { if (!ww_ctx->is_wait_die) - __ww_mutex_check_waiters(rtm, ww_ctx); + __ww_mutex_check_waiters(rtm, ww_ctx, wake_q); ww_mutex_lock_acquired(ww, ww_ctx); } } else { @@ -1729,7 +1734,8 @@ static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mute= x_base *lock, =20 static inline int __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, - unsigned int state) + unsigned int state, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter; int ret; @@ -1738,7 +1744,7 @@ static inline int __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(struct r= t_mutex_base *lock, waiter.ww_ctx =3D ww_ctx; =20 ret =3D __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, ww_ctx, state, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, - &waiter); + &waiter, wake_q); =20 debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter); return ret; @@ -1754,6 +1760,7 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_= base *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, unsigned int state) { + DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q); unsigned long flags; int ret; =20 @@ -1775,8 +1782,9 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_= base *lock, * irqsave/restore variants. */ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags); - ret =3D __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(lock, ww_ctx, state); + ret =3D __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(lock, ww_ctx, state, &wake_q); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags); + wake_up_q(&wake_q); rt_mutex_post_schedule(); =20 return ret; diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c b/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c index 34a59569db6b..e9d2f38b70f3 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ static int __sched __rwbase_read_lock(struct rwbase_rt *r= wb, unsigned int state) { struct rt_mutex_base *rtm =3D &rwb->rtmutex; + DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q); int ret; =20 rwbase_pre_schedule(); @@ -110,7 +111,7 @@ static int __sched __rwbase_read_lock(struct rwbase_rt = *rwb, * For rwlocks this returns 0 unconditionally, so the below * !ret conditionals are optimized out. */ - ret =3D rwbase_rtmutex_slowlock_locked(rtm, state); + ret =3D rwbase_rtmutex_slowlock_locked(rtm, state, &wake_q); =20 /* * On success the rtmutex is held, so there can't be a writer @@ -122,6 +123,7 @@ static int __sched __rwbase_read_lock(struct rwbase_rt = *rwb, if (!ret) atomic_inc(&rwb->readers); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rtm->wait_lock); + wake_up_q(&wake_q); if (!ret) rwbase_rtmutex_unlock(rtm); =20 diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c index c6d17aee4209..79ab7b8df5c1 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c @@ -1415,8 +1415,8 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaph= ore *sem) #define rwbase_rtmutex_lock_state(rtm, state) \ __rt_mutex_lock(rtm, state) =20 -#define rwbase_rtmutex_slowlock_locked(rtm, state) \ - __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(rtm, NULL, state) +#define rwbase_rtmutex_slowlock_locked(rtm, state, wq) \ + __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(rtm, NULL, state, wq) =20 #define rwbase_rtmutex_unlock(rtm) \ __rt_mutex_unlock(rtm) diff --git a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c index 38e292454fcc..fb1810a14c9d 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c +++ b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c @@ -162,7 +162,8 @@ rwbase_rtmutex_lock_state(struct rt_mutex_base *rtm, un= signed int state) } =20 static __always_inline int -rwbase_rtmutex_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *rtm, unsigned int sta= te) +rwbase_rtmutex_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *rtm, unsigned int sta= te, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { rtlock_slowlock_locked(rtm); return 0; diff --git a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h index 3ad2cc4823e5..7189c6631d90 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h +++ b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ __ww_ctx_less(struct ww_acquire_ctx *a, struct ww_acqui= re_ctx *b) */ static bool __ww_mutex_die(struct MUTEX *lock, struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter, - struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { if (!ww_ctx->is_wait_die) return false; @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ __ww_mutex_die(struct MUTEX *lock, struct MUTEX_WAITER = *waiter, #ifndef WW_RT debug_mutex_wake_waiter(lock, waiter); #endif - wake_up_process(waiter->task); + wake_q_add(wake_q, waiter->task); } =20 return true; @@ -299,7 +299,8 @@ __ww_mutex_die(struct MUTEX *lock, struct MUTEX_WAITER = *waiter, */ static bool __ww_mutex_wound(struct MUTEX *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, - struct ww_acquire_ctx *hold_ctx) + struct ww_acquire_ctx *hold_ctx, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { struct task_struct *owner =3D __ww_mutex_owner(lock); =20 @@ -331,7 +332,7 @@ static bool __ww_mutex_wound(struct MUTEX *lock, * wakeup pending to re-read the wounded state. */ if (owner !=3D current) - wake_up_process(owner); + wake_q_add(wake_q, owner); =20 return true; } @@ -352,7 +353,8 @@ static bool __ww_mutex_wound(struct MUTEX *lock, * The current task must not be on the wait list. */ static void -__ww_mutex_check_waiters(struct MUTEX *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) +__ww_mutex_check_waiters(struct MUTEX *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { struct MUTEX_WAITER *cur; =20 @@ -364,8 +366,8 @@ __ww_mutex_check_waiters(struct MUTEX *lock, struct ww_= acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) if (!cur->ww_ctx) continue; =20 - if (__ww_mutex_die(lock, cur, ww_ctx) || - __ww_mutex_wound(lock, cur->ww_ctx, ww_ctx)) + if (__ww_mutex_die(lock, cur, ww_ctx, wake_q) || + __ww_mutex_wound(lock, cur->ww_ctx, ww_ctx, wake_q)) break; } } @@ -377,6 +379,8 @@ __ww_mutex_check_waiters(struct MUTEX *lock, struct ww_= acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) static __always_inline void ww_mutex_set_context_fastpath(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx= *ctx) { + DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q); + ww_mutex_lock_acquired(lock, ctx); =20 /* @@ -405,8 +409,10 @@ ww_mutex_set_context_fastpath(struct ww_mutex *lock, s= truct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx) * die or wound us. */ lock_wait_lock(&lock->base); - __ww_mutex_check_waiters(&lock->base, ctx); + __ww_mutex_check_waiters(&lock->base, ctx, &wake_q); unlock_wait_lock(&lock->base); + + wake_up_q(&wake_q); } =20 static __always_inline int @@ -488,7 +494,8 @@ __ww_mutex_check_kill(struct MUTEX *lock, struct MUTEX_= WAITER *waiter, static inline int __ww_mutex_add_waiter(struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter, struct MUTEX *lock, - struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { struct MUTEX_WAITER *cur, *pos =3D NULL; bool is_wait_die; @@ -532,7 +539,7 @@ __ww_mutex_add_waiter(struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter, pos =3D cur; =20 /* Wait-Die: ensure younger waiters die. */ - __ww_mutex_die(lock, cur, ww_ctx); + __ww_mutex_die(lock, cur, ww_ctx, wake_q); } =20 __ww_waiter_add(lock, waiter, pos); @@ -550,7 +557,7 @@ __ww_mutex_add_waiter(struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter, * such that either we or the fastpath will wound @ww->ctx. */ smp_mb(); - __ww_mutex_wound(lock, ww_ctx, ww->ctx); + __ww_mutex_wound(lock, ww_ctx, ww->ctx, wake_q); } =20 return 0; --=20 2.44.0.478.gd926399ef9-goog