From nobody Mon Feb 9 02:55:55 2026 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com (szxga05-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.191]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65BEB443D for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 06:38:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.191 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710398322; cv=none; b=C1721Cbi8YBeXLRjrbNr9CktJMQpKg+zkIqcmO6lk4659uI10woqj8GJtrvRep63nHxQLrFGNkqDfaUnBi9ky+p6jBdfKpSsYEaXxCBYuzJU1d4uBkXCcj/83uj3L+x76vJLXRbmtsXJUJI4BdIiS2cF3vLAeWfCIsO8Wm2HN9g= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710398322; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ncxPhRMMpfqp9OzQjoy4dcGCuf78mFoSFqMSDKndVh0=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VRoHxDkbnK7um6yBztwLmZy1VuhrHxyn5jzPy8CN06tUpBgq0QTHZ/Pmp/UsDxqX5x0ZAoovYv3rHTITuDfFcjq5J1dK/ZHRlO+1kC/hH+XmsrUO4zFkMm6ARflGQbCBlNRMHBN1dPPSX2rJ1j3G9WWO+B+nGQMA0+HOXBcfj+s= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.191 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.234]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TwHkz0PqWz1FMPL; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:38:19 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EA7E1400DB; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:38:35 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.90.53.73) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:38:35 +0800 From: Jinjie Ruan To: , , , , , CC: Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Remove unnecessary irqflags alternative.h include Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:38:19 +0800 Message-ID: <20240314063819.2636445-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Since commit 20af807d806d ("arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING"), the alternative.h include is not used, so remove it. Fixes: 20af807d806d ("arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_GIC_= PRIO_MASKING") Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan --- arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq= flags.h index 0a7186a93882..d4d7451c2c12 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h @@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ #ifndef __ASM_IRQFLAGS_H #define __ASM_IRQFLAGS_H =20 -#include #include #include #include --=20 2.34.1