From nobody Fri Dec 19 06:17:54 2025 Received: from out-180.mta1.migadu.com (out-180.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 517A545032 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:52:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.180 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708782778; cv=none; b=Ks5Y+fuA+CzrdXgA0Vd4Tp5JVMNOKjbckKGSaUusJv+Er05uFnzfvOvQyw9I7xAZmWy4XzNeN5kMJmIKNhI76rDC6lM+YxzSk5CQ/NNeZLhzKmrV3pmyd3VcVzoqg51W7Tn9TTTht2YOB5BA+2mAbupPIWbLHkZrQkczo7YXvHQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708782778; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4xCZ87ofqhn+mZ02rNDXeZZ2CvHmguZE2SQHPTimieg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=Q5EW6WUeZlLepCSTH0Ycd59gWaCYgy9zQ2dgTxmZdf/K5vJsaU7AJnjcVXySXCsj6ooOSw08nHGzypNLxctfmK5l7JaG4FBMpN4d+GNaX+Zwl5DjqEN+g5oGNMmlCqS9FD3ktZUAEIBVmyE1fS7+71ZgIUAyhmDALTdsIpBcl+k= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=KNTFUq2Q; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.180 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="KNTFUq2Q" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1708782775; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rYMFkq+ll6ODceL4IY+KD8y0LqHupyUnLzlW6j2Pb6w=; b=KNTFUq2QJy/ueeF02jeVLU72xmH5hB/LrAA+RGSQojawOzHq+kjLaykiwftObxZNmaH7Z8 CniIlrxATBnpQQsmw3Goc0XLlEG684Abi+y9B0WQKvUBj9fhvXEZHYcqw9QgazP1d/y52P 3T5rQywS0TQ25Fd3SFEIbDG4pYzCMxs= From: chengming.zhou@linux.dev To: dushistov@mail.ru Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, vbabka@suse.cz, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, Xiongwei.Song@windriver.com, chengming.zhou@linux.dev, Chengming Zhou Subject: [PATCH] ufs: remove SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag usage Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:52:43 +0000 Message-Id: <20240224135243.830381-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Chengming Zhou The SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag is already a no-op as of 6.8-rc1, remove its usage so we can delete it from slab. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou --- fs/ufs/super.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ufs/super.c b/fs/ufs/super.c index a480810cd4e3..126295a9bb70 100644 --- a/fs/ufs/super.c +++ b/fs/ufs/super.c @@ -1470,8 +1470,7 @@ static int __init init_inodecache(void) { ufs_inode_cachep =3D kmem_cache_create_usercopy("ufs_inode_cache", sizeof(struct ufs_inode_info), 0, - (SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT|SLAB_MEM_SPREAD| - SLAB_ACCOUNT), + SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT|SLAB_ACCOUNT, offsetof(struct ufs_inode_info, i_u1.i_symlink), sizeof_field(struct ufs_inode_info, i_u1.i_symlink), --=20 2.40.1