From nobody Fri Dec 19 04:06:51 2025 Received: from out-176.mta1.migadu.com (out-176.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91C2B51C4D for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:52:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.176 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708782766; cv=none; b=vAFeCohTZ5b/Bn1bzE/bvg0vFI/bEeR4JwTQrSwNeNImYc6x0TK6LxoaLAhclGTSCXxILeJGrCCjMVAGRd2A54l2Pl5WdBmFteGIQFyNzl9HgNbUnN32MgoNu408LrwJjbQkAQIPpSqt9VVHbgDRyb6kQ1gfhj1rKZqUAT2ecF0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708782766; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0w+HfXhDLJYSWTbKNdiUF24fjGbx/cau0omwIMYpSRo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=MjFE/GdS2xcVoHQy7UDlJUjKFEee7614WddJZvV5/OiuRoPpakZF3qI9XNVkehllmnfMimOfnPZX4WKVPFfXDe0LDSsfadW+nE5BzJsrv1sZn4kqf7r3jHv+nXMW9CHGuXNeomsYBws5IdS9r8cN4NCuG5JhB5+owEBA9rZHuRo= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=gu7Lvroj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.176 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="gu7Lvroj" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1708782763; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mXj0flxlBa8suq19xooxsemKwp/hQv6FgMgJ88zOfL4=; b=gu7LvrojhDeXhS4C/2tcUJexYlLdYQDYoABf0DbXfz+szLPnlPukerV2ISuq6StBhn5cuQ mXzsauikz5NeGrcPj+Bgdu0mZhMxqe0WIYBxQoqzsKGKvtv/UiJUXQ4+QvPiZa/+ash3vh 2PPOCmVIzE0Mptj7zQzCSqlrUoP1Db0= From: chengming.zhou@linux.dev To: jack@suse.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, vbabka@suse.cz, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, Xiongwei.Song@windriver.com, chengming.zhou@linux.dev, Chengming Zhou Subject: [PATCH] udf: remove SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag usage Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:52:29 +0000 Message-Id: <20240224135229.830356-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Chengming Zhou The SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag is already a no-op as of 6.8-rc1, remove its usage so we can delete it from slab. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou --- fs/udf/super.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/udf/super.c b/fs/udf/super.c index adb39e08b2f2..2217f7ed7a49 100644 --- a/fs/udf/super.c +++ b/fs/udf/super.c @@ -188,7 +188,6 @@ static int __init init_inodecache(void) udf_inode_cachep =3D kmem_cache_create("udf_inode_cache", sizeof(struct udf_inode_info), 0, (SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT | - SLAB_MEM_SPREAD | SLAB_ACCOUNT), init_once); if (!udf_inode_cachep) --=20 2.40.1