From nobody Sat Feb 7 11:10:37 2026 Received: from out-181.mta0.migadu.com (out-181.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B80A7125C3 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.181 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708782712; cv=none; b=i7k5vVNZv7AqjqHknCv8bNh6xG++G8mxUrJ93a2TT3djAQAYbmlk/CmVG7y+NFyaAZedbsi/Kra1yZoY9Z6M7n0uuudpRgKHBYFsQpX/uvYom0BnOiIxzJ9Iymxi7U6N6kXGwM0kX3Yo9xSkpG+2UihCTsnxXRPDnpoWfq2IHf4= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708782712; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uatpp2XJ1Xg79pTa5FCK7wNpCIj04AEIsfpgHap5s2o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=YLWt4ieHcWivqp2glyyZl/eTPn/c+KSXSEesSvGVZ9XbVv51Onc5owNZl8/YqSFJuU3pjRMg2j/p1WjJ3C+KaQFEp8S31pkhyh0twTnMdROmf0FjKu7cB5T2uzBMFkgG8PiObXMSAhNnDYqb/RFactWAukWYZaS2lkAvsu88X7c= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=FACSaXwA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.181 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="FACSaXwA" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1708782709; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sLHtO33Ubm3a9KIWmkpmggib7Qf+tnLzeQj9fuz3h5Y=; b=FACSaXwArpMAxz8sFg5gm7MkF3MukXBrAtABPCHeq0SwH3bLwy8utrXt1lEiIEJHFoJlVY DBHj9Fpu1lEfbSSn4Ca8DRY2BLXo07Ohw4gXhGJ2ywNAMPZIFkGxY+/79HWqIaDUrOqAF+ jl+wGohkGliNF+NTX00CwEQUxw3jXC0= From: chengming.zhou@linux.dev To: brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, jlayton@kernel.org, zhouchengming@bytedance.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, vbabka@suse.cz, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, Xiongwei.Song@windriver.com, chengming.zhou@linux.dev Subject: [PATCH] romfs: remove SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag usage Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:51:43 +0000 Message-Id: <20240224135143.830142-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Chengming Zhou The SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag is already a no-op as of 6.8-rc1, remove its usage so we can delete it from slab. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou --- fs/romfs/super.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/romfs/super.c b/fs/romfs/super.c index 1ed468c03557..2be227532f39 100644 --- a/fs/romfs/super.c +++ b/fs/romfs/super.c @@ -630,8 +630,8 @@ static int __init init_romfs_fs(void) romfs_inode_cachep =3D kmem_cache_create("romfs_i", sizeof(struct romfs_inode_info), 0, - SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT | SLAB_MEM_SPREAD | - SLAB_ACCOUNT, romfs_i_init_once); + SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT | SLAB_ACCOUNT, + romfs_i_init_once); =20 if (!romfs_inode_cachep) { pr_err("Failed to initialise inode cache\n"); --=20 2.40.1