From nobody Sat Feb 7 17:48:14 2026 Received: from out-183.mta0.migadu.com (out-183.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B82CB47F58 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:49:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.183 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708782586; cv=none; b=jDCoq8ksiKusYTgR1Iflz0B7/NTfpTTMcjhuAoJ9kO+4m3II+lyW33OU4E3PBiJLz3zg78Np1epcITIinecf0wz/M0dLxaC8TdpjXN7G4oUnc7TlVv9+T72VRCZ06Z8dxrqONGBc2zbiXemY0d/ssfcyAImnht+qs0oVre3zt10= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708782586; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4MFdOxYZyXwnvdRHx0F3mEAjpWaAcsoYtGAnqfX0Rfw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=Nu4wk6xAMiznESrGEUTEHXAQsakdDeMC4wE+2T0PLZa20bmGa95C9HXbgDcnpX33YQfU+u2BGPDsLh4sS2HqYnEhbVleq2X0Jopb8pnfDL2btCH3oK+OC2vYT4tjMi0C3iGCEzDn5H40mxQm2VBLyrGo98aKyazvl0pnSY2pnJM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=StsvjdgX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.183 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="StsvjdgX" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1708782582; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=i4x53/DeAXqIuE63M4BYh0uJI9aRbpTRYh6DBcH50Cc=; b=StsvjdgXxJe3ET9i9V6PEo5Nq/3DBaGKQ59f34fgLmmQX0u2QLUxI1BjmE+QMkp6VR5PBj RiLlkC858MV0C52clfTPqdJ2f05iV8A3cxLpKZczKejWqgn7o8lNIvoHSABPjnS8gxZTmp coVThJqR/th/k3lVuN4SFdmO21PUvp8= From: chengming.zhou@linux.dev To: jlayton@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, zhouchengming@bytedance.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, vbabka@suse.cz, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, Xiongwei.Song@windriver.com, chengming.zhou@linux.dev Subject: [PATCH] minix: remove SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag usage Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:49:35 +0000 Message-Id: <20240224134935.829715-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Chengming Zhou The SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag is already a no-op as of 6.8-rc1, remove its usage so we can delete it from slab. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou --- fs/minix/inode.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/minix/inode.c b/fs/minix/inode.c index 73f37f298087..7cbd2b9f4d11 100644 --- a/fs/minix/inode.c +++ b/fs/minix/inode.c @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static int __init init_inodecache(void) minix_inode_cachep =3D kmem_cache_create("minix_inode_cache", sizeof(struct minix_inode_info), 0, (SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT| - SLAB_MEM_SPREAD|SLAB_ACCOUNT), + SLAB_ACCOUNT), init_once); if (minix_inode_cachep =3D=3D NULL) return -ENOMEM; --=20 2.40.1