From nobody Fri Dec 19 06:25:10 2025 Received: from out-173.mta0.migadu.com (out-173.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81DD94D59B for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:48:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.173 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708782536; cv=none; b=B8Is323zNZGz87jm9YkNRajmxVg0bCosKiZkQxGqC2p9RXgfVVHZnm/0KtPQ2162fUvDeK9+ncx8jKS3DG/CPCuIKD/fAuNqbLfsJf8QMJKwwg7vMRxoFCQhj4HqgVMspYyIp99N4QXCOJiZaAj07mlNFzbPEOz+IigrwomPuvI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708782536; c=relaxed/simple; bh=y2pUB53F1wMAZ04nzFKOITyd4dvsaa9cjjMHjK96d5Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=neITvV/zq4t1cDmWhXb0Q1LWciMLYUJitqLBfuZFuMT4KNk/zsinyibGbVkr4JqP1q8GHVGoYFJD7zRe1yXYwBKuVQVo/COxc5gKJz4o75CR2VHJldenzaIr6oTpDKCOL/i+iI+qJrMQZVFZp4uxFbQm1m21yUGZRSkRWndj9pY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=ms/zeVZy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="ms/zeVZy" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1708782534; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rikMo19CagWQcspLQnXP+zWMLIAYXL5i/D+P5ICzeiQ=; b=ms/zeVZyBJ5AE0Ryv8ygow1uTLiltSGM7YRvR9KT3WlR5UcXaXJ2GENMtdT3zBCI/rgEAi 7Un6qkTkajDJJz1lIJvGijrmeMRnBu0hxFcnrv7SnqsUwrkhmKNVidnFyzzCNgBYMcN+OW FGzABBKfQhgjeZNO9TeKoMOlyLu98BY= From: chengming.zhou@linux.dev To: agruenba@redhat.com Cc: gfs2@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, vbabka@suse.cz, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, Xiongwei.Song@windriver.com, chengming.zhou@linux.dev, Chengming Zhou Subject: [PATCH] gfs2: remove SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag usage Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:48:47 +0000 Message-Id: <20240224134847.829536-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Chengming Zhou The SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag is already a no-op as of 6.8-rc1, remove its usage so we can delete it from slab. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou --- fs/gfs2/main.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/gfs2/main.c b/fs/gfs2/main.c index 79be0cdc730c..04cadc02e5a6 100644 --- a/fs/gfs2/main.c +++ b/fs/gfs2/main.c @@ -111,7 +111,6 @@ static int __init init_gfs2_fs(void) gfs2_inode_cachep =3D kmem_cache_create("gfs2_inode", sizeof(struct gfs2_inode), 0, SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT| - SLAB_MEM_SPREAD| SLAB_ACCOUNT, gfs2_init_inode_once); if (!gfs2_inode_cachep) --=20 2.40.1