From nobody Fri Dec 19 06:31:12 2025 Received: from out-183.mta0.migadu.com (out-183.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6FA541C74 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:48:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.183 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708782501; cv=none; b=aVz4aYuMKaLDjnbl5dhajdL2FyDd3/OA4JwfGnKS0kQscBn+46ASHrfOSu1Tc047NUE7OOcw8w8hG0wXef2w62aUcxK5pThQlb23b7WRO9iAKrXpvQNMUkFCO+1NsoQp+/zbC76n8AP7C7VPekFqTtJcPdaXgZs3wANMtJUF0aE= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708782501; c=relaxed/simple; bh=j6m4PB9nZL+Vs/fyNF5Wkaix8i5kA54i3RrzOAcSgV8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=mFwqREWlYHkVzEJ+HVACFE4JbseqyjYyZ+LWLPvz77/kBzNKA+Ry6+BIwDYUNkPJwP9nzgOULO08IPN20qZYI3cufrwksJ314gQPqePBLnDsVegsRkYH5KSvLHZk3iFcA2bMyH1+kDXLgiL7xY2V1fb9zqpGbnoU/ZYHJxSiNnI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=BI1C8Hva; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.183 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="BI1C8Hva" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1708782496; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gM2elDK8BW00zbxGp1C738caKYJ1uhpdKk71pGsCu7Y=; b=BI1C8HvanvpJ4+pbCCjt7e+Hogey6YRVqmNgbMXsOKbaPCqHFmPRAjd2h1s9AE4Rjt+HpF PKbR2lTX42RIUWEOCquQhHJi2jOlC+GhI3TZQLat66yKDQHaYstiLb/ZNmD+DhhQFkGYXd ZEagBqUmp2uGVzVJUjZb0Qm794cZY48= From: chengming.zhou@linux.dev To: linkinjeon@kernel.org, sj1557.seo@samsung.com Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, vbabka@suse.cz, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, Xiongwei.Song@windriver.com, chengming.zhou@linux.dev, Chengming Zhou Subject: [PATCH] exfat: remove SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag usage Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:48:03 +0000 Message-Id: <20240224134803.829394-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Chengming Zhou The SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag is already a no-op as of 6.8-rc1, remove its usage so we can delete it from slab. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou --- fs/exfat/cache.c | 2 +- fs/exfat/super.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/exfat/cache.c b/fs/exfat/cache.c index 5a2f119b7e8c..7cc200d89821 100644 --- a/fs/exfat/cache.c +++ b/fs/exfat/cache.c @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ int exfat_cache_init(void) { exfat_cachep =3D kmem_cache_create("exfat_cache", sizeof(struct exfat_cache), - 0, SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT|SLAB_MEM_SPREAD, + 0, SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT, exfat_cache_init_once); if (!exfat_cachep) return -ENOMEM; diff --git a/fs/exfat/super.c b/fs/exfat/super.c index d9d4fa91010b..db6a2ebed94b 100644 --- a/fs/exfat/super.c +++ b/fs/exfat/super.c @@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ static int __init init_exfat_fs(void) =20 exfat_inode_cachep =3D kmem_cache_create("exfat_inode_cache", sizeof(struct exfat_inode_info), - 0, SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT | SLAB_MEM_SPREAD, + 0, SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT, exfat_inode_init_once); if (!exfat_inode_cachep) { err =3D -ENOMEM; --=20 2.40.1