From nobody Fri Dec 19 06:18:09 2025 Received: from out-179.mta1.migadu.com (out-179.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93CC329438 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:48:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.179 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708782489; cv=none; b=FxIG074jyApOMjAf2YyMBY8pSkGbLipBSdq/fc7uO83A49kSVGhNQ59oFXVLcVGDGDpMJqgqcd8B+gG7M9rR8ZONye+q5yGu6il2mBe1bmzUa4z6R4kYOG6XiozkCKXGv8Hbfj5dFyWlouCKftVHPpaKEQtnSzI2YCHjS4vzIGc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708782489; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Hf1EvUqSPPrwju7FZe9QROGFi2kgS1A0PvtxOKouvmM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=ZW7h0TT2Bq52gE9izhsekiCBvJtzO2JVohNbc495SNkcwdadPwYZwS8ItzudWzV2B/ghnzthrYxBVvPQFDATzR7k/JbR5cDMDpMFLAYGPxPSI2SrMFVO6835DzXRmZ4siHcW4ZO6UAez7f9TII85+Ex57nXtopRg4dbwX11ucCw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=fl/RWrgg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.179 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="fl/RWrgg" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1708782482; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nhgk1xLGq4KX/ZM1rwfa07VQXn0oX30NwYq/BvwDp04=; b=fl/RWrggsb1lT23NO1RkWdvVun6tHSIULezh29Wj5sdbZDIbimQXihiTJ/TYDYuVSpgTUf xNrVYfDyUsd7UO0ltzy9rp3FfJEsstIkLMGalkZrHm/2aDPm0ANm3586REIj+DtM2NC8vA uNi52abAQJbIiC4SFfiaP+oHFRKV8AA= From: chengming.zhou@linux.dev To: xiang@kernel.org, chao@kernel.org, huyue2@coolpad.com, jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com Cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, vbabka@suse.cz, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, Xiongwei.Song@windriver.com, chengming.zhou@linux.dev, Chengming Zhou Subject: [PATCH] erofs: remove SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag usage Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:47:49 +0000 Message-Id: <20240224134749.829361-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Chengming Zhou The SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag is already a no-op as of 6.8-rc1, remove its usage so we can delete it from slab. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou --- fs/erofs/super.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/erofs/super.c b/fs/erofs/super.c index 9b4b66dcdd4f..8b6bf9ae1a59 100644 --- a/fs/erofs/super.c +++ b/fs/erofs/super.c @@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ static int __init erofs_module_init(void) =20 erofs_inode_cachep =3D kmem_cache_create("erofs_inode", sizeof(struct erofs_inode), 0, - SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT | SLAB_MEM_SPREAD | SLAB_ACCOUNT, + SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT | SLAB_ACCOUNT, erofs_inode_init_once); if (!erofs_inode_cachep) return -ENOMEM; --=20 2.40.1