From nobody Fri Dec 19 02:56:03 2025 Received: from out-170.mta1.migadu.com (out-170.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69580E559 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:46:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.170 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708782400; cv=none; b=Hx/uANSuNm7Ra7qLK+OFSS8BK2EhGS6tir2QxgnvqSUKZmSeu+pS1+GLHPqjeuB2qdmiaYtH9JO656+YTOLxvKuoMydV5JynchsoCidr7I4cCiZx1i/HeHQitGcVKX2GXiaLtSeGaxSSxD7L+YHGf/glK/uqf9aFMj/TEKOdYTM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708782400; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vHVVXs52UZDUDt8d6C6jXJaAUgPqoSuNZEua3elrOig=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=bqmaI00BlqAGSOL34RPzluwMWL7vg0jPeZVbSh5tPnotvibiYDPQXbr3KV7z9IIfxE54cqLZVZ8qwvzs4V6h/YM4X4Of2c/DhaYljRYnRomNwN2ddxxn8TbvGMyKhxd5sk08qc+ZHqNlcXp8GA5aUKhKzUqMY1dnBXgP/MmU6LY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=JwPgOKvU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.170 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="JwPgOKvU" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1708782396; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8N2J1+XCT+l1dZ8LlfhLcKCm1/gv2vTPXUnKvRWB5YY=; b=JwPgOKvUGKJAhHXRa/9jo1bpsVr36Jyvwy8h2k9XM0tB5NgAiYU9511lTjmX1LSAwoiUKC L01E8KlEW8tn5CwXlMGqlZWzKShTeqT6tx4mQsMNbnYtV/nn7UIG+IvXEPi1l1Tv7Qejaj PW+DNx87t8pGWIz5pt0hBSWn0tZVQ6Q= From: chengming.zhou@linux.dev To: zhouchengming@bytedance.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, vbabka@suse.cz, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, Xiongwei.Song@windriver.com, chengming.zhou@linux.dev Subject: [PATCH] adfs: remove SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag usage Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:46:30 +0000 Message-Id: <20240224134630.829042-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Chengming Zhou The SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag is already a no-op as of 6.8-rc1, remove its usage so we can delete it from slab. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou --- fs/adfs/super.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/adfs/super.c b/fs/adfs/super.c index e8bfc38239cd..9354b14bbfe3 100644 --- a/fs/adfs/super.c +++ b/fs/adfs/super.c @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static int __init init_inodecache(void) adfs_inode_cachep =3D kmem_cache_create("adfs_inode_cache", sizeof(struct adfs_inode_info), 0, (SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT| - SLAB_MEM_SPREAD|SLAB_ACCOUNT), + SLAB_ACCOUNT), init_once); if (adfs_inode_cachep =3D=3D NULL) return -ENOMEM; --=20 2.40.1