From nobody Fri Dec 19 04:00:26 2025 Received: from out-173.mta0.migadu.com (out-173.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70419E559 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.173 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708782393; cv=none; b=niyFAZTFVNMcBam/CtuwE8vtOwbnwsvE4w17XxPxRrvA2kIstyJCAuKsGn7m/2PZM2cvHiLQoO9gqoKpDLF5M+i8A7SJ0rQd/4Yy9QwPXZ9aNdSRPWgmHItNtrL42pZcqkDji19Wd470tv068Rm+QQJ8M76jNbOn6bvlKFHryCg= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708782393; c=relaxed/simple; bh=znUWX/WHxO8E1DbbTZpiulV0UzSDhdKmfWMj15MOtIM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=jsdXtSVM4XsBOGGYkUjxxbGZF2U++w5VWgybwlePNTGBU/RY/09Vk31gUBgw5MHYcltDA0qYSru18MgIsCKXlEB/AocrfQdi/3GYEAKAfToPdHGVS0FdWumNm5gHkJXxVQYveJowshsOwaL1BplnouPS7x7jvYTH3/+9HLYTnhM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=M3xfCMXr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="M3xfCMXr" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1708782388; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xPD7kQrj4QVbyIPYEPjgeoIpw5sjNPJYGKf/24Kh9AY=; b=M3xfCMXr476j/PJU5PkafSSrNC1/XpanlWyf+pMtahIvilWPTFF6BiCr0lbtfrBJrgEj1f m2e+Mq6e8ebaxVQVXha97vHCKqAXNy4vFT4RpdpjckByIjdfzAOTOwvF6J1R97+Wt9sxOk aeqiuWKo8wFd/C3/a3AbjwY5hzlHKPk= From: chengming.zhou@linux.dev To: ericvh@kernel.org, lucho@ionkov.net, asmadeus@codewreck.org, linux_oss@crudebyte.com Cc: v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, vbabka@suse.cz, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, Xiongwei.Song@windriver.com, chengming.zhou@linux.dev, Chengming Zhou Subject: [PATCH] 9p: remove SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag usage Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:46:17 +0000 Message-Id: <20240224134617.829016-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Chengming Zhou The SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag is already a no-op as of 6.8-rc1, remove its usage so we can delete it from slab. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou --- fs/9p/v9fs.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/9p/v9fs.c b/fs/9p/v9fs.c index 61dbe52bb3a3..281a1ed03a04 100644 --- a/fs/9p/v9fs.c +++ b/fs/9p/v9fs.c @@ -637,7 +637,7 @@ static int v9fs_init_inode_cache(void) v9fs_inode_cache =3D kmem_cache_create("v9fs_inode_cache", sizeof(struct v9fs_inode), 0, (SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT| - SLAB_MEM_SPREAD|SLAB_ACCOUNT), + SLAB_ACCOUNT), v9fs_inode_init_once); if (!v9fs_inode_cache) return -ENOMEM; --=20 2.40.1