From nobody Fri Dec 19 18:52:29 2025 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39F7911701; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 12:12:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708776754; cv=none; b=VvYOUj1K/zemSFPF7LmFY6QpxjauePXbNMmdmPBUUlQLpQoskc4GhAIAqvxeQCFgqu90okvxWxxmqPtbwrvwX41oo7ooth56H72ieiM2x5zu/TM2HdS74EFRAIa8EHM/7BCGNbvDN+lbWHvIXASvH8ktv7CfV8yA5wg5N0UWdtY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708776754; c=relaxed/simple; bh=W9xsZJD7YcnkkKcjvki79L57zBBOz+m+R5LU7SHYrDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=D08n5cttzVVp0EucHGJ4L5c50B9aTsXg5fOhc+v7uZcbdTV7xjoW16yh3fn3kYIjm9n6efMFJyGwoTxaBirygOjt9FtImFeTZToKMeMG6sfGFlKRH8EPw164D8a0u8CJKlfglCb0ZUDBdzV6U3MArZ10uE7V5YDufgU8TdxaLkw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=qUfeJxt1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="qUfeJxt1" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC6FDC433F1; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 12:12:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1708776753; bh=W9xsZJD7YcnkkKcjvki79L57zBBOz+m+R5LU7SHYrDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=qUfeJxt12Jdebx8coAIJDJOyRJqGwCkqVkxgZNDbQsTJcRxeFkrOZuATpQQGORb7A 7oOfrFj/4H8y0Zzhp2UTT/0QJkERtrkGXEae4cKkp3D6scSOqjtBI8EkurqiPu2bkw Woat3gWsXQ5FjV+k1ROaGfnfSHiKHw63AlAhhAiisZQHFoyVBqAFHNhIfAgAZQ7ZjP YDVdeCO/zrSYZa8X0jdajG/sX05ElV9ajOzY1ScIhHd5S7/+lRRFE1eqkIHMA0j+cE isKJJBLaMTrvwbi8SXIxw2J3agKR/kdICuj/kDWoZcT+0f0DqpXwpWMOR8s5T8b1pU N1Ejmp4etFQ5Q== From: Arnd Bergmann To: Alasdair Kergon , Mike Snitzer , Mikulas Patocka , dm-devel@lists.linux.dev Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Eric Biggers , Yu Zhe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] dm-integrity: reduce stack usage for recheck Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:12:14 +0100 Message-Id: <20240224121228.1904859-1-arnd@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Arnd Bergmann The newly added integrity_recheck() function has another larger stack allocation, just like its caller integrity_metadata(). When it gets inlined, the combination of the two exceeds the warning limit for 32-bit architectures and possibly risks an overflow when this is called from a deep call chain through a file system: drivers/md/dm-integrity.c:1767:13: error: stack frame size (1048) exceeds l= imit (1024) in 'integrity_metadata' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than] 1767 | static void integrity_metadata(struct work_struct *w) Since the caller at this point is done using its checksum buffer, just reuse the same buffer in the new function to avoid the double allocation. Fixes: c88f5e553fe3 ("dm-integrity: recheck the integrity tag after a failu= re") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann --- drivers/md/dm-integrity.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c b/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c index 143f6c223b0e..82023f1f3df0 100644 --- a/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c @@ -1691,14 +1691,13 @@ static void integrity_sector_checksum(struct dm_int= egrity_c *ic, sector_t sector get_random_bytes(result, ic->tag_size); } =20 -static void integrity_recheck(struct dm_integrity_io *dio) +static void integrity_recheck(struct dm_integrity_io *dio, char *checksum) { struct bio *bio =3D dm_bio_from_per_bio_data(dio, sizeof(struct dm_integr= ity_io)); struct dm_integrity_c *ic =3D dio->ic; struct bvec_iter iter; struct bio_vec bv; sector_t sector, logical_sector, area, offset; - char checksum_onstack[max_t(size_t, HASH_MAX_DIGESTSIZE, MAX_TAG_SIZE)]; struct page *page; void *buffer; =20 @@ -1735,8 +1734,8 @@ static void integrity_recheck(struct dm_integrity_io = *dio) } =20 integrity_sector_checksum(ic, logical_sector, buffer, - checksum_onstack); - r =3D dm_integrity_rw_tag(ic, checksum_onstack, &dio->metadata_block, + checksum); + r =3D dm_integrity_rw_tag(ic, checksum, &dio->metadata_block, &dio->metadata_offset, ic->tag_size, TAG_CMP); if (r) { if (r > 0) { @@ -1851,7 +1850,7 @@ static void integrity_metadata(struct work_struct *w) checksums_ptr - checksums, dio->op =3D=3D REQ_OP_READ ? TAG_CMP : TA= G_WRITE); if (unlikely(r)) { if (r > 0) { - integrity_recheck(dio); + integrity_recheck(dio, checksums); goto skip_io; } if (likely(checksums !=3D checksums_onstack)) --=20 2.39.2