From nobody Tue Feb 10 15:28:19 2026 Received: from dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (unknown [45.249.212.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6741817BA5; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 08:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708589035; cv=none; b=drRtQtx6Tx3YQYjG+ApcdQUouHS2pz+HhBmOstaGqWGlvml6IOotImGanmhfGZ2OpNB1qjxU96STSkRamT1akWAksiR0SgIK31VBk4TsNFUZ3YEQbMg0jlxTdr+FXci9am/MrMnRfIxkzYDHzI0EIwqJbDPEABF4NQd2sWmq9xY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708589035; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7kVlrLuEO2gutpZPXDh7f0UW3JTtGoXwSbJoDBPqEpI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=IfRmd7nCKV9vHGANrEm5Vowy2lA/P5FD57FPBACSV+4PeOznh+Z9sJ3IpOPo2exHXZokrD3ua2ag/y5DSYtPjdWq6+bFjjU0sUSnVQ8qj4THPyeVrFB9mfXi/oCrT6m77FT915ZDohsAF2/ahkA7/TG+DDjgNz6l6hhzAT7ZmNY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.216]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TgQdB2pnKz4f3l7J; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 16:03:42 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.112]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6802E1A1051; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 16:03:47 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.104.67]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgBXKBHc_9ZlnaUhEw--.37287S8; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 16:03:47 +0800 (CST) From: Yu Kuai To: paul.e.luse@linux.intel.com, song@kernel.org, neilb@suse.com, shli@fb.com Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yukuai3@huawei.com, yukuai1@huaweicloud.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com Subject: [PATCH md-6.9 04/10] md/raid1-10: add a helper raid1_check_read_range() Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:58:00 +0800 Message-Id: <20240222075806.1816400-5-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240222075806.1816400-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> References: <20240222075806.1816400-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgBXKBHc_9ZlnaUhEw--.37287S8 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7AFy8Zw15tr4rJr43Jw47urg_yoW8KryDpr 4Yya43tr1UK3y3W3W3uF1xCw1FyayfWFW8GrWfX3WDWry5Ga9akFykJryjgFyDWry3Xw12 qa1jvrWxua47CaDanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUPY14x267AKxVWrJVCq3wAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0 rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2048vs2IY020E87I2jVAFwI0_JF0E3s1l82xGYI kIc2x26xkF7I0E14v26ryj6s0DM28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2 z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_tr0E3s1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr1j6F 4UJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oVCq 3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0I7 IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4U M4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JM4x0x7Aq67IIx4CEVc8vx2IErcIFxwACI402YVCY1x02628vn2 kIc2xKxwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E 14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_Jw0_GFylIx kGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAF wI0_Gr0_Cr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r 4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Gr1UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x0JUQSdkU UUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: 51xn3trlr6x35dzhxuhorxvhhfrp/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Yu Kuai The checking and handler of bad blocks appear many timers during read_balance() in raid1 and raid10. This helper will be used in later patches to simplify read_balance() a lot. Co-developed-by: Paul Luse Signed-off-by: Paul Luse Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai Reviewed-by: Xiao Ni --- drivers/md/raid1-10.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1-10.c b/drivers/md/raid1-10.c index 512746551f36..9bc0f0022a6c 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid1-10.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid1-10.c @@ -227,3 +227,52 @@ static inline bool exceed_read_errors(struct mddev *md= dev, struct md_rdev *rdev) =20 return false; } + +/** + * raid1_check_read_range() - check a given read range for bad blocks, + * available read length is returned; + * @rdev: the rdev to read; + * @this_sector: read position; + * @len: read length; + * + * helper function for read_balance() + * + * 1) If there are no bad blocks in the range, @len is returned; + * 2) If the range are all bad blocks, 0 is returned; + * 3) If there are partial bad blocks: + * - If the bad block range starts after @this_sector, the length of first + * good region is returned; + * - If the bad block range starts before @this_sector, 0 is returned and + * the @len is updated to the offset into the region before we get to the + * good blocks; + */ +static inline int raid1_check_read_range(struct md_rdev *rdev, + sector_t this_sector, int *len) +{ + sector_t first_bad; + int bad_sectors; + + /* no bad block overlap */ + if (!is_badblock(rdev, this_sector, *len, &first_bad, &bad_sectors)) + return *len; + + /* + * bad block range starts offset into our range so we can return the + * number of sectors before the bad blocks start. + */ + if (first_bad > this_sector) + return first_bad - this_sector; + + /* read range is fully consumed by bad blocks. */ + if (this_sector + *len <=3D first_bad + bad_sectors) + return 0; + + /* + * final case, bad block range starts before or at the start of our + * range but does not cover our entire range so we still return 0 but + * update the length with the number of sectors before we get to the + * good ones. + */ + *len =3D first_bad + bad_sectors - this_sector; + return 0; +} --=20 2.39.2