From nobody Wed Dec 24 01:49:11 2025 Received: from mail-pj1-f42.google.com (mail-pj1-f42.google.com [209.85.216.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E9B313B7B7 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 19:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.42 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707939969; cv=none; b=J340HHIKPqbVvCdwME6FnKblCmbjpKPxyEfUFFjWHVAy549uc99T7D46wOQ0Mv5j2oPSAEHQIRHw753OccIsLYz6g4hBJjLwyJWZK9nN1vHhV3YW2rTJf8Ino5na9T48IqVq++idH4iJ91W6grxDUbVyKyC4vkBJo8jyCQ5lT0w= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707939969; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XRea/mEhcbAGWa9Y4NibhO2kDjISXokmQWKcnCxCkCA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=dzEscKXKxESlYY94P9fIsDrTVmROHFcHC0Tz7Ttzw/vQ066mC1Y/PIj7lyp266mwz/+kvGlRtBjrrvuzEFgGYs2VRZBD7LZ4n6bVCMXPnZh5SRkoOsQ8kIalkdd2lg129zXhlqrSH8PZ8YVlGg1HfXRpbv6TcSr0YpWtx03gZlw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b=j6pGp4mA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.42 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="j6pGp4mA" Received: by mail-pj1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-296d26db6aaso129765a91.1 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 11:46:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; t=1707939966; x=1708544766; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=jM19jkSsuav/2hSBnxgTz0qK403f31xS1I7deDtmjCo=; b=j6pGp4mAUI8QjQU/ezhM62Tcu7UvHyi3oVNUWkdR1h1/8YEbn9srwSIL7qHO8jCQHk LNcRvT/e+eUkd1XwOn2fHBC9WsF8019aXjeJmHOEpSrD+KVvKJkYgcVPB0qPU5LpMiZX fj8WyNv7kDxP/jAQqrWLG2EDqZQCinqTJLp/g= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1707939966; x=1708544766; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jM19jkSsuav/2hSBnxgTz0qK403f31xS1I7deDtmjCo=; b=mhF2WPF6KR6pPeAMO4cXHmYyM1oPe3Lu7KxIBLTSepM58bsYuve9x7pxIYsw1iL0Gl lgr2SBVPJrKf7QUH5PLq/T7J+/T6mTbbwaC7AqFjzicAilv6OzmvjNbo6uEM7LKslZuM r/mgQ8iSe+bl3ACiuM9bx467KnX9Xkl+Yuj4FH0NAmv03C+hMZXbOCC4yBBVzANmavdh bBtCwNyfMIdbwBULHVD2TXC62/TfPnwdj/ru+SzU2iwHFkKHgEvUYbHIWUzl3JlkXdOF DJ6PHriWTND/fNIt/YXGYWlcMcVQwFMlIqsIv/dIVlTdeRhXXsKbiXaXdod4HnpSxapF loFQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVfE7kLMm0l1CN1SJc2IQPPrK61ARc6hQAA4Cct8U6sT+JrssrBSjKIyrBWz5EdCviRtszntWxFLF/nhsXn7Noo5h0iUG1a15W+ioN9 X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwWB26VbpcXgkkP7bHeS/0wyWfMNJ3Y4L7gUlF05KLA9KB+ftFy JHvrwSWYeYeT6MwrdFG1JAPwZe8J8W/fNkJDNkLk7z23ZVGz68rd5nAZj2wc/w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG1BEnCT0dNA4a8fVl3B4GlNEFYN3BUqCrJsR1LiFYg1x0FRbzeVM1jPRNPwcIOIv8T1wUjjw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:ad09:b0:298:ca21:45e8 with SMTP id r9-20020a17090aad0900b00298ca2145e8mr3554808pjq.7.1707939966688; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 11:46:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from www.outflux.net ([198.0.35.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 9-20020a17090a08c900b002966a13f2e9sm1794443pjn.37.2024.02.14.11.46.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 14 Feb 2024 11:46:05 -0800 (PST) From: Kees Cook To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Kees Cook , "Gustavo A . R . Silva" , Mark Rutland , linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, Rasmus Villemoes , Marco Elver , Eric Biggers , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v7 1/3] overflow: Adjust check_*_overflow() kern-doc to reflect results Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 11:46:01 -0800 Message-Id: <20240214194605.602505-1-keescook@chromium.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240214194432.makes.837-kees@kernel.org> References: <20240214194432.makes.837-kees@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=2828; i=keescook@chromium.org; h=from:subject; bh=XRea/mEhcbAGWa9Y4NibhO2kDjISXokmQWKcnCxCkCA=; b=owEBbQKS/ZANAwAKAYly9N/cbcAmAcsmYgBlzRh7r+ya4r7uEt9x8g08cu6WVWLE7l1GWFkDZ 9tMyyEzBZiJAjMEAAEKAB0WIQSlw/aPIp3WD3I+bhOJcvTf3G3AJgUCZc0YewAKCRCJcvTf3G3A JokeD/4syUq1+l4y9hFWnYnriJZrkny078pHVb3PIOY5XYIudZ7ZTv5wuMAwVzHjGujXsmINAAO pvn3kJa2F6Fu75yGUOsdFeG+YwFY6VARtUIQDEgUtoGl9ulfw/jzOViuCCPRtZ8VE+6yAsrz34V cI4G7wA8IuprJ7z7dYaOGt6npq+U390i9v9w19QuSX6Q61KrNl2Oj4Sd8WAuCWs6xnUj2fGa9fy No3EaO924o3xaALxo8oKz8difZ+2TlvzxarU3j+wXtuwKLtE8xtUYcJRQoRYcWtZPH189hLRZZ/ OSs3HhcGiJyzihAAVr7oRL9Q323ECK+cbgVhHgVUNE1qrQbI8kEbKqWmqqdaEeLO1CjQVfeCbwN tlSPBwgtAkSvDTFssmMwHj+PI2dg8R6nNULk/ZYzsgBjABA/VYd6gNSmGE71Clc7t6OoJ1716iR ccUkN/TTWttr2MhLMa9f5sEsqFKd49BxDylTAqgO6NvD7qAbqb8V69oJ22k9+67QhFLnxAKNNxp kAsCJkher0VmBPGWFR7dK9KbrTYa5hPVrdKrjzTOphv+FKiWzPs5+dS4UfNQF0Ani7da/rQsisj LgY3RieGWc9W3kAP7vFeEf9JkLj7p2aAp9dVUDMObMj5wbTzD6+sK3QbS5kqou0OuVJTG3LO+6T H3GIukbfitb4mnA== X-Developer-Key: i=keescook@chromium.org; a=openpgp; fpr=A5C3F68F229DD60F723E6E138972F4DFDC6DC026 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The check_*_overflow() helpers will return results with potentially wrapped-around values. These values have always been checked by the selftests, so avoid the confusing language in the kern-doc. The idea of "safe for use" was relative to the expectation of whether or not the caller wants a wrapped value -- the calculation itself will always follow arithmetic wrapping rules. Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Acked-by: Mark Rutland --- Cc: Mark Rutland Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org --- include/linux/overflow.h | 21 +++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/overflow.h b/include/linux/overflow.h index 7b5cf4a5cd19..ad64d810c8aa 100644 --- a/include/linux/overflow.h +++ b/include/linux/overflow.h @@ -57,11 +57,10 @@ static inline bool __must_check __must_check_overflow(b= ool overflow) * @b: second addend * @d: pointer to store sum * - * Returns 0 on success. + * Returns true on wrap-around, false otherwise. * - * *@d holds the results of the attempted addition, but is not considered - * "safe for use" on a non-zero return value, which indicates that the - * sum has overflowed or been truncated. + * *@d holds the results of the attempted addition, regardless of whether + * wrap-around occurred. */ #define check_add_overflow(a, b, d) \ __must_check_overflow(__builtin_add_overflow(a, b, d)) @@ -72,11 +71,10 @@ static inline bool __must_check __must_check_overflow(b= ool overflow) * @b: subtrahend; value to subtract from @a * @d: pointer to store difference * - * Returns 0 on success. + * Returns true on wrap-around, false otherwise. * - * *@d holds the results of the attempted subtraction, but is not consider= ed - * "safe for use" on a non-zero return value, which indicates that the - * difference has underflowed or been truncated. + * *@d holds the results of the attempted subtraction, regardless of wheth= er + * wrap-around occurred. */ #define check_sub_overflow(a, b, d) \ __must_check_overflow(__builtin_sub_overflow(a, b, d)) @@ -87,11 +85,10 @@ static inline bool __must_check __must_check_overflow(b= ool overflow) * @b: second factor * @d: pointer to store product * - * Returns 0 on success. + * Returns true on wrap-around, false otherwise. * - * *@d holds the results of the attempted multiplication, but is not - * considered "safe for use" on a non-zero return value, which indicates - * that the product has overflowed or been truncated. + * *@d holds the results of the attempted multiplication, regardless of wh= ether + * wrap-around occurred. */ #define check_mul_overflow(a, b, d) \ __must_check_overflow(__builtin_mul_overflow(a, b, d)) --=20 2.34.1