From nobody Tue Dec 23 20:07:48 2025 Received: from out30-112.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-112.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD84112C54F for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.112 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706721476; cv=none; b=C33Zzh8UAOTn07oVaJHxr6XiBEeEUF94vVOaIer8TdnSUQf6cBIah0Q6/jV1OPUSBwlU+k2/5p9VGaWo0tHdRFggYbVZGRdw3VY9JXo0M8CRH50Af9sxh58/ZKzH2t/k3bBXtYi5IuPWUYlXeDh5t2UTKCvoCaulLmy05ZiXlt0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706721476; c=relaxed/simple; bh=j8l9XSrCMY/1IIxTqf6hdLRHkve3xMP1HTEkYgXeYNg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AGJJNcMnC9aSCYUBHl0DQv6XH4tRUuYrm4F+i2QfAk6YlmVP3i/JEo+aqxb53631g/SD4zgODrCHTx7VsUWG690sVjlSBsRGIR6BqOVqoEod+rvrGntZsu8GNPL2Xz4inXNYsw8zUGTrly4imHdytzzgCoVNVZ3LFmJof8+hMFQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=PxfWgRyn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.112 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="PxfWgRyn" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1706721466; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=hPVe22NkRbyXcn0gpdzROaquleTwTL6gBnFaS965ewQ=; b=PxfWgRynTDO5RyqzMOUTMxxUj2YwvwocdxWT3N6u7AYp2ffAeTdnVb4X3VygKx5xz0w+hUkb39v1keD3tn1a0sD8XBlv8wzSFkdX44R4NdCeGdg2382rBusk+GH+MJ5n/HXhbvOq4Rn40oQEjz6DMZHQi1HGYMAGOyk9tiI1ykk= X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R281e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018046059;MF=yaoma@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=7;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0W.kJfUc_1706721464; Received: from localhost.localdomain(mailfrom:yaoma@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0W.kJfUc_1706721464) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 01:17:46 +0800 From: Bitao Hu To: dianders@chromium.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, pmladek@suse.com, kernelfans@gmail.com, liusong@linux.alibaba.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yaoma@linux.alibaba.com Subject: [PATCHv3 1/2] watchdog/softlockup: low-overhead detection of interrupt storm Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 01:17:37 +0800 Message-Id: <20240131171738.35496-2-yaoma@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.1 (Apple Git-137.1) In-Reply-To: <20240131171738.35496-1-yaoma@linux.alibaba.com> References: <20240131171738.35496-1-yaoma@linux.alibaba.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The following softlockup is caused by interrupt storm, but it cannot be identified from the call tree. Because the call tree is just a snapshot and doesn't fully capture the behavior of the CPU during the soft lockup. watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#28 stuck for 23s! [fio:83921] ... Call trace: __do_softirq+0xa0/0x37c __irq_exit_rcu+0x108/0x140 irq_exit+0x14/0x20 __handle_domain_irq+0x84/0xe0 gic_handle_irq+0x80/0x108 el0_irq_naked+0x50/0x58 Therefore=EF=BC=8CI think it is necessary to report CPU utilization during = the softlockup_thresh period (report once every sample_period, for a total of 5 reportings), like this: watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#28 stuck for 23s! [fio:83921] CPU#28 Utilization every 4s during lockup: #1: 0% system, 0% softirq, 100% hardirq, 0% idle #2: 0% system, 0% softirq, 100% hardirq, 0% idle #3: 0% system, 0% softirq, 100% hardirq, 0% idle #4: 0% system, 0% softirq, 100% hardirq, 0% idle #5: 0% system, 0% softirq, 100% hardirq, 0% idle ... This would be helpful in determining whether an interrupt storm has occurred or in identifying the cause of the softlockup. The criteria for determination are as follows: a. If the hardirq utilization is high, then interrupt storm should be considered and the root cause cannot be determined from the call tree. b. If the softirq utilization is high, then we could analyze the call tree but it may cannot reflect the root cause. c. If the system utilization is high, then we could analyze the root cause from the call tree. Signed-off-by: Bitao Hu --- kernel/watchdog.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c index 81a8862295d6..046507be4eb5 100644 --- a/kernel/watchdog.c +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ #include #include #include +#include +#include =20 #include #include @@ -441,6 +443,85 @@ static int is_softlockup(unsigned long touch_ts, return 0; } =20 +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING +#define NUM_STATS_GROUPS 5 +enum stats_per_group { + STATS_SYSTEM, + STATS_SOFTIRQ, + STATS_HARDIRQ, + STATS_IDLE, + NUM_STATS_PER_GROUP, +}; +static enum cpu_usage_stat stats[NUM_STATS_PER_GROUP] =3D { + CPUTIME_SYSTEM, + CPUTIME_SOFTIRQ, + CPUTIME_IRQ, + CPUTIME_IDLE, +}; +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u16, cpustat_old[NUM_STATS_PER_GROUP]); +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u8, cpustat_utilization[NUM_STATS_GROUPS][NUM_STATS_= PER_GROUP]); +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u8, cpustat_tail); + +/* + * We don't need nanosecond resolution. A granularity of 16ms is + * sufficient for our precision, allowing us to use u16 to store + * cpustats, which will roll over roughly every ~1000 seconds. + * 2^24 ~=3D 16 * 10^6 + */ +static u16 get_16bit_precision(u64 data) +{ + return data >> 24LL; /* 2^24ns ~=3D 16.8ms */ +} + +static void update_cpustat(void) +{ + u8 i; + u16 old; + u8 utilization; + u8 tail =3D __this_cpu_read(cpustat_tail); + struct kernel_cpustat kcpustat; + u64 *cpustat =3D kcpustat.cpustat; + u16 sample_period_ms =3D get_16bit_precision(sample_period); + + kcpustat_cpu_fetch(&kcpustat, smp_processor_id()); + for (i =3D STATS_SYSTEM; i < NUM_STATS_PER_GROUP; i++) { + old =3D __this_cpu_read(cpustat_old[i]); + cpustat[stats[i]] =3D get_16bit_precision(cpustat[stats[i]]); + utilization =3D 100 * (u16)(cpustat[stats[i]] - old) / sample_period_ms; + __this_cpu_write(cpustat_utilization[tail][i], utilization); + __this_cpu_write(cpustat_old[i], cpustat[stats[i]]); + } + __this_cpu_write(cpustat_tail, (tail + 1) % NUM_STATS_GROUPS); +} + +static void print_cpustat(void) +{ + u8 i, j; + u8 tail =3D __this_cpu_read(cpustat_tail); + u64 sample_period_second =3D sample_period; + + do_div(sample_period_second, NSEC_PER_SEC); + /* + * We do not want the "watchdog: " prefix on every line, + * hence we use "printk" instead of "pr_crit". + */ + printk(KERN_CRIT "CPU#%d Utilization every %llus during lockup:\n", + smp_processor_id(), sample_period_second); + for (j =3D STATS_SYSTEM, i =3D tail; j < NUM_STATS_GROUPS; + j++, i =3D (i + 1) % NUM_STATS_GROUPS) { + printk(KERN_CRIT "\t#%d: %3u%% system,\t%3u%% softirq,\t" + "%3u%% hardirq,\t%3u%% idle\n", j+1, + __this_cpu_read(cpustat_utilization[i][STATS_SYSTEM]), + __this_cpu_read(cpustat_utilization[i][STATS_SOFTIRQ]), + __this_cpu_read(cpustat_utilization[i][STATS_HARDIRQ]), + __this_cpu_read(cpustat_utilization[i][STATS_IDLE])); + } +} +#else +static inline void update_cpustat(void) { } +static inline void print_cpustat(void) { } +#endif + /* watchdog detector functions */ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct completion, softlockup_completion); static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_stop_work, softlockup_stop_work); @@ -504,6 +585,8 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart watchdog_timer_fn(struct hr= timer *hrtimer) */ period_ts =3D READ_ONCE(*this_cpu_ptr(&watchdog_report_ts)); =20 + update_cpustat(); + /* Reset the interval when touched by known problematic code. */ if (period_ts =3D=3D SOFTLOCKUP_DELAY_REPORT) { if (unlikely(__this_cpu_read(softlockup_touch_sync))) { @@ -539,6 +622,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart watchdog_timer_fn(struct hr= timer *hrtimer) pr_emerg("BUG: soft lockup - CPU#%d stuck for %us! [%s:%d]\n", smp_processor_id(), duration, current->comm, task_pid_nr(current)); + print_cpustat(); print_modules(); print_irqtrace_events(current); if (regs) --=20 2.37.1 (Apple Git-137.1)