From nobody Wed Dec 24 18:00:42 2025 Received: from mail-oi1-f171.google.com (mail-oi1-f171.google.com [209.85.167.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5C4A1BC57 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 06:30:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.167.171 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706164210; cv=none; b=Ai8yA2d8QWGFwiv3Sv2SLOfwCPsXH2VsbTauZsRAXVdt+J6w2HqjxgMjoX3qyBta287nqCJBqA8h0qj21hHMTt1pEnpSGJrfo/VWT31HNHsiMCHGgjaTqsqPp8EikXxscTIrhgli2LRUhQVBIBxdL24OvNOrqTDrzQYrHKtQCPY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706164210; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QB+xix8grv8j+GIQeAACDRjClrRowUHsxYLHjUa1Xas=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=Y7sOwf19SUMRtA4P1+n+51Qs9fawlqObce4Ea+776+aRoTsjn3eIE7k4TaOjPnQT6G1fO98/VwuZu0C1R2ThIRQh6oUfnJk/oKDyGN+AojiOEC37FlCNyLyhtJrHpmIzO+VhPZRSyal7MsR0yKquV9js30Gwlf9AIc9VWHVUIQY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=UUbZ7Tum; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.167.171 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="UUbZ7Tum" Received: by mail-oi1-f171.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3bda741ad7dso4930592b6e.1 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:30:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1706164207; x=1706769007; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=uRwHXwAm0bShEXUK35E9/V7WUW2K3zxNpdrnhUWhVek=; b=UUbZ7TumEE3Xgov2AB+3sH3AUZ5U2tsVVDUhng4sg+MAWDV8vbgqkMII5yhK0QIDap KDebZDSduO87SF0FkgdujYmBM8Gn+KRuzQK62TI5Wycd+V2SuFFbY6+ot04uDQgsh6mm tt4NfB5oVeEe52HDOvI/oyxL/32zgZBNNNhn7oGzhgHB1nPv2UT5vA6AApy3870G/nKr NBN0usEqa0rkROlh+RATUmhwvPfaHAfAMN/zh5rhaqfJX7fXOjsWEeSBHtJMHK/FhLFy pKjvqoHWMjbAhVyc0yZquFL4R6761+ENtmOKpkZrlZUhfaiIUpTbLyCK6M2Z5gDrbkNn NSyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706164207; x=1706769007; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uRwHXwAm0bShEXUK35E9/V7WUW2K3zxNpdrnhUWhVek=; b=YWa/mxnhw+fg91sAlaukoUONvnwZe1Q8GvbO/b/gdjh/4PgmpSMqZNUYde5QKvlocg CQ4AaTLP+UXSB5MvKFTqUvvGCtMvCPZdrmo53hcDf2FqkVEobvrjOwxUOfrcmqh680a0 IICl9P6We+yHNz0RO5gFanvYL8uXep6PDpMEIJkkXvSZroKvBzp0yN51yKDuOW720FYI PUFjp4QumOj5kjOz32hIah85rnie0IaefdO1g70v52SSiYkTjxjNQaZkRI2et4AcQwaP wRJaXS0+j/sy3D/D1kG/t1qSEJfW6oUOJeexFSshPKNDh3VEj6eytfBBE1UTQpCXks2V +rBQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxlB87oGBZ/2O+Um7djWa5z7H580UZ4nUfouIqboqvJJ2/y7pSz PaKUbBj6R+eD89uerkbFNvYOlskPQV6K8z11gIIND9zGr2vfMQwpPpzT/5Da2js= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF2nRVvpyMXEbPJKSQolKqo6YC/sGsNRR3PtemnrQHSXb7Izvts4H7oiEK6bWKQLfrB7po8uA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:3990:b0:3bc:7171:b7c7 with SMTP id gq16-20020a056808399000b003bc7171b7c7mr569515oib.67.1706164206921; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:30:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from debug.ba.rivosinc.com ([64.71.180.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t19-20020a056a00139300b006dd870b51b8sm3201139pfg.126.2024.01.24.22.30.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:30:06 -0800 (PST) From: debug@rivosinc.com To: rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, broonie@kernel.org, Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com, kito.cheng@sifive.com, keescook@chromium.org, ajones@ventanamicro.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, conor.dooley@microchip.com, cleger@rivosinc.com, atishp@atishpatra.org, alex@ghiti.fr, bjorn@rivosinc.com, alexghiti@rivosinc.com Cc: corbet@lwn.net, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, oleg@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, ebiederm@xmission.com, shuah@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org, debug@rivosinc.com, guoren@kernel.org, samitolvanen@google.com, evan@rivosinc.com, xiao.w.wang@intel.com, apatel@ventanamicro.com, mchitale@ventanamicro.com, waylingii@gmail.com, greentime.hu@sifive.com, heiko@sntech.de, jszhang@kernel.org, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com, david@redhat.com, charlie@rivosinc.com, panqinglin2020@iscas.ac.cn, willy@infradead.org, vincent.chen@sifive.com, andy.chiu@sifive.com, gerg@kernel.org, jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com, mason.huo@starfivetech.com, ancientmodern4@gmail.com, mathis.salmen@matsal.de, cuiyunhui@bytedance.com, bhe@redhat.com, chenjiahao16@huawei.com, ruscur@russell.cc, bgray@linux.ibm.com, alx@kernel.org, baruch@tkos.co.il, zhangqing@loongson.cn, catalin.marinas@arm.com, revest@chromium.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, joey.gouly@arm.com, shr@devkernel.io, omosnace@redhat.com, ojeda@kernel.org, jhubbard@nvidia.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 19/28] riscv: Implements arch agnostic shadow stack prctls Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:21:44 -0800 Message-ID: <20240125062739.1339782-20-debug@rivosinc.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20240125062739.1339782-1-debug@rivosinc.com> References: <20240125062739.1339782-1-debug@rivosinc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Deepak Gupta Implement architecture agnostic prctls() interface for setting and getting shadow stack status. prctls implemented are PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STAT= US and PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS. As part of PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS/PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, only PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE is implemented because RISCV allows each mode to wri= te to their own shadow stack using `sspush` or `ssamoswap`. PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS locks current configuration of shadow stack ena= bling Following is not supported "Enable shadow stack, then disable and enable again." It's not sure whether providing such semantics are useful. It's better to r= eturn error code when such situation arises. Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta --- arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h | 12 +++- arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/user= cfi.h index eb9a0905e72b..72bcfa773752 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ =20 #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ #include +#include =20 struct task_struct; struct kernel_clone_args; @@ -14,7 +15,8 @@ struct kernel_clone_args; #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI struct cfi_status { unsigned long ubcfi_en : 1; /* Enable for backward cfi. */ - unsigned long rsvd : ((sizeof(unsigned long)*8) - 1); + unsigned long ubcfi_locked : 1; + unsigned long rsvd : ((sizeof(unsigned long)*8) - 2); unsigned long user_shdw_stk; /* Current user shadow stack pointer */ unsigned long shdw_stk_base; /* Base address of shadow stack */ unsigned long shdw_stk_size; /* size of shadow stack */ @@ -26,6 +28,9 @@ void shstk_release(struct task_struct *tsk); void set_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr, un= signed long size); void set_active_shstk(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr); bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task); +bool is_shstk_locked(struct task_struct *task); + +#define PR_SHADOW_STACK_SUPPORTED_STATUS_MASK (PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE) =20 #else =20 @@ -56,6 +61,11 @@ static inline bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *= task) return false; } =20 +static inline bool is_shstk_locked(struct task_struct *task) +{ + return false; +} + #endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI */ =20 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c index 36cac0d653f5..be3a071272d8 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c @@ -24,6 +24,16 @@ bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task) return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_en ? true : false; } =20 +bool is_shstk_allocated(struct task_struct *task) +{ + return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.shdw_stk_base ? true : false; +} + +bool is_shstk_locked(struct task_struct *task) +{ + return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_locked ? true : false; +} + void set_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr, un= signed long size) { task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.shdw_stk_base =3D shstk_addr; @@ -42,6 +52,21 @@ void set_active_shstk(struct task_struct *task, unsigned= long shstk_addr) task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.user_shdw_stk =3D shstk_addr; } =20 +void set_shstk_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable) +{ + task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_en =3D enable ? 1 : 0; + + if (enable) + task->thread_info.envcfg |=3D ENVCFG_SSE; + else + task->thread_info.envcfg &=3D ~ENVCFG_SSE; +} + +void set_shstk_lock(struct task_struct *task) +{ + task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_locked =3D 1; +} + /* * If size is 0, then to be compatible with regular stack we want it to be= as big as * regular stack. Else PAGE_ALIGN it and return back @@ -269,3 +294,83 @@ void shstk_release(struct task_struct *tsk) vm_munmap(base, size); set_shstk_base(tsk, 0, 0); } + +int arch_get_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long __us= er *status) +{ + unsigned long bcfi_status =3D 0; + + if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack()) + return -EINVAL; + + /* this means shadow stack is enabled on the task */ + bcfi_status |=3D (is_shstk_enabled(t) ? PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE : 0); + + return copy_to_user(status, &bcfi_status, sizeof(bcfi_status)) ? -EFAULT = : 0; +} + +int arch_set_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long stat= us) +{ + unsigned long size =3D 0, addr =3D 0; + bool enable_shstk =3D false; + + if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack()) + return -EINVAL; + + /* Reject unknown flags */ + if (status & ~PR_SHADOW_STACK_SUPPORTED_STATUS_MASK) + return -EINVAL; + + /* bcfi status is locked and further can't be modified by user */ + if (is_shstk_locked(t)) + return -EINVAL; + + enable_shstk =3D status & PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE; + /* Request is to enable shadow stack and shadow stack is not enabled alre= ady */ + if (enable_shstk && !is_shstk_enabled(t)) { + /* shadow stack was allocated and enable request again + * no need to support such usecase and return EINVAL. + */ + if (is_shstk_allocated(t)) + return -EINVAL; + + size =3D calc_shstk_size(0); + addr =3D allocate_shadow_stack(0, size, 0, false); + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr)) + return -ENOMEM; + set_shstk_base(t, addr, size); + set_active_shstk(t, addr + size); + } + + /* + * If a request to disable shadow stack happens, let's go ahead and relea= se it + * Although, if CLONE_VFORKed child did this, then in that case we will e= nd up + * not releasing the shadow stack (because it might be needed in parent).= Although + * we will disable it for VFORKed child. And if VFORKed child tries to en= able again + * then in that case, it'll get entirely new shadow stack because followi= ng condition + * are true + * - shadow stack was not enabled for vforked child + * - shadow stack base was anyways pointing to 0 + * This shouldn't be a big issue because we want parent to have availabil= ity of shadow + * stack whenever VFORKed child releases resources via exit or exec but a= t the same + * time we want VFORKed child to break away and establish new shadow stac= k if it desires + * + */ + if (!enable_shstk) + shstk_release(t); + + set_shstk_status(t, enable_shstk); + return 0; +} + +int arch_lock_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *task, + unsigned long arg) +{ + /* If shtstk not supported or not enabled on task, nothing to lock here */ + if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack() || + !is_shstk_enabled(task)) + return -EINVAL; + + set_shstk_lock(task); + + return 0; +} --=20 2.43.0