From nobody Sat Feb 7 23:48:23 2026 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987BEEB64D8 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 21:06:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239197AbjFMVGm (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2023 17:06:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56522 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230189AbjFMVGk (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2023 17:06:40 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F0C11BC6 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 14:05:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1686690349; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Q8vXi7FRx1nxarI+Y7DTeE0H1U4V8kGwZTSHdSqOeZA=; b=c87WA9RdRXiO8CUsG+EHs6mP/fYFOJpbIu5zCdMLOKH27EkLtyQB6J4CSnR1dCnTdWqlDw qcIZ86yn2ym8km1dz/q+oIXV8bTO3HQkRdP1Nq/2Y+CPa2+z84+/mevB7IkzM7anxUBT/x ZTYWexquWN+ZBX6vYb58J+A98C3sWTU= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-623-VC_dhVwxOtqGJSkZWfg4nQ-1; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 17:05:46 -0400 X-MC-Unique: VC_dhVwxOtqGJSkZWfg4nQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33E9180120A; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 21:05:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from emerald.lyude.net (unknown [10.22.8.126]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D6F40C6F5C; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 21:05:37 +0000 (UTC) From: Lyude Paul To: nouveau-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Ben Skeggs , Karol Herbst , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Jani Nikula , Dave Airlie , nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org (open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) Subject: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Fix drm_dp_remove_payload() invocation Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 17:05:28 -0400 Message-Id: <20230613210529.552098-1-lyude@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.2 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" We changed the semantics for this in: e761cc20946a ("drm/display/dp_mst: Handle old/new payload states in drm_dp_= remove_payload()") But I totally forgot to update this properly in nouveau. So, let's do that. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul Reviewed-by: Karol Herbst --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouv= eau/dispnv50/disp.c index 5bb777ff13130..1637e08b548c2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c @@ -909,15 +909,19 @@ nv50_msto_prepare(struct drm_atomic_state *state, struct nouveau_drm *drm =3D nouveau_drm(msto->encoder.dev); struct nv50_mstc *mstc =3D msto->mstc; struct nv50_mstm *mstm =3D mstc->mstm; - struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload; + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *old_mst_state; + struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload, *old_payload; =20 NV_ATOMIC(drm, "%s: msto prepare\n", msto->encoder.name); =20 + old_mst_state =3D drm_atomic_get_old_mst_topology_state(state, mgr); + payload =3D drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(mst_state, mstc->port); + old_payload =3D drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(old_mst_state, mstc->por= t); =20 // TODO: Figure out if we want to do a better job of handling VCPI alloca= tion failures here? if (msto->disabled) { - drm_dp_remove_payload(mgr, mst_state, payload, payload); + drm_dp_remove_payload(mgr, mst_state, old_payload, payload); =20 nvif_outp_dp_mst_vcpi(&mstm->outp->outp, msto->head->base.index, 0, 0, 0= , 0); } else { --=20 2.40.1