From nobody Wed Sep 17 17:44:23 2025 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA40DC4167B for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2022 01:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230063AbiLQBz7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2022 20:55:59 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33870 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229469AbiLQBzt (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2022 20:55:49 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 173254A5BF for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 17:55:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1671242110; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uJATgAbP8LGsegtuj/VmrUG/8tlhpffFE1cUvqDdgpk=; b=MmnW7Xk/nTVo0Fc1nhrCT2hiziSkK77wmQKNjfKBgCV4cw3vbMoDI4rSR2vYkEPrBxV1Z2 IGiqMEOifE5njBv3BIMbmBjFMnKIgBXDIAvlZ8Gl7fCY+QahBL58f6OLhqR+vUGQTEjQUu NwTfUcWw7rBSbYu2vmt/A1p2PURRqD0= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-561-qDVspNCuOqqB61dUmUcbRA-1; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 20:55:06 -0500 X-MC-Unique: qDVspNCuOqqB61dUmUcbRA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C50B101A55E; Sat, 17 Dec 2022 01:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from MiWiFi-R3L-srv.redhat.com (ovpn-12-34.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.34]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE9549BB6A; Sat, 17 Dec 2022 01:54:57 +0000 (UTC) From: Baoquan He To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, urezki@gmail.com, stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com, willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hch@infradead.org, Baoquan He Subject: [PATCH v2 4/7] mm/vmalloc: explicitly identify vm_map_ram area when shown in /proc/vmcoreinfo Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2022 09:54:32 +0800 Message-Id: <20221217015435.73889-5-bhe@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20221217015435.73889-1-bhe@redhat.com> References: <20221217015435.73889-1-bhe@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.10 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Now, by marking VMAP_RAM in vmap_area->flags for vm_map_ram, we can clearly differentiate it with other vmalloc areas. So identify vm_map_area area by checking VMAP_RAM of vmap_area->flags when shown in /proc/vmcoreinfo. Meanwhile, the code comment above vm_map_ram area checking in s_show() is not needed any more, remove it here. Signed-off-by: Baoquan He --- mm/vmalloc.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c index 6612914459cf..3bfa872a4513 100644 --- a/mm/vmalloc.c +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c @@ -4182,11 +4182,7 @@ static int s_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p) =20 va =3D list_entry(p, struct vmap_area, list); =20 - /* - * s_show can encounter race with remove_vm_area, !vm on behalf - * of vmap area is being tear down or vm_map_ram allocation. - */ - if (!va->vm) { + if (!va->vm && (va->flags & VMAP_RAM)) { seq_printf(m, "0x%pK-0x%pK %7ld vm_map_ram\n", (void *)va->va_start, (void *)va->va_end, va->va_end - va->va_start); --=20 2.34.1