From nobody Tue Apr 7 22:00:59 2026 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FAD8C433FE for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 14:21:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231886AbiKDOVo (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2022 10:21:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34814 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232060AbiKDOUo (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2022 10:20:44 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A98D24F2D; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 07:20:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 2A4Dx14F000805; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 14:20:16 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=O4kbJCo545JNCCzGRfFDf8COPGbqLJhpugw/67u4xHU=; b=TqQDT2b0agFaw/q3w6DfVrWu8zVAbfUhE2YEAKwE9SlPaF3OWUF2rhuG9K5/0Tb4LO5u RzMM2LCifliQQi+nmRj8MJqwhIIfuO9df4pkwyrQzyUTz1cHGe52jB1cNR3O3KBASU4X Jz1eYwA0vswwy5r9+Ag0rphqA7IBsCH8L6Yk7+zDuLwqzpbsjnZ00ypmrzpauisHn913 cwSGWogYl/JbfIT0qz484RM5oiaVn3GKdbKNFquE/Lw+hw957kiJp1PodYEQDvbtjDEi 3twxvuVhBqwdwc4G0Y4Wyohi+RGNkIM/UsSgxEM3bnOF1LD621AAOcfKNZ6/qUOVc8Vk qA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3kn2464yw4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 04 Nov 2022 14:20:16 +0000 Received: from m0098399.ppops.net (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 2A4C6Vv0020354; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 14:20:15 GMT Received: from ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (66.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.102]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3kn2464yu9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 04 Nov 2022 14:20:15 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 2A4E5Z5k020074; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 14:20:13 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3kguej2gtm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 04 Nov 2022 14:20:12 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 2A4EK9Lb6226548 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 4 Nov 2022 14:20:09 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 852644C046; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 14:20:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8394C040; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 14:20:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.85.9]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 14:20:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (Postfix, from userid 4958) id D3E91E1F99; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 15:20:08 +0100 (CET) From: Eric Farman To: Matthew Rosato , Alex Williamson , Cornelia Huck , Jason Gunthorpe , Kevin Tian , Yi Liu Cc: Zhenyu Wang , Zhi Wang , Jani Nikula , Joonas Lahtinen , Rodrigo Vivi , Tvrtko Ursulin , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Halil Pasic , Vineeth Vijayan , Peter Oberparleiter , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Alexander Gordeev , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle , Tony Krowiak , Jason Herne , Harald Freudenberger , Diana Craciun , Eric Auger , Kirti Wankhede , Abhishek Sahu , Yishai Hadas , intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Eric Farman Subject: [PATCH v3 5/7] vfio/ccw: remove release completion Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 15:20:05 +0100 Message-Id: <20221104142007.1314999-6-farman@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20221104142007.1314999-1-farman@linux.ibm.com> References: <20221104142007.1314999-1-farman@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: UZWJ-c4UUu6jORJ2hNkyRtZNJWAajV8c X-Proofpoint-GUID: fHEaxu9BxaKZHjkXw-QPgtVu46SBGqye X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.545,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-11-04_09,2022-11-03_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2210170000 definitions=main-2211040093 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" There's enough separation between the parent and private structs now, that it is fine to remove the release completion hack. Signed-off-by: Eric Farman Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato --- drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c | 14 +------------- drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h | 3 --- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_op= s.c index e45d4acb109b..8a929a9cf3c6 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ static int vfio_ccw_mdev_init_dev(struct vfio_device *vde= v) INIT_LIST_HEAD(&private->crw); INIT_WORK(&private->io_work, vfio_ccw_sch_io_todo); INIT_WORK(&private->crw_work, vfio_ccw_crw_todo); - init_completion(&private->release_comp); =20 private->cp.guest_cp =3D kcalloc(CCWCHAIN_LEN_MAX, sizeof(struct ccw1), GFP_KERNEL); @@ -137,7 +136,7 @@ static void vfio_ccw_mdev_release_dev(struct vfio_devic= e *vdev) struct vfio_ccw_private *private =3D container_of(vdev, struct vfio_ccw_private, vdev); =20 - complete(&private->release_comp); + vfio_ccw_free_private(private); } =20 static void vfio_ccw_mdev_remove(struct mdev_device *mdev) @@ -155,17 +154,6 @@ static void vfio_ccw_mdev_remove(struct mdev_device *m= dev) =20 dev_set_drvdata(&parent->dev, NULL); vfio_put_device(&private->vdev); - /* - * Wait for all active references on mdev are released so it - * is safe to defer kfree() to a later point. - * - * TODO: the clean fix is to split parent/mdev info from ccw - * private structure so each can be managed in its own life - * cycle. - */ - wait_for_completion(&private->release_comp); - - vfio_ccw_free_private(private); } =20 static int vfio_ccw_mdev_open_device(struct vfio_device *vdev) diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_cc= w_private.h index 747aba5f5272..2278fd38d34e 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h @@ -102,7 +102,6 @@ struct vfio_ccw_parent { * @req_trigger: eventfd ctx for signaling userspace to return device * @io_work: work for deferral process of I/O handling * @crw_work: work for deferral process of CRW handling - * @release_comp: synchronization helper for vfio device release */ struct vfio_ccw_private { struct vfio_device vdev; @@ -126,8 +125,6 @@ struct vfio_ccw_private { struct eventfd_ctx *req_trigger; struct work_struct io_work; struct work_struct crw_work; - - struct completion release_comp; } __aligned(8); =20 int vfio_ccw_sch_quiesce(struct subchannel *sch); --=20 2.34.1