From nobody Tue Apr 7 14:53:59 2026 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3775BECAAA6 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 17:01:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344936AbiHZRBt (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2022 13:01:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46488 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344904AbiHZRBc (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2022 13:01:32 -0400 Received: from NAM12-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-mw2nam12on2060.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.244.60]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5B6FC9E86; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 10:01:13 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=m0+EtaKcvVnb+cmffabNnP4Fp4CBd42zbil6oxyhTYwJxNj+fTgcbQV+0l8Q467pXDQL+Wc1+iPCJBV9sQe3Sglh/JaDHUqp8Ts418KThnE3ZDBvb5tPPqju3U6Cq7Ux9NuLKe+GjKn802uFkMBZ2+j96EdrhoQ9CiE5po2UFYlzPpg90BmtNieEgS1/HEUVY3BD2r+jN/AwLToIUPk5rZ7ueHDKmFbOk1OvSzPKU/ouneO9mbxu4gWleWjFHHy1Chaykt6ynw6H+BkMh2+4su3Wx0C1Ek4SfvwiNiQV0P11hehj+YNZVUEkymP79tmeys6pZ6ePZKt6F3s0NPZHDg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=DED61T5UkJy76XMNgi8aqJ78Tx1z+ZX3gqOWnGwEaTQ=; b=oVBStZNrg5LqcUQgXM/Uw7rm+4OhzTkmaxhkR4F7MIq2L8f9cBuiiPjJUrQ8lTuwlnWSuZwQCUQz9X23KYtej2HSRC0URvtxF43bBf4/iJbryj5SJCWH+JqctpQ855xOKFKSz9v/f0KJSJARMVOTecoBnm17cQ/tdwrEdUHGt3dV7Qk/yQyTeHk3TYbRxB5rD42Q5QVIx413TOoDJxQjBv0sVPN6Lw/l5fUXXwVbX43p8ie9fDt/hE2dB9NPW7c2SAlP4HDRPYZ1JqkXgNoQVQE2CzPHaibdeTp3gI7KuRQGoeTBkJ4h+IGKuw8ehUJhHcmMjOl8niGPC9f+sV78Zg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 165.204.84.17) smtp.rcpttodomain=redhat.com smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine sp=quarantine pct=100) action=none header.from=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amd.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=DED61T5UkJy76XMNgi8aqJ78Tx1z+ZX3gqOWnGwEaTQ=; b=3B1DymodkG0P9mgowBWhjL1TP2+RIuxPC9//4Cw+VVdyBFZJ/xYiacsoGy6R6SVyl1Vt4aZOffeFIZx9Xq57kqWHPru5eNEWkwuaQ1wy//JXOBamQsbyLX/tNIVIkru4zy04+WbWQndv1M1Hkgk+EiPFUPFzgWzl3b4ElCMLpEw= Received: from MW4PR03CA0125.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:8c::10) by DM6PR12MB3660.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:1c3::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5566.15; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 17:01:10 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM11FT093.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:8c:cafe::cf) by MW4PR03CA0125.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:303:8c::10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5566.14 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 17:01:10 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 165.204.84.17) smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=amd.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of amd.com designates 165.204.84.17 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=165.204.84.17; helo=SATLEXMB04.amd.com; pr=C Received: from SATLEXMB04.amd.com (165.204.84.17) by CO1NAM11FT093.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.175.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.20.5566.15 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 17:01:09 +0000 Received: from AUS-LX-MLIMONCI.amd.com (10.180.168.240) by SATLEXMB04.amd.com (10.181.40.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.28; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 12:01:02 -0500 From: Mario Limonciello To: , Hans de Goede , "Mark Gross" CC: , Subject: [PATCH] platform/x86: wmi: Lower verbosity of some duplicate GUID messages Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 12:00:53 -0500 Message-ID: <20220826170053.2124-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [10.180.168.240] X-ClientProxiedBy: SATLEXMB04.amd.com (10.181.40.145) To SATLEXMB04.amd.com (10.181.40.145) X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 1755bffa-e6be-4524-caab-08da87849324 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: DM6PR12MB3660:EE_ X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:165.204.84.17;CTRY:US;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:CAL;SFV:NSPM;H:SATLEXMB04.amd.com;PTR:InfoDomainNonexistent;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230016)(4636009)(376002)(396003)(39860400002)(136003)(346002)(40470700004)(46966006)(36840700001)(41300700001)(5660300002)(8936002)(26005)(356005)(82740400003)(316002)(478600001)(40480700001)(40460700003)(15650500001)(966005)(44832011)(36756003)(7696005)(6666004)(86362001)(16526019)(81166007)(2906002)(1076003)(426003)(2616005)(336012)(70206006)(82310400005)(36860700001)(110136005)(54906003)(186003)(4326008)(8676002)(47076005)(70586007)(83380400001)(36900700001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: amd.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Aug 2022 17:01:09.8566 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 1755bffa-e6be-4524-caab-08da87849324 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d;Ip=[165.204.84.17];Helo=[SATLEXMB04.amd.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CO1NAM11FT093.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR12MB3660 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The WMI subsystem in the kernel currently tracks WMI devices by a GUID string not by ACPI device. The GUID used by the `wmi-bmof` module however is available from many devices on nearly every machine. This originally was though to be a bug, but as it happens on most machines it is a design mistake. As there isn't an active need to get the binary from each of the `wmi-bmof` device, special case it and lower the message to debugging. This will help to identify if there are other duplicate GUIDs in the wild. If there are and the information contained in them is desirable it may be worth considering a design change to the WMI subsystem to access those. Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/8/913 Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello --- drivers/platform/x86/wmi-bmof.c | 2 -- drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c | 10 ++++++++-- include/linux/wmi.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi-bmof.c b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi-bmo= f.c index 80137afb9753..af46e9e03376 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi-bmof.c +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi-bmof.c @@ -18,8 +18,6 @@ #include #include =20 -#define WMI_BMOF_GUID "05901221-D566-11D1-B2F0-00A0C9062910" - struct bmof_priv { union acpi_object *bmofdata; struct bin_attribute bmof_bin_attr; diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c index aed293b5af81..d7a1f4bf443b 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c @@ -1157,6 +1157,9 @@ static void wmi_free_devices(struct acpi_device *devi= ce) static bool guid_already_parsed(struct acpi_device *device, const guid_t *= guid) { struct wmi_block *wblock; + guid_t guid_wmi_bmof; + + guid_parse(WMI_BMOF_GUID, &guid_wmi_bmof); =20 list_for_each_entry(wblock, &wmi_block_list, list) { if (guid_equal(&wblock->gblock.guid, guid)) { @@ -1166,8 +1169,11 @@ static bool guid_already_parsed(struct acpi_device *= device, const guid_t *guid) * we need to suppress GUIDs that are unique on a * given node but duplicated across nodes. */ - dev_warn(&device->dev, "duplicate WMI GUID %pUL (first instance was on = %s)\n", - guid, dev_name(&wblock->acpi_device->dev)); + if (guid_equal(guid, &guid_wmi_bmof)) + dev_dbg(&device->dev, "duplicate WMI-BMOF GUID found\n"); + else + dev_warn(&device->dev, "duplicate WMI GUID %pUL (first instance was on= %s)\n", + guid, dev_name(&wblock->acpi_device->dev)); return true; } } diff --git a/include/linux/wmi.h b/include/linux/wmi.h index b88d7b58e61e..59acdceb4411 100644 --- a/include/linux/wmi.h +++ b/include/linux/wmi.h @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ #include #include =20 +#define WMI_BMOF_GUID "05901221-D566-11D1-B2F0-00A0C9062910" + struct wmi_device { struct device dev; =20 --=20 2.34.1