From nobody Tue Jun 23 20:24:35 2026 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B155CC433F5 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 08:46:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229958AbiB0Iqi (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Feb 2022 03:46:38 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47336 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229742AbiB0Iqg (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Feb 2022 03:46:36 -0500 Received: from smtpbg156.qq.com (smtpbg156.qq.com [15.184.82.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D24E258E7E for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 00:45:55 -0800 (PST) X-QQ-mid: bizesmtp75t1645951549tnaiglpy Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [202.96.137.248]) by bizesmtp.qq.com (ESMTP) with id ; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 16:45:45 +0800 (CST) X-QQ-SSF: 01400000000000D0N000B00A0000000 X-QQ-FEAT: F3yR32iATbhJMNxbc1/wHAQGmD/mIVH+L6iJric5H1HxFw0Rc/4TH6koD28EC BZGDGp1ca3151OwASk12UNvw/9uLV/zZn1fXLgKOz8Cgi1WDVcEDOWFcdc8O7NCr4eZPME9 fnWuqrH2gRYU84H9ShkHAQFR/XiX1GEchO1oWWUX26vwzHqd81oN/zepy+IwvpvUtBZVcIw bfwm8bsbiOYCiq2l48ydRXUE0jSjOHgy3SI8Tbpm97ZE/PefMOjYBhJKI3wYcYHyDXetPua 0QU17TPRHZvmXnwHPLbYlXff7UU6DFr2L9lkdMSclXgeTxh3Qpp9tckupRAL5buZAjVfFBj EGfgHZa X-QQ-GoodBg: 2 From: Yixuan Cao To: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yixuan Cao Subject: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc.c: fix a comment Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 16:45:44 +0800 Message-Id: <20220227084544.4681-1-caoyixuan2019@email.szu.edu.cn> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520 Feedback-ID: bizesmtp:email.szu.edu.cn:qybgforeign:qybgforeign1 X-QQ-Bgrelay: 1 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Dear Sir/Madam, The sentence "but the mempolcy want to alloc memory by interleaving" should be rephrased with "but the mempolicy wants to alloc memory by interleaving" where "mempolicy" is a struct name. Thanks and best regards, Yixuan Cao Signed-off-by: Yixuan Cao --- mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c index b454cf1a261f..89d48d8eb20c 100644 --- a/mm/vmalloc.c +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c @@ -2905,7 +2905,7 @@ vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int nid, /* memory allocation should consider mempolicy, we can't * wrongly use nearest node when nid =3D=3D NUMA_NO_NODE, * otherwise memory may be allocated in only one node, - * but mempolcy want to alloc memory by interleaving. + * but mempolicy want to alloc memory by interleaving. */ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) && nid =3D=3D NUMA_NO_NODE) nr =3D alloc_pages_bulk_array_mempolicy(bulk_gfp, --=20 2.31.1