From nobody Mon Jun 29 21:04:20 2026 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF61C433FE for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 21:10:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1347444AbiBBVKp (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2022 16:10:45 -0500 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:55101 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1347458AbiBBVKh (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2022 16:10:37 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1643836237; x=1675372237; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=iMWumcGhp4QWhnuLTMkak/W/OcXG87n/jUcrqAHhooc=; b=XzH+WgfPZ5Pv0I+2+XJOIPu4RigYn/WEiQRpZiXOz3YX+jrizbQOfM3o nmvdXqjJlQpdtFXPnTx72k8xLkNBV3cj3IdUcYuusr64xTTZ3Bkd0+5Hg 5KWgWMuGJRXEotHJE0cHA6izNUXaZ4a1BxH8MEPeeCcge7oA8UO22apbt DZ9Fa4P4nm5Lqzs4462HWRBOIV9bNAKY2yiih8uy4Y39pj+u9L6hfEo2f xXUGK1MYj6pvLWcn/AArX6OlCg4ezMKZ4AlXs8lOLc5QMbcmbiAjJzq+R uZYY66EGwdXh5yId0N/8M1izpIrqhGWRE/p9ZsjmwhLnKVyQ0rVKqzAnL Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10246"; a="308749204" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,337,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="308749204" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Feb 2022 13:10:29 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,337,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="699056130" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 276f1b88eecb) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Feb 2022 13:10:27 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 276f1b88eecb with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nFMtW-000V8Q-Ni; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 21:10:26 +0000 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 05:09:43 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Jorgen Hansen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, pv-drivers@vmware.com, Jorgen Hansen , Vishnu Dasa Subject: [RFC PATCH] VMCI: dma dg: vmci_read_reg() can be static Message-ID: <20220202210943.GA88437@f185d0c9484e> References: <20220202144910.10349-3-jhansen@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220202144910.10349-3-jhansen@vmware.com> X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c:93:14: warning: symbol 'vmci_read_reg' w= as not declared. Should it be static? drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c:100:6: warning: symbol 'vmci_write_reg' = was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: kernel test robot --- vmci_guest.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c b/drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmc= i_guest.c index d00430e5aba36..081f7b0c23f5f 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c +++ b/drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c @@ -90,14 +90,14 @@ u32 vmci_get_vm_context_id(void) return vm_context_id; } =20 -unsigned int vmci_read_reg(struct vmci_guest_device *dev, u32 reg) +static unsigned int vmci_read_reg(struct vmci_guest_device *dev, u32 reg) { if (dev->mmio_base !=3D NULL) return readl(dev->mmio_base + reg); return ioread32(dev->iobase + reg); } =20 -void vmci_write_reg(struct vmci_guest_device *dev, u32 val, u32 reg) +static void vmci_write_reg(struct vmci_guest_device *dev, u32 val, u32 reg) { if (dev->mmio_base !=3D NULL) writel(val, dev->mmio_base + reg);