From nobody Thu Nov 21 16:01:18 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of lists.xenproject.org designates 192.237.175.120 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.237.175.120; envelope-from=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org; helo=lists.xenproject.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of lists.xenproject.org designates 192.237.175.120 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org; dmarc=pass(p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1724910930; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=np6c/u6d6IU7IWEKcGKJpr4jexpoTW6RiUDAN9/hi05KLUDmkF8BvqHDiDJ3rvtZ/7PDrppXHft3VRSPBU8Eh3IIsMYQhU9NPs5yXYPoygv8a/efmazLjJUCaojJ0B8orgXX+TTTC5jksUeiZfGGVn8GFonjJ4u155ZylX+D1wU= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1724910930; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Sender:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=TChNeicFWEvZRxp5rEEVegR0lK4vwAbrXE7Ewib5yl8=; b=Pq79qTeLK6Nf6tKhLbyVmZ30UfZYcP9Zhq8/nrc0liNT4Dh3d2r7vbJenz6b9qNeSbqLA+rke51fzP3wXtMTocssEnF8pYyscob3+RC/qd8X4Q5+8JC5JDAfP4Y9Kk9IQVHbGZv1dNWi50Kex72Kl9QOS7uvD+Rx/n8x9Yxa9EA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of lists.xenproject.org designates 192.237.175.120 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org; dmarc=pass header.from= (p=quarantine dis=none) Return-Path: Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 172491093089916.47663240598399; Wed, 28 Aug 2024 22:55:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.785450.1194888 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sjY7k-0003D1-9h; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 05:55:12 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 785450.1194888; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 05:55:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sjY7k-0003Cu-6X; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 05:55:12 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 785450; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 05:55:11 +0000 Received: from se1-gles-sth1-in.inumbo.com ([159.253.27.254] helo=se1-gles-sth1.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sjY7i-0003Co-Uw for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 05:55:11 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com (mail-lf1-x135.google.com [2a00:1450:4864:20::135]) by se1-gles-sth1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 3f85b0b2-65cb-11ef-a0b0-8be0dac302b0; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 07:55:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5334b0e1a8eso325363e87.0 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2024 22:55:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.156.60.236] (ip-037-024-206-209.um08.pools.vodafone-ip.de. [37.24.206.209]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-a8988feb112sm31713966b.39.2024.08.28.22.55.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Aug 2024 22:55:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 3f85b0b2-65cb-11ef-a0b0-8be0dac302b0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=google; t=1724910908; x=1725515708; darn=lists.xenproject.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:autocrypt:subject:from:cc:to :content-language:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TChNeicFWEvZRxp5rEEVegR0lK4vwAbrXE7Ewib5yl8=; b=dGBAL4swy2XlWp0WNSKV9DA8nJ+lI+3T1zhVuExSs8Fseg0jYP5CcI/zgLpSxIoeFl zmQIOSijCo1tnaj8tgTfWaBFUMRVz3LkXWOW5t37hQHaoh73sXeGTnz6X5T3LnErRGwT qCPgRMd0oV6fENvN0BtJ+OTo+sQYCzqEP0x26euPIYZcrkMmCsyTBkTLkE7wxsqgXeT7 ObS04OJOoEo72MvHBuWwbQbog9T/7l+3tRPjIThX+KMSQXsy8HS50R9qK61eh3tdcnjM cL91bj/l1yrzP92NfEpIB1pPte4yWvAtq/w4SX4ftNwrDs6VfYYX2e3ZQLAOiK8jWnnU 1IpQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1724910908; x=1725515708; h=content-transfer-encoding:autocrypt:subject:from:cc:to :content-language:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TChNeicFWEvZRxp5rEEVegR0lK4vwAbrXE7Ewib5yl8=; b=T2Cum6PjoQ47BjPfVy+PdmN3T3V9jYHVPCltz/tjueBuzTg1wVq+aS5//7kJ7H+lWC mk43Fw3XCsYQgmCucnNE3yrD3LkrTrdruG9PDKMDMywBQQmIQdh+iL0cHploWBvasDnb QBzc+9HeG6HdCfvDprwindTm/gdSZbrM5EgB2JngDIBoceJkigOewwMNjdwIXecrziG2 dFmTxU22eNn/WvgeI4fUiHEz5oHIWKfOoZ3pJhXcZFyz2HPtFRlwfH8VP+mdJIVZryR5 rn/E67BGQWJ9//hsGraLhG37e4X8mVlm+Oc8zpXScqXVQA8RZiverQwZdnBv5y3hVAy6 WzKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxSOzOJwPyvnjb54C8G0xWPBONeRmP7pAcvESOB0UVA4Le7N4MB ppJfSQkvjB4Xo7Vf7vWmKgoDZEgZxlNSaiiaXhLEY0A34QI77XYqkCOFYdebRkuJ7uT0MJ02GVw = X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGEZVS9fixFILZZKvdr8rWtiNHg0swOH2e2TQEZMm4TGDdKtU3nb1kOJBXVRQEhLURtF/YeZA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:2210:b0:52e:d0f8:2d30 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5353e5be49emr1072170e87.59.1724910908368; Wed, 28 Aug 2024 22:55:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9cc9e16d-a4b0-4902-9f12-a7cb337b1763@suse.com> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 07:55:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" Cc: Julien Grall , Stefano Stabellini , Volodymyr Babchuk , Bertrand Marquis , Michal Orzel From: Jan Beulich Subject: [PATCH] Arm64: adjust __irq_to_desc() to fix build with gcc14 Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@suse.com; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMail-DKIM: pass (identity @suse.com) X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1724910932593116600 With the original code I observe In function =E2=80=98__irq_to_desc=E2=80=99, inlined from =E2=80=98route_irq_to_guest=E2=80=99 at arch/arm/irq.c:465= :12: arch/arm/irq.c:54:16: error: array subscript -2 is below array bounds of = =E2=80=98irq_desc_t[32]=E2=80=99 {aka =E2=80=98struct irq_desc[32]=E2=80=99= } [-Werror=3Darray-bounds=3D] 54 | return &this_cpu(local_irq_desc)[irq]; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ which looks pretty bogus: How in the world does the compiler arrive at -2 when compiling route_irq_to_guest()? Yet independent of that the function's parameter wants to be of unsigned type anyway, as shown by a vast majority of callers (others use plain int when they really mean non-negative quantities). With that adjustment the code compiles fine again. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Acked-by: Michal Orzel --- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D116519 --- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/irq.h +++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/irq.h @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ extern const unsigned int nr_irqs; struct irq_desc; struct irqaction; =20 -struct irq_desc *__irq_to_desc(int irq); +struct irq_desc *__irq_to_desc(unsigned int irq); =20 #define irq_to_desc(irq) __irq_to_desc(irq) =20 --- unstable.orig/xen/arch/arm/irq.c 2024-06-28 15:56:44.000000000 +0200 +++ unstable/xen/arch/arm/irq.c 2024-08-28 15:12:10.333607505 +0200 @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ void irq_end_none(struct irq_desc *irq) static irq_desc_t irq_desc[NR_IRQS]; static DEFINE_PER_CPU(irq_desc_t[NR_LOCAL_IRQS], local_irq_desc); =20 -struct irq_desc *__irq_to_desc(int irq) +struct irq_desc *__irq_to_desc(unsigned int irq) { if ( irq < NR_LOCAL_IRQS ) return &this_cpu(local_irq_desc)[irq];