From nobody Mon Feb 9 09:47:18 2026 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of lists.xenproject.org designates 192.237.175.120 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.237.175.120; envelope-from=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org; helo=lists.xenproject.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of lists.xenproject.org designates 192.237.175.120 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Return-Path: Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1709896903965733.49290318393; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 03:21:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.690226.1076060 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1riYHv-0007fF-Sz; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 11:21:19 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 690226.1076060; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 11:21:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1riYHv-0007du-KY; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 11:21:19 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 690226; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 11:21:18 +0000 Received: from se1-gles-flk1-in.inumbo.com ([94.247.172.50] helo=se1-gles-flk1.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1riYHu-00067H-G7 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 11:21:18 +0000 Received: from support.bugseng.com (mail.bugseng.com [162.55.131.47]) by se1-gles-flk1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id f9d9c3dd-dd3d-11ee-a1ee-f123f15fe8a2; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 12:21:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from nico.bugseng.com (unknown [46.228.253.194]) by support.bugseng.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E37C4EE0752; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 12:21:14 +0100 (CET) X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: f9d9c3dd-dd3d-11ee-a1ee-f123f15fe8a2 From: Nicola Vetrini To: nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: sstabellini@kernel.org, michal.orzel@amd.com, xenia.ragiadakou@amd.com, ayan.kumar.halder@amd.com, consulting@bugseng.com, bertrand.marquis@arm.com, julien@xen.org, Rahul Singh , Volodymyr Babchuk Subject: [XEN PATCH v2 7/7] arm/smmu: address some violations of MISRA C Rule 20.7 Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 12:21:04 +0100 Message-Id: <21369cdaa0aa34253716d4c999956faee60445ab.1709896401.git.nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1709896904620100001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini --- xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/a= rm/smmu.c index 625ed0e41961..83196057a937 100644 --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_xen_device { struct iommu_group *group; }; =20 -#define dev_archdata(dev) ((struct arm_smmu_xen_device *)dev->iommu) +#define dev_archdata(dev) ((struct arm_smmu_xen_device *)(dev)->iommu) #define dev_iommu_domain(dev) (dev_archdata(dev)->domain) #define dev_iommu_group(dev) (dev_archdata(dev)->group) =20 @@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_master_cfg { }; #define INVALID_SMENDX -1 #define for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, i, idx, num) \ - for (i =3D 0; idx =3D cfg->smendx[i], i < num; ++i) + for (i =3D 0; idx =3D (cfg)->smendx[i], (i) < (num); ++(i)) =20 struct arm_smmu_master { struct device_node *of_node; --=20 2.34.1