From nobody Mon Nov 3 06:56:05 2025 Received: from mail.lony.xyz (lony.xyz [172.105.251.223]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2BA01F9ECD for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 09:05:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=172.105.251.223 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733130347; cv=none; b=LyYilklFyfwKmY0mn4l1ErteoEtoCvMeWLVtC8dE3prVqbkw2dsP95ZpvMlh5qJ5ciHP0/iNDdFFdcfz83FykIWdBysHUPqacZqvq4FcaP16mMlL5H02SIA97X/Vd4riv+Dxqhfit0pUNgdcFIXPy2AyTDbenEfgQb1id/DZAf4= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733130347; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kIELQPf0ilImOOICBrG5igCu85Wt8+2BqJaPkbUMfgU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ukfV++ceE1qDjxEQccUbgDMoRd9voWDdZOTXCyCZajMj/E9GNruKIrAsbA8BCH/tcO7tfjjceFpHVoxfRyMyYiNOchruVmIAN8IfAFOaoI6SwC9VIBW80ApQtkWTwVMXgrX3UQYNgMyWQRLh4BvCyXTAfys0pn5B+tBdHOmBI9U= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=lony.xyz; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lony.xyz; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) header.d=lony.xyz header.i=@lony.xyz header.b=MWYA0Tiv reason="signature verification failed"; arc=none smtp.client-ip=172.105.251.223 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=lony.xyz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lony.xyz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=lony.xyz header.i=@lony.xyz header.b="MWYA0Tiv" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=lony.xyz; s=mail; t=1733129959; bh=kIELQPf0ilImOOICBrG5igCu85Wt8+2BqJaPkbUMfgU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=MWYA0TivS7lrWrXGSYlFyLtvwX6tD1PVUiv+AbTNWo3WlN4cXp47guGwYuXmS7NBd sU7cMXkE1nAZyZWNnd1RztXEh5cJtxVkgUOcT0Msj5mNpiaBieYZOkBcVe69jL9B5n TNmAnuDbpzdEvnULC0c1exTe0GOqAobKD2Wa1Na9b/3qov7lpHb5Q8FjqX9W5mr/F+ NS4vrYDiHp4DlsChKAVaX6mh+TkY6P3P4AEGFrpygT8MOmfPr7d/CooJp4CXLpnF4M KCpF7G9EEWMRqrM7qAJ+a4yaia5bvfUzRGOO/IsVAVljypkfJwHQUt0Y2xP4Oi04Lb QRm70mTHrVuwg== From: =?UTF-8?q?Sergio=20Migu=C3=A9ns=20Iglesias?= To: archjgross@suse.com Cc: sstabellini@kernel.org, oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?q?Sergio=20Migu=C3=A9ns=20Iglesias?= , Juergen Gross Subject: [PATCH] xen: pcpu: remove unnecessary __ref annotation Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 09:59:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20241202085910.5539-1-sergio@lony.xyz> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The __ref annotation has been there since the beginning of time, but no calls to __init functions exist inside it, and the compilation of the Xen driver does not output any warnings when removed. Cc: Juergen Gross Cc: Stefano Stabellini Cc: Oleksandr Tyshchenko Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sergio Migu=C3=A9ns Iglesias Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross --- drivers/xen/pcpu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/xen/pcpu.c b/drivers/xen/pcpu.c index c63f317e3df3..093ad4a08672 100644 --- a/drivers/xen/pcpu.c +++ b/drivers/xen/pcpu.c @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static ssize_t online_show(struct device *dev, return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", !!(cpu->flags & XEN_PCPU_FLAGS_ONLINE)); } =20 -static ssize_t __ref online_store(struct device *dev, +static ssize_t online_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count) { --=20 2.47.0