From nobody Thu Nov 14 18:04:39 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of lists.xenproject.org designates 192.237.175.120 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.237.175.120; envelope-from=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org; helo=lists.xenproject.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of lists.xenproject.org designates 192.237.175.120 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org; dmarc=pass(p=reject dis=none) header.from=cloud.com ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1729525606; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=PcYN5g9Xlj9SYmSN2hHQQWQsoSqPK99eiglnFrbb2og0pCnoCCpQKmT0S47/6wNyT1va55mCF4eHkx7NMksf1TlrHxkl6mcQ8gEfo96G9qZuq8J3VHSTGeCCDsWok8bQatBqQJPUvKcVRcjj2cx3Xqt1WjNBSJ2u6TdP5Oq+gP8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1729525606; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Sender:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=eLoTPwH/b49P11LPnPYXfCXJJX0udy5YrCnU2/Yv3Q8=; b=JKTPDJaOX7rIjMI4FM+PEFyp2rfj61ovtYVNINpQF8+WYTnn9RtkZfJluZnzGfF2xz5qXqPvKpZXzVdKUwUmzv9LGJn7O++kHSdkjy7MTCagllFXr3HbcDh5uN2bPacgRUeJSIJqPyrYuKi80fSCM9QASghWfCewmRRz1TfEuW0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of lists.xenproject.org designates 192.237.175.120 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org; dmarc=pass header.from= (p=reject dis=none) Return-Path: Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1729525606599105.51546194669743; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 08:46:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.823743.1237858 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1t2uc7-0000co-Od; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 15:46:35 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 823743.1237858; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 15:46:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1t2uc7-0000Yz-A4; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 15:46:35 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 823743; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 15:46:33 +0000 Received: from se1-gles-sth1-in.inumbo.com ([159.253.27.254] helo=se1-gles-sth1.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1t2uc5-00072f-8B for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 15:46:33 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-x129.google.com (mail-lf1-x129.google.com [2a00:1450:4864:20::129]) by se1-gles-sth1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id a5497378-8fc3-11ef-a0be-8be0dac302b0; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 17:46:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lf1-x129.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-539e1543ab8so7757360e87.2 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 08:46:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (0545937c.skybroadband.com. [5.69.147.124]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-a9a91370fe5sm215688966b.112.2024.10.21.08.46.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 21 Oct 2024 08:46:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: a5497378-8fc3-11ef-a0be-8be0dac302b0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloud.com; s=cloud; t=1729525592; x=1730130392; darn=lists.xenproject.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=eLoTPwH/b49P11LPnPYXfCXJJX0udy5YrCnU2/Yv3Q8=; b=TZiH5fQzDmBSYxkHYc4E8iKOuLHjb9hgosDXyRrwAO91dS3rn6XJqeleqKdDp9WkQk hW0gXLdcbdx5kAMBBsW8hlAD0e1oYdxtNEqxh0Np0UUHcpRC7QqGy17CFUnyEyMtXjLI KZjE/RcrscVKwuz0Cm7YWyq4ZG6KBA+dI9Mq0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1729525592; x=1730130392; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=eLoTPwH/b49P11LPnPYXfCXJJX0udy5YrCnU2/Yv3Q8=; b=UY4iIUgrOsebtQf2gPyvW6zQFIMC3D+oJJfMqzlNkOx0VkOAA2fbwlUxHooReGJWzG PQXjL3hMtE/R/yGwJWuGQGlYjH04Uwbu9TsBg30F4S7AVv1qv2U1pGuBEgboTB+6OId7 ufCQv6hgOaNWmaD99WnX59OB6/lJ0Gi3ozog2dZPo6iw59i8lrp60/YlGJEIJQQ+XfAO 4ewAE2Hh5fVO6EBSrCauoroCHT1Ze0gouTWp0xo69p3gK+7mkV3HhbUCiLntYpZUe7za sHAIdJddbiP61EdRQAf9zw2wFtHv2w3/YzqAxQMbNPtqOxLAAOMUh6+NfErR8xgOtyEu +P9Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzDOQrEgNjPP/ErsMb4FyxLnyAHh2fEYHUkajixwtfMq8KsPNKq EGAin/5tpTKkTStObCVSJ217KtO8XCdzia9FRQnF+emc7Cor+67wijqZJDV8hDJjkiMF1cdxcGO 1 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEKI3F754OZTMcPDYuuXAH9Oj+SnjFeFSVHzQIMr0uet8yShlvwWryHEeCKjJKW5m2/CM2Iqg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1244:b0:536:a7a4:c3d4 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-53a154c9f17mr10083781e87.39.1729525591793; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 08:46:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Alejandro Vallejo To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: Alejandro Vallejo , Anthony PERARD , Juergen Gross , Jan Beulich , Andrew Cooper , =?UTF-8?q?Roger=20Pau=20Monn=C3=A9?= Subject: [PATCH v7 10/10] tools/x86: Synthesise domain topologies Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 16:46:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20241021154600.11745-11-alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.0 In-Reply-To: <20241021154600.11745-1-alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com> References: <20241021154600.11745-1-alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMail-DKIM: pass (identity @cloud.com) X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1729525608846116600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Expose sensible topologies in leaf 0xb. At the moment it synthesises non-HT systems, in line with the previous code intent. Leaf 0xb in the host policy is no longer zapped and the guest {max,def} policies have their topology leaves zapped instead. The intent is for toolstack to populate them. There's no current use for the topology information in the host policy, but it makes no harm. Signed-off-by: Alejandro Vallejo --- v7: * No changes --- tools/include/xenguest.h | 3 +++ tools/libs/guest/xg_cpuid_x86.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- tools/libs/light/libxl_dom.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++- xen/arch/x86/cpu-policy.c | 9 ++++++--- 4 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/include/xenguest.h b/tools/include/xenguest.h index aa50b78dfb89..dcabf219b9cb 100644 --- a/tools/include/xenguest.h +++ b/tools/include/xenguest.h @@ -831,6 +831,9 @@ int xc_set_domain_cpu_policy(xc_interface *xch, uint32_= t domid, =20 uint32_t xc_get_cpu_featureset_size(void); =20 +/* Returns the APIC ID of the `cpu`-th CPU according to `policy` */ +uint32_t xc_cpu_to_apicid(const xc_cpu_policy_t *policy, unsigned int cpu); + enum xc_static_cpu_featuremask { XC_FEATUREMASK_KNOWN, XC_FEATUREMASK_SPECIAL, diff --git a/tools/libs/guest/xg_cpuid_x86.c b/tools/libs/guest/xg_cpuid_x8= 6.c index 4453178100ad..c591f8732a1a 100644 --- a/tools/libs/guest/xg_cpuid_x86.c +++ b/tools/libs/guest/xg_cpuid_x86.c @@ -725,8 +725,16 @@ int xc_cpuid_apply_policy(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t = domid, bool restore, p->policy.basic.htt =3D test_bit(X86_FEATURE_HTT, host_featu= reset); p->policy.extd.cmp_legacy =3D test_bit(X86_FEATURE_CMP_LEGACY, hos= t_featureset); } - else + else if ( restore ) { + /* + * Reconstruct the topology exposed on Xen <=3D 4.13. It makes ver= y little + * sense, but it's what those guests saw so it's set in stone now. + * + * Guests from Xen 4.14 onwards carry their own CPUID leaves in the + * migration stream so they don't need special treatment. + */ + /* * Topology for HVM guests is entirely controlled by Xen. For now= , we * hardcode APIC_ID =3D vcpu_id * 2 to give the illusion of no SMT. @@ -782,6 +790,20 @@ int xc_cpuid_apply_policy(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t = domid, bool restore, break; } } + else + { + /* TODO: Expose the ability to choose a custom topology for HVM/PV= H */ + unsigned int threads_per_core =3D 1; + unsigned int cores_per_pkg =3D di.max_vcpu_id + 1; + + rc =3D x86_topo_from_parts(&p->policy, threads_per_core, cores_per= _pkg); + if ( rc ) + { + ERROR("Failed to generate topology: rc=3D%d t/c=3D%u c/p=3D%u", + rc, threads_per_core, cores_per_pkg); + goto out; + } + } =20 nr_leaves =3D ARRAY_SIZE(p->leaves); rc =3D x86_cpuid_copy_to_buffer(&p->policy, p->leaves, &nr_leaves); @@ -1028,3 +1050,8 @@ bool xc_cpu_policy_is_compatible(xc_interface *xch, x= c_cpu_policy_t *host, =20 return false; } + +uint32_t xc_cpu_to_apicid(const xc_cpu_policy_t *policy, unsigned int cpu) +{ + return x86_x2apic_id_from_vcpu_id(&policy->policy, cpu); +} diff --git a/tools/libs/light/libxl_dom.c b/tools/libs/light/libxl_dom.c index 5f4f6830e850..1d7c34820d8f 100644 --- a/tools/libs/light/libxl_dom.c +++ b/tools/libs/light/libxl_dom.c @@ -1063,6 +1063,9 @@ int libxl__build_hvm(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t domid, libxl_domain_build_info *const info =3D &d_config->b_info; struct xc_dom_image *dom =3D NULL; bool device_model =3D info->type =3D=3D LIBXL_DOMAIN_TYPE_HVM ? true := false; +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) + struct xc_cpu_policy *policy =3D NULL; +#endif =20 xc_dom_loginit(ctx->xch); =20 @@ -1083,8 +1086,22 @@ int libxl__build_hvm(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t domid, dom->container_type =3D XC_DOM_HVM_CONTAINER; =20 #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) + policy =3D xc_cpu_policy_init(); + if (!policy) { + LOGE(ERROR, "xc_cpu_policy_get_domain failed d%u", domid); + rc =3D ERROR_NOMEM; + goto out; + } + + rc =3D xc_cpu_policy_get_domain(ctx->xch, domid, policy); + if (rc !=3D 0) { + LOGE(ERROR, "xc_cpu_policy_get_domain failed d%u", domid); + rc =3D ERROR_FAIL; + goto out; + } + for (unsigned int i =3D 0; i < info->max_vcpus; i++) - dom->cpu_to_apicid[i] =3D 2 * i; /* TODO: Replace by topo calculat= ion */ + dom->cpu_to_apicid[i] =3D xc_cpu_to_apicid(policy, i); #endif =20 /* The params from the configuration file are in Mb, which are then @@ -1214,6 +1231,9 @@ int libxl__build_hvm(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t domid, out: assert(rc !=3D 0); if (dom !=3D NULL) xc_dom_release(dom); +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) + xc_cpu_policy_destroy(policy); +#endif return rc; } =20 diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/cpu-policy.c b/xen/arch/x86/cpu-policy.c index 715a66d2a978..a7e0d44cce78 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu-policy.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu-policy.c @@ -266,9 +266,6 @@ static void recalculate_misc(struct cpu_policy *p) =20 p->basic.raw[0x8] =3D EMPTY_LEAF; =20 - /* TODO: Rework topology logic. */ - memset(p->topo.raw, 0, sizeof(p->topo.raw)); - p->basic.raw[0xc] =3D EMPTY_LEAF; =20 p->extd.e1d &=3D ~CPUID_COMMON_1D_FEATURES; @@ -619,6 +616,9 @@ static void __init calculate_pv_max_policy(void) recalculate_xstate(p); =20 p->extd.raw[0xa] =3D EMPTY_LEAF; /* No SVM for PV guests. */ + + /* Wipe host topology. Populated by toolstack */ + memset(p->topo.raw, 0, sizeof(p->topo.raw)); } =20 static void __init calculate_pv_def_policy(void) @@ -785,6 +785,9 @@ static void __init calculate_hvm_max_policy(void) =20 /* It's always possible to emulate CPUID faulting for HVM guests */ p->platform_info.cpuid_faulting =3D true; + + /* Wipe host topology. Populated by toolstack */ + memset(p->topo.raw, 0, sizeof(p->topo.raw)); } =20 static void __init calculate_hvm_def_policy(void) --=20 2.47.0