From nobody Fri Sep 20 22:16:20 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of lists.xenproject.org designates 192.237.175.120 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.237.175.120; envelope-from=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org; helo=lists.xenproject.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of lists.xenproject.org designates 192.237.175.120 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Return-Path: Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1694427413200175.1447473570613; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 03:16:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.599234.934550 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qfdxj-0001mc-Nm; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 10:16:11 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 599234.934550; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 10:16:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qfdxj-0001mV-L9; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 10:16:11 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 599234; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 10:16:10 +0000 Received: from se1-gles-flk1-in.inumbo.com ([94.247.172.50] helo=se1-gles-flk1.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qfdxi-0001mP-6r for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 10:16:10 +0000 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by se1-gles-flk1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 340e78cc-508c-11ee-9b0d-b553b5be7939; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 12:16:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A7F5C0105; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 06:15:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 11 Sep 2023 06:15:58 -0400 Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 06:15:54 -0400 (EDT) X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 340e78cc-508c-11ee-9b0d-b553b5be7939 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= invisiblethingslab.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t= 1694427358; x=1694513758; bh=aPzNQ+neXMm/yZ8qPUfmvxpeUP/0YW8350J wnOmxA2U=; b=2cwVvj//HfqSw1BDYvqOm8bLc9HeElkkJaqyQUKBO49US2sU9LF NEtEYBw9eVxpCC28K5RoNobou1hWE7Byvsu/xd/Uj61muJOTNJNg4CIC9Qufgta2 VklRWmKdC8wcj1H/ZKhKjt25SuqiJb8XirSH0Q+6PvsaHDKUFddSATNjOQbOB0uL kcQwxcbhpaA+S9JIRqp579GCRn74TfUpNf64O4P1vJCPIKUC9cVpArvVI9vb5sPu dclYJ9RAcC0+i9r8kaBRxneHd2ZpNieSadzX6bvhPSOC+tafAEyS/Nllgy8Vt+ed AFYQMHi+pP23zx3UcMuF4NOwdYbkDF0vuCg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1694427358; x=1694513758; bh=aPzNQ+neXMm/y Z8qPUfmvxpeUP/0YW8350JwnOmxA2U=; b=LVV0DzKq28a52Dy6mMn6bz7aPyrGo Vcb6Sha0hlGIBIAcAERoURHdDzVaP0igJHCBUaOhyTX2D1lFUdmXgNqFeBAhRnE1 NLZaNoKuvW6w5PZJ3B+9Idfu2UAlw01+6EvRIduIZDpiKZpepmdARs1wF+Uw3kip C68CvvmII1UsheFfw3MGuT1HjedoH4DQM7fZbJotnA6euaM8GJ0aEHURopKqSfdl 7NNsg401HMpq2/8JQmTXVzX2WFXKjFJPhjyOLmU3t7U6eZNnDD8lLN/6R2fuNS99 B5mQKZnrrl25Z8zQz81e/1cwtjXFPZbwFBZuSR8L7z5wIrDScXT/GxM6A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedviedrudeigedgvdegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvvefufffkofgggfestdekredtredttdenucfhrhhomhepufhimhhonhcu ifgrihhsvghruceoshhimhhonhesihhnvhhishhisghlvghthhhinhhgshhlrggsrdgtoh hmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefghfeikedtkeeuveelkefhvdevhfelleekfefhudet heefhfeikeeludetfeevueenucffohhmrghinhepuhgvfhhirdhorhhgpdhkvghrnhgvlh drohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhm pehsihhmohhnsehinhhvihhsihgslhgvthhhihhnghhslhgrsgdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: idc5945a3:Fastmail From: Simon Gaiser To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: Simon Gaiser , Jan Beulich , Andrew Cooper , =?UTF-8?q?Roger=20Pau=20Monn=C3=A9?= , Wei Liu , =?UTF-8?q?Marek=20Marczykowski-G=C3=B3recki?= Subject: [XEN PATCH] x86/ACPI: Ignore entries marked as unusable when parsing MADT Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 12:12:38 +0200 Message-Id: <20230911101238.18005-1-simon@invisiblethingslab.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1694427414159100001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Up to version 6.2 Errata B [2] the ACPI spec only defines ACPI_MADT_ENABLE as: If zero, this processor is unusable, and the operating system support will not attempt to use it. The bit that later will be ACPI_MADT_ONLINE_CAPABLE is reserved with "Must be zero". Version 6.3 [3] then adds ACPI_MADT_ONLINE_CAPABLE and changes the meaning of ACPI_MADT_ENABLE: Enabled If this bit is set the processor is ready for use. If this bit is clear and the Online Capable bit is set, system hardware supports enabling this processor during OS runtime. If this bit is clear and the Online Capable bit is also clear, this processor is unusable, and OSPM shall ignore the contents of the Processor Local APIC Structure. Online Capbable The information conveyed by this bit depends on the value of the Enabled bit. If the Enabled bit is set, this bit is reserved and must be zero. Otherwise, if this this bit is set, system hardware supports enabling this processor during OS runtime. So with conforming firmwares it should be safe to simply ignore the entry if !ACPI_MADT_ENABLED && !ACPI_MADT_ONLINE_CAPABLE As a precaution against buggy firmwares this change, like Linux [4], ignores ACPI_MADT_ONLINE_CAPABLE completely if MADT revision < 5. Note that the MADT revision was already increased to 5 with spec version 6.2 Errata A [1], so before introducing the online capable flag. But it wasn't changed for the new flag, so this is the best we can do here. For previous discussion see thread [5]. Link: http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI%206_2_A_Sept29= .pdf # [1] Link: https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_2_B_final_Jan30= .pdf # [2] Link: https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_3_May16.pdf # [= 3] Link: https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/e2869bd7af608c343988429ceb1c2fe9964= 4a01f # [4] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/80bae614-052e-0f90-cf13-0e5e4ed1a5c= d@invisiblethingslab.com/ # [5] Signed-off-by: Simon Gaiser --- xen/arch/x86/acpi/boot.c | 19 +++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/boot.c b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/boot.c index 4a62822fa9..2d0b8a9afc 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/boot.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/boot.c @@ -77,6 +77,17 @@ static int __init cf_check acpi_parse_madt(struct acpi_t= able_header *table) return 0; } =20 +static bool __init acpi_is_processor_usable(uint32_t lapic_flags) +{ + if (lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED) + return true; + + if (madt_revision >=3D 5 && (lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ONLINE_CAPABLE)) + return true; + + return false; +} + static int __init cf_check acpi_parse_x2apic(struct acpi_subtable_header *header, const unsigned long= end) { @@ -92,9 +103,7 @@ acpi_parse_x2apic(struct acpi_subtable_header *header, c= onst unsigned long end) return 0; =20 /* Don't register processors that cannot be onlined. */ - if (madt_revision >=3D 5 && - !(processor->lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED) && - !(processor->lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ONLINE_CAPABLE)) + if (!acpi_is_processor_usable(processor->lapic_flags)) return 0; =20 if ((processor->lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED) || opt_cpu_info) { @@ -151,9 +160,7 @@ acpi_parse_lapic(struct acpi_subtable_header * header, = const unsigned long end) return 0; =20 /* Don't register processors that cannot be onlined. */ - if (madt_revision >=3D 5 && - !(processor->lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED) && - !(processor->lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ONLINE_CAPABLE)) + if (!acpi_is_processor_usable(processor->lapic_flags)) return 0; =20 if ((processor->lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED) || opt_cpu_info) --=20 2.40.1