From nobody Fri May 3 12:51:40 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of lists.xenproject.org designates 192.237.175.120 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.237.175.120; envelope-from=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org; helo=lists.xenproject.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of lists.xenproject.org designates 192.237.175.120 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org; dmarc=fail(p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1635861952300369.9121227459199; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 07:05:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.220262.381451 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mhuPq-0001ZV-Me; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 14:05:30 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 220262.381451; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 14:05:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mhuPq-0001ZO-JA; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 14:05:30 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 220262; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 14:05:29 +0000 Received: from all-amaz-eas1.inumbo.com ([34.197.232.57] helo=us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mhuPp-0001ZI-PS for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 14:05:29 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com (unknown [217.140.110.172]) by us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTP id eed45d2a-3be5-11ec-8557-12813bfff9fa; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 14:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0033D6E; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 07:05:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e125770.cambridge.arm.com (e125770.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.195.16]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DED173FA1D; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 07:05:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: eed45d2a-3be5-11ec-8557-12813bfff9fa From: Luca Fancellu To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: bertrand.marquis@arm.com, wei.chen@arm.com, Stefano Stabellini , Julien Grall , Volodymyr Babchuk , Jan Beulich Subject: [PATCH] xen/efi: Fix Grub2 boot on arm64 Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 14:05:11 +0000 Message-Id: <20211102140511.5542-1-luca.fancellu@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1635861954230100001 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The code introduced by commit a1743fc3a9fe9b68c265c45264dddf214fd9b882 ("arm/efi: Use dom0less configuration when using EFI boot") is introducing a problem to boot Xen using Grub2 on ARM machine using EDK2. The problem comes from the function get_parent_handle(...) that inside uses the HandleProtocol on loaded_image->DeviceHandle, but the last is NULL, making Xen stop the UEFI boot. Before the commit above, the function was never called because the logic was skipping the call when there were multiboot modules in the DT because the filesystem was never used and the bootloader had put in place all the right modules in memory and the addresses in the DT. To fix the problem we allow the get_parent_handle(...) function to return a NULL handle on error and we check the usage of the function to handle the new use case. The function in fact should not prevent the boot even if the filesystem can't be used, because the DT and the modules could be put in place by the bootloader before running Xen and if xen,uefi-binary property is not used, there is no need for the filesystem. Another problem is found when the UEFI stub tries to check if Dom0 image or DomUs are present. The logic doesn't work when the UEFI stub is not responsible to load any modules, so the efi_check_dt_boot(...) return value is modified to return the number of multiboot module found and not only the number of module loaded by the stub. Fixes: a1743fc3a9 ("arm/efi: Use dom0less configuration when using EFI boot= ") Signed-off-by: Luca Fancellu --- Justification for integration in 4.16: Upside: allow booting xen from grub on arm64 when the stub doesn't load any module. Downside: It's affecting the EFI boot path. Risk: It's not affecting x86 arch that works the same way as before. If something is wrong it creates a problem on early boot and not at runtime, so risk is low. Tested in this configurations: - Bootloader loads modules and specify them as multiboot modules in DT: * combination of Dom0, DomUs, Dom0 and DomUs - DT specifies multiboot modules in DT using xen,uefi-binary property: * combination of Dom0, DomUs, Dom0 and DomUs - Bootloader loads a Dom0 module and appends it as multiboot module in DT, other multiboot modules are listed for DomUs using xen,uefi-binary - No multiboot modules in DT and no kernel entry in cfg file: * proper error thrown --- xen/arch/arm/efi/efi-boot.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++---------- xen/common/efi/boot.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/efi/efi-boot.h b/xen/arch/arm/efi/efi-boot.h index 8b88dd26a5..e714b2b44c 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/efi/efi-boot.h +++ b/xen/arch/arm/efi/efi-boot.h @@ -51,9 +51,11 @@ static int handle_module_node(EFI_FILE_HANDLE dir_handle, int module_node_offset, int reg_addr_cells, int reg_size_cells, - bool is_domu_module); + bool is_domu_module, + unsigned int *modules_found); static int handle_dom0less_domain_node(EFI_FILE_HANDLE dir_handle, - int domain_node); + int domain_node, + unsigned int *modules_found); static int efi_check_dt_boot(EFI_FILE_HANDLE dir_handle); =20 #define DEVICE_TREE_GUID \ @@ -707,7 +709,8 @@ static int __init handle_module_node(EFI_FILE_HANDLE di= r_handle, int module_node_offset, int reg_addr_cells, int reg_size_cells, - bool is_domu_module) + bool is_domu_module, + unsigned int *modules_found) { const void *uefi_name_prop; char mod_string[24]; /* Placeholder for module@ + a 64-bit number + \0= */ @@ -725,6 +728,9 @@ static int __init handle_module_node(EFI_FILE_HANDLE di= r_handle, /* Module is not a multiboot,module */ return 0; =20 + /* Count the multiboot module as found */ + (*modules_found)++; + /* Read xen,uefi-binary property to get the file name. */ uefi_name_prop =3D fdt_getprop(fdt, module_node_offset, "xen,uefi-bina= ry", &uefi_name_len); @@ -804,7 +810,8 @@ static int __init handle_module_node(EFI_FILE_HANDLE di= r_handle, * Returns 0 on success, negative number on error. */ static int __init handle_dom0less_domain_node(EFI_FILE_HANDLE dir_handle, - int domain_node) + int domain_node, + unsigned int *modules_found) { int module_node, addr_cells, size_cells, len; const struct fdt_property *prop; @@ -834,7 +841,7 @@ static int __init handle_dom0less_domain_node(EFI_FILE_= HANDLE dir_handle, module_node =3D fdt_next_subnode(fdt, module_node) ) { int ret =3D handle_module_node(dir_handle, module_node, addr_cells, - size_cells, true); + size_cells, true, modules_found); if ( ret < 0 ) return ret; } @@ -845,12 +852,12 @@ static int __init handle_dom0less_domain_node(EFI_FIL= E_HANDLE dir_handle, /* * This function checks for xen domain nodes under the /chosen node for po= ssible * dom0 and domU guests to be loaded. - * Returns the number of modules loaded or a negative number for error. + * Returns the number of multiboot modules found or a negative number for = error. */ static int __init efi_check_dt_boot(EFI_FILE_HANDLE dir_handle) { int chosen, node, addr_len, size_len; - unsigned int i =3D 0; + unsigned int i =3D 0, modules_found =3D 0; =20 /* Check for the chosen node in the current DTB */ chosen =3D setup_chosen_node(fdt, &addr_len, &size_len); @@ -868,11 +875,12 @@ static int __init efi_check_dt_boot(EFI_FILE_HANDLE d= ir_handle) if ( !fdt_node_check_compatible(fdt, node, "xen,domain") ) { /* Found a node with compatible xen,domain; handle this node. = */ - if ( handle_dom0less_domain_node(dir_handle, node) < 0 ) + if ( handle_dom0less_domain_node(dir_handle, node, + &modules_found) < 0 ) return ERROR_DT_MODULE_DOMU; } else if ( handle_module_node(dir_handle, node, addr_len, size_len, - false) < 0 ) + false, &modules_found) < 0 ) return ERROR_DT_MODULE_DOM0; } =20 @@ -883,7 +891,7 @@ static int __init efi_check_dt_boot(EFI_FILE_HANDLE dir= _handle) efi_bs->FreePool(modules[i].name); } =20 - return modules_idx; + return modules_found; } =20 static void __init efi_arch_cpu(void) diff --git a/xen/common/efi/boot.c b/xen/common/efi/boot.c index 392ff3ac9b..495e7a4096 100644 --- a/xen/common/efi/boot.c +++ b/xen/common/efi/boot.c @@ -449,6 +449,13 @@ static EFI_FILE_HANDLE __init get_parent_handle(EFI_LO= ADED_IMAGE *loaded_image, CHAR16 *pathend, *ptr; EFI_STATUS ret; =20 + /* + * If DeviceHandle is NULL, we can't use the SIMPLE_FILE_SYSTEM_PROTOC= OL + * to have access to the filesystem. + */ + if ( !loaded_image->DeviceHandle ) + return NULL; + do { EFI_FILE_IO_INTERFACE *fio; =20 @@ -581,6 +588,8 @@ static bool __init read_file(EFI_FILE_HANDLE dir_handle= , CHAR16 *name, EFI_STATUS ret; const CHAR16 *what =3D NULL; =20 + if ( !dir_handle ) + blexit(L"Error: No access to the filesystem"); if ( !name ) PrintErrMesg(L"No filename", EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES); ret =3D dir_handle->Open(dir_handle, &FileHandle, name, @@ -1333,6 +1342,9 @@ efi_start(EFI_HANDLE ImageHandle, EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE *S= ystemTable) EFI_FILE_HANDLE handle =3D get_parent_handle(loaded_image, &file_name); =20 + if ( !handle ) + blexit(L"Error retrieving image name: no filesystem access= "); + handle->Close(handle); *argv =3D file_name; } @@ -1369,7 +1381,8 @@ efi_start(EFI_HANDLE ImageHandle, EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE *S= ystemTable) /* Get the number of boot modules specified on the DT or an error (<0)= */ dt_modules_found =3D efi_check_dt_boot(dir_handle); =20 - dir_handle->Close(dir_handle); + if ( dir_handle ) + dir_handle->Close(dir_handle); =20 if ( dt_modules_found < 0 ) /* efi_check_dt_boot throws some error */ --=20 2.17.1