From nobody Sat May 4 10:28:02 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of lists.xenproject.org designates 192.237.175.120 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.237.175.120; envelope-from=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org; helo=lists.xenproject.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of lists.xenproject.org designates 192.237.175.120 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org; dmarc=fail(p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1634127644983397.32929284248314; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:20:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.208338.364428 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1madFF-00065z-Rg; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:20:29 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 208338.364428; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:20:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1madFF-00065s-Ol; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:20:29 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 208338; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:20:28 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1madFE-000649-KQ for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:20:28 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com (unknown [217.140.110.172]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTP id 6c87281f-582c-4b85-ae17-24c6f53c5e19; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A5451FB; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:20:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e125770.cambridge.arm.com (e125770.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.195.16]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 80BD43F70D; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:20:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 6c87281f-582c-4b85-ae17-24c6f53c5e19 From: Luca Fancellu To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: bertrand.marquis@arm.com, wei.chen@arm.com, Stefano Stabellini , Julien Grall , Volodymyr Babchuk Subject: [PATCH] arm/docs: Clarify legacy DT bindings on UEFI Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 13:19:29 +0100 Message-Id: <20211013121929.30784-1-luca.fancellu@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1634127646647100001 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Legacy compatible strings for dom0 modules are not supported when booting using UEFI, the documentation doesn't mention that. Add a phrase to docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt to clarify it. Signed-off-by: Luca Fancellu Acked-by: Julien Grall --- docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt b/docs/misc/arm/device-t= ree/booting.txt index c6a775f4e8..017c0f13eb 100644 --- a/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt +++ b/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt @@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ Each node contains the following properties: Xen 4.4 supported a different set of legacy compatible strings which remain supported such that systems supporting both 4.4 and later can use a single DTB. + However when booting Xen using UEFI and Device Tree, the legacy + compatible strings are not supported. =20 - "xen,multiboot-module" equivalent to "multiboot,module" - "xen,linux-zimage" equivalent to "multiboot,kernel" --=20 2.17.1