[PATCH] x86/idle: Extend ISR/C6 erratum workaround to Haswell

Andrew Cooper posted 1 patch 1 week ago
Failed in applying to current master (apply log)
xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

[PATCH] x86/idle: Extend ISR/C6 erratum workaround to Haswell

Posted by Andrew Cooper 1 week ago
This bug was first discovered against Haswell.  It is definitely affected.

(The XenServer ticket for this bug was opened on 2013-05-30 which is coming up
on 7 years old, and predates Broadwell).

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
---
CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
CC: Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>
CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>

We've followed up with Intel, but based on conversations, I was expecting
Haswell to be treated the same as Broadwell in this regard.
---
 xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c
index 178cb607c2..a2248ea11f 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c
@@ -583,8 +583,16 @@ bool errata_c6_workaround(void)
          * registers), the processor may dispatch the second interrupt (from
          * the IRR bit) before the first interrupt has completed and written to
          * the EOI register, causing the first interrupt to never complete.
+         *
+         * Note: Haswell hasn't had errata issued, but this issue was first
+         * discovered on Haswell hardware, and is affected.
          */
         static const struct x86_cpu_id isr_errata[] = {
+            /* Haswell */
+            INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(0x3c),
+            INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(0x3f),
+            INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(0x45),
+            INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(0x46),
             /* Broadwell */
             INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(0x47),
             INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(0x3d),
-- 
2.11.0


Re: [PATCH] x86/idle: Extend ISR/C6 erratum workaround to Haswell

Posted by Jan Beulich 1 week ago
On 22.05.2020 17:07, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> This bug was first discovered against Haswell.  It is definitely affected.
> 
> (The XenServer ticket for this bug was opened on 2013-05-30 which is coming up
> on 7 years old, and predates Broadwell).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>