On Tue, 09 Jul 2019 01:37:08 PDT (-0700), Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 at 09:35, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com> wrote:
>> I haven't looked at the code yet, but as the last one was fine it's probably
>> OK. My only issue here is the timing: it's after the soft freeze so if I
>> understand correctly we're not supposed to take any new features into 4.1.
>> That's kind of unfortunate because it's somewhat unobtrusive and super useful.
>>
>> Peter: would you be OK taking this some time later this week? I'd want to dig
>> through it and then bang on it a bit first. If not then I'll queue it up for
>> 4.2.
>
> The first attempt at putting this into master got onto the list before
> freeze, so it's OK. Plus this clearly will only affect users using the
> riscv boards, so it's a limited-scope change. So I think we're better
> off putting it into 4.1 rather than not, assuming you're happy with
> the level of testing it's had.
Awesome. I always test stuff myself a bit, but with any luck I should be able
to get a good look at it over the next few days.