From nobody Sat Nov 15 20:48:59 2025 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass(p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1747909885; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=N63i9uwLKIG7dvtrVKElmxdGvyesZHnddK/WJlQ3qyr34fKiRcun6xqjbTpkf//cUxi/u5kRyAB3URAhNSACWJ2S3kI5V0kk9ASoyiqk4E2gxyGij0AhLoT5076QTIuwGrl0TNLj4K//S2oz+NKuP9mNZdSEScZuOLLxyuZtzCU= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1747909885; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Sender:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=QlUv3WXzN1tjBcwFhwjIM/PQQRTgeOpjkK85tto1bTY=; b=dg2CWTB9raDFemq8jr2IqllPpfzygJ/E3xhAu1YOUdGbe3RgNoiqxeG+D6FfcWb9eE6S5OnsM9/ZyqbpOB3SxHmeQAZX7YDe9ILmdci1jXimywrVs5jbCptI/e5741FItCu3uvzziCr2523m5enQSHHnIPkr5mZ/QeH6DOsyIOM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass header.from= (p=quarantine dis=none) Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1747909885461841.5701385968733; Thu, 22 May 2025 03:31:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uI3Bf-00033E-L0; Thu, 22 May 2025 06:30:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uI3Bc-00032r-WF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2025 06:30:05 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uI3Ba-0006PQ-Bd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2025 06:30:04 -0400 Received: from mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-124-PAOKFCZYPfyTwSVNlPRuWA-1; Thu, 22 May 2025 06:29:57 -0400 Received: from mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1F8D18004AD; Thu, 22 May 2025 10:29:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from toolbx.redhat.com (unknown [10.42.28.179]) by mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74AB81958014; Thu, 22 May 2025 10:29:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1747909800; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QlUv3WXzN1tjBcwFhwjIM/PQQRTgeOpjkK85tto1bTY=; b=Kh8qhjr7emiqK8WPy0kDsQ0ILkMe8krrdCErNCTpszlrHdSZMQuRQJklaz6miHirwCd1i7 Y90ParLl4ohzswxfzCGGnOTiHpZRnQ1SQtEy58KpcJpqKQdB1IGkUy2nWwerw59XFyAGrq GAXfrlHUQCmI2vczmouzNY+8Cg52N6Q= X-MC-Unique: PAOKFCZYPfyTwSVNlPRuWA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: PAOKFCZYPfyTwSVNlPRuWA_1747909796 From: =?UTF-8?q?Daniel=20P=2E=20Berrang=C3=A9?= To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: =?UTF-8?q?Daniel=20P=2E=20Berrang=C3=A9?= , =?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Markus Armbruster , Paolo Bonzini , Eric Blake , =?UTF-8?q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9=20Lureau?= , Peter Maydell , =?UTF-8?q?C=C3=A9dric=20Le=20Goater?= Subject: [PULL 08/23] Revert "scripts: mandate that new files have SPDX-License-Identifier" Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 11:29:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20250522102923.309452-9-berrange@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20250522102923.309452-1-berrange@redhat.com> References: <20250522102923.309452-1-berrange@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.40 Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -22 X-Spam_score: -2.3 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.184, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org X-ZohoMail-DKIM: pass (identity @redhat.com) X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1747909886504116600 This reverts commit fa4d79c64dae03ffa269e42e21822453856618b7. The logic in this commit was flawed in two critical ways * It always failed to report SPDX validation on the last newly added file. IOW, it only worked if at least 2 new files were added in a commit * If an existing file change, followed a new file change, in the commit and the existing file context/changed lines included SPDX-License-Identifier, it would incorrectly associate this with the previous newly added file. Simply reverting this commit will make it significantly easier to understand the improved logic in the following commit. Reported-by: Peter Maydell Reviewed-by: C=C3=A9dric Le Goater Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 --- scripts/checkpatch.pl | 30 ------------------------------ 1 file changed, 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl index 365892de04..d355c0dad5 100755 --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl @@ -1442,8 +1442,6 @@ sub process { my $in_imported_file =3D 0; my $in_no_imported_file =3D 0; my $non_utf8_charset =3D 0; - my $expect_spdx =3D 0; - my $expect_spdx_file; =20 our @report =3D (); our $cnt_lines =3D 0; @@ -1681,34 +1679,6 @@ sub process { WARN("added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?\= n" . $herecurr); } =20 -# All new files should have a SPDX-License-Identifier tag - if ($line =3D~ /^new file mode\s*\d+\s*$/) { - if ($expect_spdx) { - if ($expect_spdx_file =3D~ - /\.(c|h|py|pl|sh|json|inc|Makefile)$/) { - # source code files MUST have SPDX license declared - ERROR("New file '$expect_spdx_file' requires " . - "'SPDX-License-Identifier'"); - } else { - # Other files MAY have SPDX license if appropriate - WARN("Does new file '$expect_spdx_file' need " . - "'SPDX-License-Identifier'?"); - } - } - $expect_spdx =3D 1; - $expect_spdx_file =3D undef; - } elsif ($expect_spdx) { - $expect_spdx_file =3D $realfile unless - defined $expect_spdx_file; - - # SPDX tags may occurr in comments which were - # stripped from '$line', so use '$rawline' - if ($rawline =3D~ /SPDX-License-Identifier/) { - $expect_spdx =3D 0; - $expect_spdx_file =3D undef; - } - } - # Check SPDX-License-Identifier references a permitted license if ($rawline =3D~ m,SPDX-License-Identifier: (.*?)(\*/)?\s*$,) { &checkspdx($realfile, $1); --=20 2.49.0